World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
6707
World Ranking
11995
National Ranking
408

Marco de Gemmis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco de Gemmis sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 180 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marco de Gemmis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco de Gemmis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marco de Gemmis is affiliated with the University of Bari Aldo Moro in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of computer science and social sciences, with a specialized emphasis on artificial intelligence and information systems. The work extends into various subfields including communication, computer vision and pattern recognition, as well as computer networks and communications.

The scientist's academic portfolio is characterized by a significant volume of publications across multiple thematic areas. These topics include:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Speech and Dialogue Systems
  • Wikis in Education and Collaboration
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Research outputs have appeared in a variety of publication venues. Frequent venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Intelligent Information Systems
  • User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • IEEE Access

Noteworthy recent papers by the researcher include:

  • Towards Emotion-aware Recommender Systems: an Affective Coherence Model based on Emotion-driven Behaviors, 2020, Expert Systems with Applications
  • HealthAssistantBot: A Personal Health Assistant for the Italian Language, 2020, IEEE Access
  • Generating post hoc review-based natural language justifications for recommender systems, 2020, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • Context-aware graph-based recommendations exploiting Personalized PageRank, 2021, Knowledge-Based Systems
  • An AI framework to support decisions on GDPR compliance, 2023, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems

The researcher collaborates frequently with a core group of co-authors, including:

  • Giovanni Semeraro (26 joint publications)
  • Pasquale Lops (17 joint publications)
  • Cataldo Musto (12 joint publications)
  • Pierpaolo Basile (12 joint publications)
  • Marco Polignano (10 joint publications)

Marco de Gemmis's work contributes to advancing techniques and applications in recommender systems, emotion-aware AI models, and decision support systems with relevant implications for GDPR compliance. Their interdisciplinary approach bridges computational methods with social and communication sciences, addressing both technical and human-centric aspects of information systems.

Best Publications

  • Content-based Recommender Systems: State of the Art and Trends

    Pasquale Lops;Marco de Gemmis;Giovanni Semeraro

  • Semantics-Aware Content-Based Recommender Systems

    Marco de Gemmis;Pasquale Lops;Cataldo Musto;Fedelucio Narducci

  • Integrating tags in a semantic content-based recommender

    Marco de Gemmis;Pasquale Lops;Giovanni Semeraro;Pierpaolo Basile

  • An investigation on the serendipity problem in recommender systems

    Marco de Gemmis;Pasquale Lops;Giovanni Semeraro;Cataldo Musto

  • Learning Word Embeddings from Wikipedia for Content-Based Recommender Systems

    Cataldo Musto;Giovanni Semeraro;Marco de Gemmis;Pasquale Lops

  • Human Decision Making and Recommender Systems

    Li Chen;Marco de Gemmis;Alexander Felfernig;Pasquale Lops

  • Personalized finance advisory through case-based recommender systems and diversification strategies

    Cataldo Musto;Giovanni Semeraro;Pasquale Lops;Marco de Gemmis

  • A Multi-criteria Recommender System Exploiting Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis of Users' Reviews

    Cataldo Musto;Marco de Gemmis;Giovanni Semeraro;Pasquale Lops

  • ExpLOD: A Framework for Explaining Recommendations based on the Linked Open Data Cloud

    Cataldo Musto;Fedelucio Narducci;Pasquale Lops;Marco De Gemmis

  • Knowledge infusion into content-based recommender systems

    Giovanni Semeraro;Pasquale Lops;Pierpaolo Basile;Marco de Gemmis

  • Content-based and collaborative techniques for tag recommendation: an empirical evaluation

    Pasquale Lops;Marco De Gemmis;Giovanni Semeraro;Cataldo Musto

  • Introducing linked open data in graph-based recommender systems

    Cataldo Musto;Pierpaolo Basile;Pasquale Lops;Marco de Gemmis

  • Linked open data-based explanations for transparent recommender systems

    Cataldo Musto;Fedelucio Narducci;Pasquale Lops;Marco de Gemmis

  • Towards Emotion-aware Recommender Systems: an Affective Coherence Model based on Emotion-driven Behaviors

    Marco Polignano;Fedelucio Narducci;Marco de Gemmis;Giovanni Semeraro

  • Word Embedding techniques for Content-based Recommender Systems: An empirical evaluation

    Cataldo Musto;Giovanni Semeraro;Marco de Gemmis;Pasquale Lops

  • Human decision making and recommender systems

    Anthony Jameson;MC Martijn Willemsen;Alexander Felfernig;Marco de Gemmis

  • A Comparison of Word-Embeddings in Emotion Detection from Text using BiLSTM, CNN and Self-Attention

    Marco Polignano;Pierpaolo Basile;Marco de Gemmis;Giovanni Semeraro

  • UNIBA: JIGSAW algorithm for Word Sense Disambiguation

    Pierpaolo Basile;Marco de Gemmis;Anna Lisa Gentile;Pasquale Lops

  • HealthAssistantBot: A Personal Health Assistant for the Italian Language

    Marco Polignano;Fedelucio Narducci;Andrea Iovine;Cataldo Musto

  • Semantics-aware Graph-based Recommender Systems Exploiting Linked Open Data

    Cataldo Musto;Pasquale Lops;Pierpaolo Basile;Marco de Gemmis

  • Learning Preference Models in Recommender Systems

    Marco de Gemmis;Leo Iaquinta;Pasquale Lops;Cataldo Musto

Frequent Co-Authors

Giovanni Semeraro
Giovanni Semeraro University of Bari Aldo Moro
Pasquale Lops
Pasquale Lops University of Bari Aldo Moro
Alexander Felfernig
Alexander Felfernig Graz University of Technology
Peter Brusilovsky
Peter Brusilovsky University of Pittsburgh
Francesco Ricci
Francesco Ricci Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Tommaso Di Noia
Tommaso Di Noia Polytechnic University of Bari
Thomas Lukasiewicz
Thomas Lukasiewicz University of Oxford
Li Chen
Li Chen Hong Kong Baptist University
Donato Malerba
Donato Malerba University of Bari Aldo Moro
Juan Barceló
Juan Barceló Autonomous University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in computer science opens up a range of flexible learning options. For students looking to quickly enter the tech field, earning an associates degree online can provide foundational skills and enhance employability in as few as two years. These programs are particularly accessible for working professionals or those needing a more affordable start.

Ambitious learners interested in advancing their careers may pursue the shortest masters degree programs available online. These accelerated curricula allow you to specialize and acquire expertise without a lengthy time commitment, often finishing in a year or less.

For long-term career growth, it's valuable to research the best masters degree to get within computer science and technology. Top programs align with employer demand, offering skills in areas such as artificial intelligence, data science, or cybersecurity.

Additionally, there are certifications that pay well. These industry-recognized credentials can be earned online, are often faster to complete than a degree, and can significantly boost your earning potential and job prospects in the competitive tech sector.

Best Scientists Citing Marco de Gemmis

Trending Scientists