World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 31 11050 10341 5765 5263 76 8159

Jeff Stone publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeff Stone between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeff Stone published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2011. 3 of the 88 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2011. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1991 2025

88 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeff Stone: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 2
1998 0
1999 3
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 3
2004 0
2005 1
2006 0
2007 0
2008 5
2009 2
2010 4
2011 7
2012 7
2013 4
2014 4
2015 2
2016 5
2017 3
2018 2
2019 6
2020 6
2021 6
2022 5
2023 2
2024 1
2025 2
Total 88
Download as CSV

Jeff Stone publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff Stone sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 76 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 76
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeff Stone D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff Stone sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30–31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398 31
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeff Stone is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States and contributes to research primarily within the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology. Their work spans several subfields including Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, and Clinical Psychology.

Their research focuses on topics such as Racial and Ethnic Identity Research, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Media Influence and Health, and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening.

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by Jeff Stone are:

  • Association of Gender and Race With Allocation of Advanced Heart Failure Therapies, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Investigating the Relationship between Resident Physician Implicit Bias and Language Use during a Clinical Encounter with Hispanic Patients, 2021, Health Communication
  • Applied Racial/Ethnic Healthcare Disparities Research Using Implicit Measures, 2020, Social Cognition
  • Health Care Providers' Negative Implicit Attitudes and Stereotypes of American Indians, 2020, Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
  • A Multilab Replication of the Induced-Compliance Paradigm of Cognitive Dissonance, 2024, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jeff Stone include:

  • Colin A. Zestcott
  • Tara K. Torres
  • Khadijah Breathett
  • Erika Yee
  • Natalie Pool

Jeff Stone's work appears regularly in the following publication venues:

  • Health Communication
  • Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • Social Cognition

Best Publications

  • Stereotype Threat Effects on Black and White Athletic Performance

    Jeff Stone;Christian I. Lynch;Mike Sjomeling;John M. Darley

  • A Self-Standards Model of Cognitive Dissonance

    Jeff Stone;Joel Cooper;Joel Cooper

  • Inducing Hypocrisy as a Means of Encouraging Young Adults to Use Condoms

    Jeff Stone;Elliot Aronson;A. Lauren Crain;Matthew P. Winslow

  • Overcoming denial and increasing the intention to use condoms through the induction of hypocrisy.

    Elliot Aronson;Carrie Fried;Jeff Stone

  • Battling Doubt by Avoiding Practice: The Effects of Stereotype Threat on Self-Handicapping in White Athletes

    Jeff Stone

  • When exemplification fails: hypocrisy and the motive for self-integrity.

    Jeff Stone;Andrew W. Wiegand;Joel Cooper;Elliot Aronson

  • Examining the presence, consequences, and reduction of implicit bias in health care: A narrative review:

    Colin A. Zestcott;Irene V. Blair;Jeff Stone

  • Non-conscious bias in medical decision making: what can be done to reduce it?

    Jeff Stone;Gordon B Moskowitz

  • "White men can't jump": Evidence for the perceptual confirmation of racial stereotypes following a basketball game

    Jeff Stone;Zachary W. Perry;John M. Darley

  • To Practice What We Preach: The Use of Hypocrisy and Cognitive Dissonance to Motivate Behavior Change

    Jeff Stone;Nicholas C. Fernandez

  • Do achievement goals mediate stereotype threat?: an investigation on females' soccer performance.

    Aïna Chalabaev;Philippe Sarrazin;Jeff Stone;François Cury

  • Evidence that blatant versus subtle stereotype threat cues impact performance through dual processes.

    Jeff Stone;Chad McWhinnie

  • The Role of Gender Identities and Stereotype Salience With the Academic Performance of Male and Female College Athletes

    C. Keith Harrison;Jeff Stone;Jenessa Shapiro;Sharon Yee

  • Implicit Stereotyping and Medical Decisions: Unconscious Stereotype Activation in Practitioners' Thoughts About African Americans.

    Gordon B. Moskowitz;Jeff Stone;Amanda Childs

  • The effect of self-attribute relevance on how self-esteem moderates attitude change in dissonance processes ☆

    Jeff Stone;Joel Cooper

  • “Don't Call Me a Student-Athlete”: The Effect of Identity Priming on Stereotype Threat for Academically Engaged African American College Athletes

    Jeff Stone;C. Keith Harrison;Ja Vonte Mottley

  • Athletic Voices and Academic Victories: African American Male Student-Athlete Experiences in the Pac-Ten

    Brandon E. Martin;C. Keith Harrison;Jeffrey Stone;Suzanne Malia Lawrence

  • The Influence of Behavior on Attitudes

    James M. Olson;Jeff Stone

  • The reinstatement of dissonance and psychological discomfort following failed affirmations

    Adam D. Galinsky;Jeff Stone;Joel Cooper

  • Association of Gender and Race With Allocation of Advanced Heart Failure Therapies

    Khadijah Breathett;Erika Yee;Natalie Pool;Megan Hebdon

  • ImplicitStereotypingandMedicalDecisions:Unconscious StereotypeActivationinPractitioners'ThoughtsAbout AfricanAmericans

    Gordon B. Moskowitz;Jeff Stone;Amanda Childs

Frequent Co-Authors

Gordon B. Moskowitz
Gordon B. Moskowitz Lehigh University
Joel Cooper
Joel Cooper Princeton University
Aïna Chalabaev
Aïna Chalabaev Grenoble Alpes University
Elliot Aronson
Elliot Aronson University of California, Santa Cruz
Philippe Sarrazin
Philippe Sarrazin Grenoble Alpes University
Toni Schmader
Toni Schmader University of British Columbia
John M. Darley
John M. Darley Princeton University
Michael A. Hogg
Michael A. Hogg Claremont Graduate University
Mark J. Landau
Mark J. Landau University of Kansas
Alexander A. Green
Alexander A. Green Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a psychology degree in the USA, it’s essential to weigh both educational quality and career value. Many students now explore online psychology programs, offering flexible pathways to careers in counseling, human resources, education, and research. Choosing a program with strong real-world outcomes can significantly boost your employability and earning potential.

For those seeking top programs, location can make a difference. Examples include the most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in Jacksonville, which highlights schools known for excellent outcomes. In New Jersey, the best value psychology programs in New Jersey offer affordability and strong career prospects. Meanwhile, New York is well-regarded for its most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in New York, opening doors to diverse opportunities in a competitive market. Students in the Southwest can explore the best value psychology degrees in Phoenix for accessible, high-impact options.

With a variety of respected online programs available, students should research regional strengths and specializations to match their career ambitions. The right choice can lead to rewarding and impactful careers in psychology-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jeff Stone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles