World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Madeline E. Heilman

Madeline E. Heilman

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
26702
World Ranking
3775
National Ranking
2113

Madeline E. Heilman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Madeline E. Heilman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Madeline E. Heilman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Madeline E. Heilman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Madeline E. Heilman is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Social Sciences, with a strong focus on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, and Clinical Psychology as subfields. The scientist's work addresses various aspects of gender diversity, inequality, and social psychology.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Gender Politics and Representation
  • Gender, Security, and Conflict
  • Personality Traits and Psychology

Madeline E. Heilman has contributed to several recent academic papers, with notable titles including:

  • Women at Work: Pathways from Gender Stereotypes to Gender Bias and Discrimination, 2023, published in Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • Breaking the glass ceiling: For one and all?, 2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Belief in sexism shift: Defining a new form of contemporary sexism and introducing the belief in sexism shift scale (BSS scale), 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Choice or circumstance: When are women penalized for their success?, 2020, Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • Footsteps I would like to follow? How gender quotas affect the acceptance of women leaders as role models and inspirations for leadership, 2022, European Journal of Social Psychology

Their research has been published in various venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Sex Roles
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • PLoS ONE

Madeline E. Heilman has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Francesca Manzi
  • Suzette Caleo
  • Miriam K. Zehnter
  • Patrick E. Shrout
  • Christa Nater

Best Publications

  • Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder.

    Madeline E. Heilman

  • Penalties for Success: Reactions to Women Who Succeed at Male Gender-Typed Tasks.

    Madeline E. Heilman;Aaron S. Wallen;Daniella Fuchs;Melinda M. Tamkins

  • Gender stereotypes and workplace bias

    Madeline E. Heilman

  • Sex bias in work settings: The Lack of Fit model.

    Madeline E. Heilman

  • Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: the implied communality deficit.

    Madeline E. Heilman;Tyler G. Okimoto

  • Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers.

    Madeline E. Heilman;Caryn J. Block;Richard F. Martell;Michael C. Simon

  • When fit is fundamental: performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers.

    Karen S. Lyness;Madeline E. Heilman

  • Same behavior, different consequences: reactions to men's and women's altruistic citizenship behavior.

    Madeline E. Heilman;Julie J. Chen

  • Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts.

    Madeline E. Heilman;Caryn J. Block;Jonathan A. Lucas

  • When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs.

    Madeline E. Heilman;Lois R. Saruwatari

  • Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers?

    Madeline E. Heilman;Caryn J. Block;Richard F. Martell

  • Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins..

    Susan T. Fiske;Donald N. Bersoff;Eugene Borgida;Kay Deaux

  • The multiple dimensions of gender stereotypes: A current look at men's and women's characterizations of others and themselves

    Tanja Hentschel;Tanja Hentschel;Madeline E. Heilman;Claudia V. Peus

  • Sex stereotypes and their effects in the workplace: What we know and what we don't know.

    Madeline E. Heilman

  • Gender Stereotypes Are Alive, Well, and Busy Producing Workplace Discrimination

    Madeline E. Heilman;Alice H. Eagly

  • Motherhood: A Potential Source of Bias in Employment Decisions

    Madeline E. Heilman;Tyler G. Okimoto

  • No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women's success in male-female teams

    Madeline E. Heilman;Michelle C. Haynes

  • Entrepreneurship as a solution: The allure of self-employment for women and minorities

    Madeline E. Heilman;Julie J. Chen

  • The Affirmative Action Stigma Of Incompetence: Effects Of Performance Information Ambiguity

    Madeline E. Heilman;Caryn J. Block;Peter Stathatos

  • Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job type.

    Madeline E Heilman;Melanie H Stopeck

Frequent Co-Authors

Alice H. Eagly
Alice H. Eagly Northwestern University
Sabine Sczesny
Sabine Sczesny University of Bern
Susan T. Fiske
Susan T. Fiske Princeton University
Kay Deaux
Kay Deaux New York University
Eugene Borgida
Eugene Borgida University of Minnesota
Tyler G. Okimoto
Tyler G. Okimoto University of Queensland
Kathy E. Kram
Kathy E. Kram Boston University
Isabell M. Welpe
Isabell M. Welpe Technical University of Munich
Corinne A. Moss-Racusin
Corinne A. Moss-Racusin Skidmore College
Karl Aquino
Karl Aquino University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring psychologists often consider related disciplines to expand their expertise or open up varied career options. Social work is a popular pathway, especially given the growing flexibility and affordability of online degree programs throughout the U.S. Online social work degrees can prepare you for roles in community counseling, mental health support, and case management—all closely tied to psychology.

If you are seeking cost-effective learning options, there are several resources to explore. For those based in Texas, the most affordable online master's in social work degree programs in Texas give you a range of accredited choices. Nationwide, you’ll find a variety of affordable online social work master's degrees in USA that can significantly lower your education costs while maintaining high standards.

Many students also compare options by state. Ohio has some of the cheapest online social work programs in Ohio, supporting candidates seeking value and flexibility. Likewise, if you're in the Southeast, you might explore the cheapest online social work programs in Tennessee. All of these programs can complement a psychology education and broaden your career prospects in mental health and social services.

Best Scientists Citing Madeline E. Heilman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles