World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Deborah A. Prentice

Deborah A. Prentice

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
13328
World Ranking
11029
National Ranking
5749

Deborah A. Prentice publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah A. Prentice sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 58 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Deborah A. Prentice D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah A. Prentice sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Deborah A. Prentice is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas within the social sciences, psychology, and health professions, with a particular emphasis on applied psychology, sociology and political science, and general health professions.

The scientist's published work includes studies related to community health and development, social and intergroup psychology, and behavioral health and interventions. These topics reflect an interdisciplinary approach combining social norms, health behavior, and group dynamics.

One notable recent publication is titled "Engineering social change using social norms: lessons from the study of collective action", which was published in 2020 in the journal Current Opinion in Psychology. This paper has received 139 citations, indicating its use in ongoing research discussions.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Elizabeth Levy Paluck and Dale T. Miller, highlighting a network of scholars working on related aspects of social psychology and behavioral studies.

The primary venues for Deborah A. Prentice's publications include:

  • Current Opinion in Psychology

Key areas of study covered by their research are:

  • Health Professions
  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

The subfields contributing to their discipline include:

  • General Health Professions
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Applied Psychology

Main topics addressed in their work are:

  • Community Health and Development
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Best Publications

  • What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn’t Be, Are Allowed to Be, and Don’t Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes

    Deborah A. Prentice;Erica Carranza

  • Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm.

    Deborah A. Prentice;Dale T. Miller

  • When small effects are impressive

    Deborah A. Prentice;Dale T. Miller

  • The Self in Social Contexts

    Mahzarin R. Banaji;Deborah A. Prentice

  • Asymmetries in Attachments to Groups and to their Members: Distinguishing between Common-Identity and Common-Bond Groups

    Deborah A. Prentice;Dale T. Miller;Jenifer R. Lightdale

  • Changing Norms to Change Behavior

    Dale T. Miller;Deborah A. Prentice

  • Pluralistic Ignorance and the Perpetuation of Social Norms by Unwitting Actors

    Deborah A. Prentice;Dale T. Miller

  • Psychological Essentialism of Human Categories

    Deborah A. Prentice;Dale T. Miller

  • The construction of social norms and standards.

    Dale T. Miller;Deborah A. Prentice

  • Cultural Divides: Understanding and Overcoming Group Conflict

    Deborah A. Prentice;Dale T. Miller

  • What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts

    Deborah A. Prentice;Richard J. Gerrig;Daniel S. Bailis

  • The Representation of Fictional Information

    Richard J. Gerrig;Deborah A. Prentice

  • Contrast tests of interaction hypothesis.

    Robert P. Abelson;Deborah A. Prentice

  • Exposing Pluralistic Ignorance to Reduce Alcohol Use Among College Students<sup>1</sup>

    Unknown

  • Psychological Correspondence of Possessions, Attitudes, and Values

    Deborah A. Prentice

  • Exploring the boundary between fiction and reality.

    Deborah A. Prentice;Richard J. Gerrig

  • Essentializing Differences Between Women and Men

    Deborah A. Prentice;Dale T. Miller

  • Collective Errors and Errors about the Collective

    Dale T. Miller;Deborah A. Prentice

  • Minimal conditions for the creation of a unit relationship: the social bond between birthdaymates

    Dale T. Miller;Julie S. Downs;Deborah A. Prentice

  • The Self- and Other-Interest Inventory.

    Margaret E. Gerbasi;Deborah A. Prentice

  • Readers' Trait-Based Models of Characters in Narrative Comprehension☆

    David N. Rapp;Richard J. Gerrig;Deborah A. Prentice

Frequent Co-Authors

Dale T. Miller
Dale T. Miller Stanford University
John T. Jost
John T. Jost New York University
Richard J. Gerrig
Richard J. Gerrig Stony Brook University
Robert P. Abelson
Robert P. Abelson Yale University
Mahzarin R. Banaji
Mahzarin R. Banaji Harvard University
J. Nicole Shelton
J. Nicole Shelton Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the door to a wide range of rewarding careers. Many students choose to pursue counseling roles, where they can make a tangible difference in the lives of others. For example, becoming a substance abuse counselor in Plano offers the chance to help individuals struggling with addiction in a fast-growing field.

Each region has its own specific licensure requirements and opportunities. If you are interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Port St. Lucie, for example, understanding the state’s educational and certification standards is crucial. Likewise, how to become a substance abuse counselor in Portland will involve a unique set of steps and regional credentials.

Online psychology degrees can provide the flexibility needed to meet these requirements, allowing students to balance coursework with internships or job commitments. If you’re interested in the specific substance abuse counselor requirements in Raleigh, research local regulations before enrolling. Navigating these pathways can lead to a fulfilling and impactful career.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah A. Prentice

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles