World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gordon B. Moskowitz

Gordon B. Moskowitz

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
13221
World Ranking
8704
National Ranking
4633

Gordon B. Moskowitz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon B. Moskowitz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 78 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gordon B. Moskowitz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon B. Moskowitz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gordon B. Moskowitz is affiliated with Lehigh University in the United States and has contributed to several areas within psychology and social sciences. Their research focuses primarily on social psychology, with further exploration into sociology, political science, cognitive neuroscience, and experimental psychology.

The main topics covered in their work include social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, racial and ethnic identity research, medical education and admissions, creativity in education and neuroscience, and behavioral health and interventions.

Recent research papers authored or co-authored by Moskowitz include:

  • Investigating the Relationship between Resident Physician Implicit Bias and Language Use during a Clinical Encounter with Hispanic Patients, 2021, Health Communication
  • Reducing defensive responding to implicit bias feedback: On the role of perceived moral threat and efficacy to change, 2021, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • Flexibility mindsets: Reducing biases that result from spontaneous processing, 2021, European Review of Social Psychology
  • Easy to Make, Hard to Revise: Updating Spontaneous Trait Inferences in the Presence of Trait-Inconsistent Information, 2020, Social Cognition
  • Internal conflict and prejudice-regulation: Emotional ambivalence buffers against defensive responding to implicit bias feedback, 2022, PLoS ONE

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Moskowitz include:

  • Irmak Olcaysoy Ökten
  • Joseph A. Vitriol
  • Katherine Wolsiefer
  • Matthias R. Mehl
  • Colleen K. Cagno

Moskowitz's publications often appear in venues such as:

  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Social Cognition
  • Health Communication
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • European Review of Social Psychology

Their work addresses issues related to implicit bias, moral and emotional judgment, prejudice regulation, and the dynamics of social cognition, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach that intersects psychology with social and cultural dimensions.

Best Publications

  • Perspective-taking: decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism.

    Adam D. Galinsky;Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism.

    Unknown

  • Preconscious Control of Stereotype Activation Through Chronic Egalitarian Goals

    Gordon B. Moskowitz;Peter M. Gollwitzer;Wolfgang Wasel;Bernd Schaal

  • Goal Effects on Action and Cognition

    Peter M. Gollwitzer;Gordon B. Moskowitz;Gordon B. Moskowitz;Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • Social Cognition: Understanding Self and Others

    Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • People as Flexible Interpreters: Evidence and Issues from Spontaneous Trait Inference

    James S. Uleman;Leonard S. Newman;Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect.

    Stephen M. Garcia;Kim Weaver;Gordon B. Moskowitz;John M. Darley

  • The personal need for structure and personal fear of invalidity measures: Historical perspectives, current applications, and future directions.

    Megan M. Thompson;Michael E. Naccarato;Kevin C. H. Parker;Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information

    Gerd Bohner;Gordon B. Moskowitz;Shelly Chaiken

  • Don't stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming

    Kai Sassenberg;Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information.

    Erik P. Thompson;Robert J. Roman;Gordon B. Moskowitz;Shelly Chaiken

  • Evidence for implicit evaluative in-group bias: Affect-biased spontaneous trait inference in a minimal group paradigm.

    Sabine Otten;Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • Non-conscious bias in medical decision making: what can be done to reduce it?

    Jeff Stone;Gordon B Moskowitz

  • Counterfactuals as behavioral primes: Priming the simulation heuristic and consideration of alternatives.

    Adam D. Galinsky;Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • Individual differences in social categorization: The influence of personal need for structure on spontaneous trait inferences.

    Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • Cognitive social psychology : the Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition

    Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • Preconscious effects of temporary goals on attention

    Gordon B Moskowitz

  • On-Line Evidence for Spontaneous Trait Inferences at Encoding

    James S. Uleman;Alex Hon;Robert J. Roman;Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • Responding to subliminal cues: Do if-then plans facilitate action preparation and initiation without conscious intent?

    Ute C. Bayer;Anja Achtziger;Peter M. Gollwitzer;Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • Egalitarian goals trigger stereotype inhibition: A proactive form of stereotype control☆

    Gordon B. Moskowitz;Peizhong Li

  • The psychology of goals

    Gordon B. Moskowitz;Heidi Grant

  • Preconsciously Controlling Stereotyping: Implicitly Activated Egalitarian Goals Prevent the Activation of Stereotypes

    Gordon B. Moskowitz;Amanda R. Salomon;Constance M. Taylor

  • The Implicit Volition Model: On the Preconscious Regulation of Temporarily Adopted Goals

    Gordon B. Moskowitz;Peizhong Li;Elizabeth R. Kirk

  • Cognitive Social Psychology

    G. Moskowitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeff Stone
Jeff Stone University of Arizona
Adam D. Galinsky
Adam D. Galinsky Columbia University
Kai Sassenberg
Kai Sassenberg Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
James S. Uleman
James S. Uleman New York University
Peter M. Gollwitzer
Peter M. Gollwitzer New York University
Shelly Chaiken
Shelly Chaiken New York University
John A. Bargh
John A. Bargh Yale University
Gerd Bohner
Gerd Bohner Bielefeld University
John M. Darley
John M. Darley Princeton University
Sabine Otten
Sabine Otten University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to several related fields, especially in social work and mental health services. Many students choose to start or supplement their studies with online programs, offering flexibility and often lower costs.

Those interested in affordable pathways may consider exploring most affordable social work degree programs in Utah or review the cheapest social work programs in Virginia. Both options provide a solid foundation for careers in counseling, case management, or community outreach.

For students in metropolitan areas, the cheapest social work degrees in Washington, D.C. highlight opportunities within urban settings, alongside networking and internships.

You can also compare offerings throughout the wider region by checking the cheapest social work degrees in the West. These various pathways provide the skills needed for impactful roles in healthcare, education, and advocacy.

Carefully choosing an affordable and accredited program can help you achieve your career goals in psychology or related fields, while managing educational costs.

Best Scientists Citing Gordon B. Moskowitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles