World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 59 3625 3341 2036 1834 143 23592

Margaret A. Neale publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Margaret A. Neale between 1982 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Margaret A. Neale published across 43 years, from 1982 to 2024, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1995. 3 of the 168 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1995. 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 6 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication
1982 2024

168 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Margaret A. Neale: publications per year, 1982 to 2024
Year Publications
1982 2
1983 3
1984 1
1985 6
1986 8
1987 5
1988 1
1989 2
1990 4
1991 4
1992 9
1993 4
1994 6
1995 10
1996 5
1997 2
1998 6
1999 4
2000 4
2001 1
2002 4
2003 8
2004 7
2005 3
2006 4
2007 3
2008 2
2009 3
2010 4
2011 7
2012 2
2013 2
2014 4
2015 10
2016 2
2017 3
2018 1
2019 2
2020 3
2021 2
2022 2
2023 2
2024 1
Total 168
Download as CSV

Margaret A. Neale publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret A. Neale sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 143 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 143
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Margaret A. Neale D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret A. Neale sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 59
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Margaret A. Neale is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and conducts research primarily within the social sciences and business management fields.

The scientist's work spans several subfields of study, including:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Gender Studies
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Accounting

Major topics covered in this body of research include:

  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Labor Market Dynamics and Wage Inequality
  • Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Corporate Finance and Governance

Margaret A. Neale has published in several peer-reviewed venues, notably:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings (5 publications)
  • Organization Science (2 publications)
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (1 publication)
  • PLoS ONE (1 publication)

Recent scholarly papers authored or coauthored by this researcher include:

  • "The dynamics of gender and alternatives in negotiation," 2021, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • "The Consequences of Revealing First-Generational Status," 2023, Organization Science
  • "Do Investors Value Workforce Gender Diversity?" 2024, Organization Science
  • "Moving outside the board room: A proof-of-concept study on the impact of walking while negotiating," 2023, PLoS ONE
  • "How Biased Perceptions of Inequality Reproduce Class Differences in Organizations," 2020, Academy of Management Proceedings

Frequent collaborators in these research efforts include Jennifer Dannals, Andrea Freund, Julian Jake Zlatev, Nir Halevy, and Peter Belmi.

Best Publications

  • Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict and Performance in Workgroups:

    Karen A. Jehn;Gregory B. Northcraft;Margaret A. Neale

  • What Differences Make a Difference?: The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations

    Elizabeth Mannix;Margaret A. Neale

  • Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions

    Gregory B. Northcraft;Margaret Ann Neale

  • Group composition and decision making : How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance

    Deborah H Gruenfeld;Elizabeth A. Mannix;Katherine Y. Williams;Margaret A. Neale

  • Being Different Yet Feeling Similar: The Influence Of Demographic Composition And Organizational Culture On Work Processes And Outcomes

    Jennifer A. Chatman;Jeffrey T. Polzer;Sigal G. Barsade;Margaret A. Neale

  • Virtualness and knowledge in teams: managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology

    Terri L. Griffith;John E. Sawyer;Margaret A. Neale

  • Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation

    Margaret Ann Neale;Max H. Bazerman

  • Expertise in forecasting performance of security analysts

    John Jacob;Thomas Z. Lys;Margaret A. Neale

  • The Effects of Framing and Negotiator Overconfidence on Bargaining Behaviors and Outcomes

    Margaret A. Neale;Max H. Bazerman

  • Integrative bargaining in a competitive market

    Max H Bazerman;Thomas Magliozzi;Margaret A Neale

  • Who's Really Sharing? Effects of Social and Expert Status on Knowledge Exchange Within Groups

    Melissa C. Thomas-Hunt;Tonya Y. Ogden;Margaret A. Neale

  • Heuristics in Negotiation: Limitations to Effective Dispute Resolution

    Max H. Bazerman;Margaret A. Neale

  • 8. Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory

    Terri L. Griffith;Margaret A. Neale

  • Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties.

    Katherine W Phillips;Elizabeth A Mannix;Margaret A Neale;Deborah H. Gruenfeld

  • Surface-level diversity and decision-making in groups : When does deep-level similarity help?

    Katherine W. Phillips;Gregory B. Northcraft;Margaret A. Neale

  • The Role of Perspective-Taking Ability in Negotiating under Different Forms of Arbitration:

    Margaret A. Neale;Max H. Bazerman

  • The Impact of Alternatives to Settlement in Dyadic Negotiation

    Robin L. Pinkley;Margaret A. Neale;Rebecca J. Bennett

  • Opportunity costs and the framing of resource allocation decisions

    Gregory B Northcraft;Margaret A Neale

  • Behavioral negotiation theory : a framework for conceptualizing dyadic bargaining

    Margaret Ann Neale;Gregory B. Northcraft

  • Improving negotiation effectiveness under final offer arbitration: The role of selection and training.

    Max H. Bazerman;Margaret A. Neale

  • The framing of negotiations: Contextual versus task frames

    Margaret A Neale;Vandra L Huber;Gregory B Northcraft

  • Is the Pain Worth the Gain? The Advantages and Liabilities of Agreeing With Socially Distinct Newcomers

    Katherine W. Phillips;Katie A. Liljenquist;Margaret A. Neale

  • Experts, amateurs, and refrigerators: Comparing expert and amateur negotiators in a novel task

    Margaret Ann Neale;Gregory B. Northcraft

  • Power and influence in organizations

    Roderick Moreland Kramer;Margaret Ann Neale

  • Resources versus respect: Social judgments based on targets' power and status positions

    Alison R. Fragale;Jennifer R. Overbeck;Margaret A. Neale

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory B. Northcraft
Gregory B. Northcraft University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Max H. Bazerman
Max H. Bazerman Harvard University
Lee Ross
Lee Ross Stanford University
Thomas Z. Lys
Thomas Z. Lys Northwestern University
Geoffrey L. Cohen
Geoffrey L. Cohen Stanford University
Roderick M. Kramer
Roderick M. Kramer Stanford University
Robert I. Sutton
Robert I. Sutton Stanford University
Laura J. Kray
Laura J. Kray University of California, Berkeley
Karen A. Jehn
Karen A. Jehn University of Melbourne
Edward J. Zajac
Edward J. Zajac Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up diverse social science courses in college. These courses provide foundational knowledge in human behavior, research methods, and ethics—skills valuable in many career fields.

It’s important to understand the difference sociology and psychology. While both explore human behavior, psychology focuses on individual mental processes, while sociology examines broader social structures and patterns.

Students interested in clinical practice or counseling may want to research specialized programs. For those in Maryland, exploring the best counseling degree programs in Baltimore can offer insight into top local options. Alternatively, those in Massachusetts can evaluate the best counseling program rankings in Boston.

Choosing the right degree and career pathway depends on your interests—whether clinical work, research, or social science—and your preferred study format, with many flexible online options available for every stage of your journey.

Best Scientists Citing Margaret A. Neale

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles