World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
9429
World Ranking
9045
National Ranking
4796

James S. Uleman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James S. Uleman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 81 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

James S. Uleman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James S. Uleman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

James S. Uleman is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their research primarily spans psychology, with a focus on experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, and the visual and performing arts.

Their work encompasses several main topics including cultural differences and values, social and intergroup psychology, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, creativity in education and neuroscience, art education and development, and language, metaphor, and cognition.

Recent publications include the following papers:

  • Attention allocation is a possible mediator of cultural variations in spontaneous trait and situation inferences: Eye-tracking evidence (2021) - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • The Cross-Cultural Interplay of Visual Attention and Artistic Design in Comics: Insights From Eye-Tracking Evidence on American and Japanese Readers (2025) - Cognitive Science

Frequent coauthors of James S. Uleman include:

  • Yuki Shimizu
  • Motohiro Kozawa
  • Keiichi Watanuki
  • Honami Arihara

Their research contributions have appeared primarily in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and Cognitive Science.

James S. Uleman has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) since 1994.

Best Publications

  • The new unconscious.

    Ran R. Hassin;James S. Uleman;John A. Bargh

  • When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences

    Laraine Winter;James S. Uleman

  • Spontaneous self-descriptions and ethnic identities in individualistic and collectivistic cultures.

    Eun Rhee;James S. Uleman;Hoon K. Lee;Robert J. Roman

  • People as Flexible Interpreters: Evidence and Issues from Spontaneous Trait Inference

    James S. Uleman;Leonard S. Newman;Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • Spontaneous Inferences, Implicit Impressions, and Implicit Theories

    James S. Uleman;S. Adil Saribay;Celia M. Gonzalez

  • Variations in Collectivism and Individualism by Ingroup and Culture: Confirmatory Factor Analyses

    Eun Rhee;James S. Uleman;Hoon Koo Lee

  • Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors' faces: evidence from a false recognition paradigm.

    Alexander T. Todorov;James S. Uleman

  • The efficiency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors’ faces

    Alexander T. Todorov;James S. Uleman

  • Consciousness and Control The Case of Spontaneous Trait Inferences

    James S. Uleman

  • A neural mechanism of first impressions

    Daniela Schiller;Daniela Schiller;Jonathan B Freeman;Jonathan B Freeman;Jason P Mitchell;James S Uleman

  • Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Spontaneous Trait Inference

    Leonard S. Newman;James S. Uleman

  • On-Line Evidence for Spontaneous Trait Inferences at Encoding

    James S. Uleman;Alex Hon;Robert J. Roman;Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • Spontaneous trait inference and construal level theory: Psychological distance increases nonconscious trait thinking.

    SoYon Rim;James S. Uleman;Yaacov Trope

  • The person reference process in spontaneous trait inferences.

    Alexander T. Todorov;James S. Uleman

  • How automatic are social judgments

    Laraine Winter;James S. Uleman;Cathryn Cunniff

  • The relational self: Closeness to ingroups depends on who they are, culture, and the type of closeness

    James S. Uleman;Eun Rhee;Nenshad Bardoliwalla;Gün Semin

  • Spontaneous trait inference.

    Leonard S. Newman;James S. Uleman

  • Unintended effects of goals on unintended inferences.

    James S. Uleman;Gordon B. Moskowitz

  • Variations in collectivism and individualism by ingroup and culture: Confirmatory factor analysis.

    Unknown

  • Spontaneous versus intentional inferences in impression formation

    James S. Uleman

  • EFFECTS OF CULTURE AND PROCESSING GOALS ON THE ACTIVATION AND BINDING OF TRAIT CONCEPTS

    Michael A. Zárate;James S. Uleman;Corrine I. Voils

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth A. Phelps
Elizabeth A. Phelps Harvard University
John A. Bargh
John A. Bargh Yale University
Ran R. Hassin
Ran R. Hassin Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Gordon B. Moskowitz
Gordon B. Moskowitz Lehigh University
Alexander Todorov
Alexander Todorov University of Chicago
Daniela Schiller
Daniela Schiller Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Tobias Brosch
Tobias Brosch University of Geneva
Daniel M. Wegner
Daniel M. Wegner Harvard University
Jason P. Mitchell
Jason P. Mitchell Harvard University
Gifford Weary
Gifford Weary The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to diverse career opportunities, including roles in counseling, research, administration, and especially behavior analysis. One in-demand career is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a specialized field that involves supporting individuals with behavioral challenges.

Many aspiring BCBAs choose online psychology degrees as a flexible path toward fulfilling educational and certification requirements. However, requirements to become a BCBA can vary depending on where you plan to practice. For instance, candidates should review the Denver bcba requirements if they are interested in the Denver area, while others might look at the bcba certification requirements in Detroit.

Similarly, students considering opportunities in other regions will find guidance by checking the Durham bcba requirements or learning how to become a bcba in El Paso. Be sure to understand the local guidelines where you wish to practice, as each state or city may have unique prerequisites, training, or clinical hour requirements for certification.

Earning a psychology degree online can offer the flexibility you need while preparing you for a rewarding, impactful career path like behavior analysis and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing James S. Uleman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles