World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
28996
World Ranking
5310
National Ranking
2903

Laurie A. Rudman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurie A. Rudman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Laurie A. Rudman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurie A. Rudman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laurie A. Rudman is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with specific attention to subfields such as Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their published work includes recent papers focusing on social inequalities, gender norms, and implicit cognition. Notable papers include:

  • Justifying Social Inequalities: The Role of Social Darwinism (2020), published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Meta-Analytic Use of Balanced Identity Theory to Validate the Implicit Association Test (2020), published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • How Women and Men Should (Not) Be: Gender Rules and Their Alignment With Status Beliefs Across Nations (2025), published in Psychology of Women Quarterly

Laurie A. Rudman's frequently addressed research topics incorporate:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Gender Politics and Representation
  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies

Their work has been published most frequently in the following venues:

  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Psychology of Women Quarterly

Co-authorship has been an element of Laurie A. Rudman's research activity, collaborating with researchers such as Anthony G. Greenwald, Lina Saud, Dario Cvencek, Andrew N. Meltzoff, and Craig D. Maddox.

Best Publications

  • A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept.

    Anthony G. Greenwald;Mahzarin R. Banaji;Laurie A. Rudman;Shelly D. Farnham

  • Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women

    Laurie A. Rudman;Peter Glick

  • Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management.

    Laurie A. Rudman

  • Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders.

    Laurie A. Rudman;Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Julie E. Phelan;Sanne Nauts

  • Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: the hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers.

    Laurie A. Rudman;Peter Glick

  • Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: the role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance.

    Laurie A. Rudman;Kimberly Fairchild

  • Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations

    Laurie A. Rudman;Julie E. Phelan

  • The Social Psychology of Gender: How Power and Intimacy Shape Gender Relations

    Laurie A. Rudman;Peter Glick

  • Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Female Authority

    Laurie A. Rudman;Stephen E. Kilianski

  • On the nature of prejudice : fifty years after Allport

    John F. Dovidio;Peter Samuel Glick;Laurie A. Rudman

  • "Unlearning" automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes.

    Laurie A. Rudman;Richard D. Ashmore;Melvin L. Gary

  • When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men.

    Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Julie E. Phelan;Laurie A. Rudman

  • Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: why do women like women more than men like men?

    Laurie A. Rudman;Stephanie A. Goodwin

  • Sources of Implicit Attitudes

    Laurie A. Rudman

  • Penalizing Men Who Request a Family Leave: Is Flexibility Stigma a Femininity Stigma?

    Laurie A. Rudman;Kris Mescher

  • Implicit Self-Concept and Evaluative Implicit Gender Stereotypes: Self and Ingroup Share Desirable Traits

    Laurie A. Rudman;Anthony G. Greenwald;Debbie E. McGhee

  • Everyday Stranger Harassment and Women's Objectification

    Kimberly Fairchild;Laurie A. Rudman

  • Competent Yet Out in the Cold: Shifting Criteria for Hiring Reflect Backlash Toward Agentic Women

    Julie E. Phelan;Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Laurie A. Rudman

  • Measuring the Automatic Components of Prejudice: Flexibility and Generality of the Implicit Association Test

    Laurie A. Rudman;Anthony G. Greenwald;Deborah S. Mellott;Jordan L. K. Schwartz

  • Minority Members' Implicit Attitudes: Automatic Ingroup Bias As A Function Of Group Status

    Laurie A. Rudman;Joshua Feinberg;Kimberly Fairchild

  • On the Nature of Prejudice

    John F. Dovidio;Peter Glick;Laurie A. Rudman

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Glick
Peter Glick Lawrence University
Diana T. Sanchez
Diana T. Sanchez Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Corinne A. Moss-Racusin
Corinne A. Moss-Racusin Skidmore College
Eugene Borgida
Eugene Borgida University of Minnesota
Anthony G. Greenwald
Anthony G. Greenwald University of Washington
John F. Dovidio
John F. Dovidio Yale University
Sabine Sczesny
Sabine Sczesny University of Bern
Brian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek Center for Open Science
Nilanjana Dasgupta
Nilanjana Dasgupta University of Massachusetts Amherst
John T. Jost
John T. Jost New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology students in the USA can pursue a wide range of online degrees and career pathways, especially in the field of counseling. Popular bachelor's and master's programs offer specialized training in mental health, school, or rehabilitation counseling. Demand for licensed counselors continues to grow as awareness of mental health increases nationwide.

Many universities offer flexible online options to fit busy schedules. For students exploring regional opportunities, the most popular counseling degree programs in Philadelphia and the top-ranked counseling degree programs in San Francisco highlight concentrations in clinical and community counseling. Meanwhile, the popular counseling degrees in Stockton stand out for their multicultural focus and inclusive curriculum.

For those interested in studying in the southern United States, popular counseling programs in Texas provide a pathway to professional licensure in diverse settings. Each region offers unique opportunities and specializations, making it important for students to carefully compare programs to find the best fit for their career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Laurie A. Rudman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles