World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
12253
World Ranking
7726
National Ranking
4143

Eugene Borgida publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene Borgida sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Eugene Borgida D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene Borgida sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1990 - Heinz I. Eulau Award, American Political Science Association (APSA)
  • 1990 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Eugene Borgida is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and specializes in social sciences with a significant focus on sociology and political science. Their research explores various aspects of social psychology, behavioral economics, and communication, intersecting with topics such as social and intergroup psychology, social media and politics, and decision-making processes.

Their work includes recent publications across multiple respected journals. Notable papers include:

  • "A four-dimensional model of Asian American stereotypes" (2020, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations)
  • "Meta-cognition and resistance to political persuasion: evidence from a three-wave panel study" (2020, Social Influence)
  • "How Interdisciplinary? Taking Stock of Decision-Making Research at the Intersection of Psychology and Law" (2020, Annual Review of Psychology)
  • "Plea Bargaining: A Test of Dual Discounting Preferences for Non-Monetary Losses" (2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin)
  • "Behavioral Economics in Plea-Bargain Decision-Making: Beyond the Shadow-of-Trial Model" (2021, Review of Law & Economics)

Their frequent co-authors include Lauren Clatch, Christopher M. Federico, Wen Bu, Joseph A. Vitriol, and Howard Lavine. These collaborations point to interdisciplinary connections linking psychology, law, and social influence.

Borgida has published notably in venues such as Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Social Influence, Annual Review of Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, and Social Cognition.

Their research spans key fields including:

  • Social Sciences

With subfields focused on:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Communication
  • General Decision Sciences
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

The main topics they have worked on are:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research

Awards received include being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2013, the Heinz I. Eulau Award from the American Political Science Association (APSA) in 1990, and a Fellowship of the American Psychological Association (APA) also in 1990.

Best Publications

  • Attribution and the psychology of prediction.

    Richard E. Nisbett;Eugene Borgida

  • Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates “Waltz Before a Blind Audience?”.

    John H. Aldrich;John L. Sullivan;Eugene Borgida

  • Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and Prescriptive Gender Stereotyping in Sex Discrimination

    Diana J Burgess;Eugene Borgida

  • The Differential Impact of Abstract vs. Concrete Information on Decisions

    Eugene Borgida;Richard E. Nisbett

  • Sex stereotypes and social judgment.

    Anne Locksley;Eugene Borgida;Nancy Brekke;Christine Hepburn

  • Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins..

    Susan T. Fiske;Donald N. Bersoff;Eugene Borgida;Kay Deaux

  • Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?

    Janet Swim;Eugene Borgida;Geoffrey M Maruyama;David G. Myers

  • Popular induction: Information is not necessarily informative

    Richard E. Nisbett;Eugene Borgida;Rick Crandall;Harvey Reed

  • A Social Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal

    Wendy M. Rahn;John H. Aldrich;Eugene Borgida;John L. Sullivan

  • The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects

    Laurie A. Rudman;Eugene Borgida

  • On the Primacy of Affect in the Determination of Attitudes and Behavior: The Moderating Role of Affective-Cognitive Ambivalence

    Howard Lavine;Cynthia J. Thomsen;Mark P. Zanna;Eugene Borgida

  • Expert Psychological Testimony in Rape Trials: A Social-Cognitive Analysis

    Nancy Brekke;Eugene Borgida

  • The Conjunction Fallacy: A Task Specific Phenomenon?

    Dean M. Morier;Eugene Borgida

  • On the Relationship Between Attitude Involvement and Attitude Accessibility: Toward a Cognitive-Motivational Model of Political Information Processing

    Howard Lavine;Eugene Borgida;John L. Sullivan

  • Personal involvement and the robustness of perceptual salience effects.

    Eugene Borgida;Beth Howard-Pitney

  • INDIVIDUAL AND CONTEXTUAL VARIATIONS IN POLITICAL CANDIDATE APPRAISAL

    Wendy M. Rahn;John H. Aldrich;Eugene Borgida

  • Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making ? A social cognitive analysis

    Margaret Bull Kovera;April W Gresham;Eugene Borgida;Ellen Gray

  • The relationship of national and personal issue salience to attitude accessibility on foreign and domestic policy issues

    Howard Lavine;Eugene Borgida;John L. Sullivan;Cynthia J. Thomsen

  • Civic Culture Meets the Digital Divide: The Role of Community Electronic Networks

    Eugene Borgida;John L. Sullivan;Alina Oxendine;Melinda S. Jackson

  • The Causes and Consequences of Personal Involvement

    Cynthia J. Thomsen;Eugene Borgida;Howard G Lavine

Frequent Co-Authors

John L. Sullivan
John L. Sullivan University of Minnesota
Susan T. Fiske
Susan T. Fiske Princeton University
Wendy M. Rahn
Wendy M. Rahn University of Minnesota
Howard G. Lavine
Howard G. Lavine University of Minnesota
Laurie A. Rudman
Laurie A. Rudman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
John H. Aldrich
John H. Aldrich Duke University
Kay Deaux
Kay Deaux New York University
Christopher M. Federico
Christopher M. Federico University of Minnesota
Diana J. Burgess
Diana J. Burgess United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Madeline E. Heilman
Madeline E. Heilman New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA can open doors to a variety of rewarding careers, particularly in social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students consider online degrees for added flexibility and affordability. Choosing the right online program is crucial, especially with rising education costs.

There are excellent options for affordable social work education across different states. For instance, those looking for affordable social work degrees in Iowa will discover several reputable institutions offering accessible online programs. Students living in Indiana can explore the cheapest social work degrees in Indiana to begin their journey in social advocacy and support roles.

Kansas also provides multiple accredited choices for online learners interested in the cheapest social work programs in Kansas. Meanwhile, those near Arkansas may find the cheapest social work degrees in Little Rock particularly appealing.

Regardless of your state, online education in Psychology and related fields can pave the way for fulfilling careers in mental health, community services, and counseling. Compare affordable options to find the best fit for your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Eugene Borgida

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles