World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 66 2633 2413 1511 1353 114 66998

Lee Ross publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lee Ross between 1966 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lee Ross published across 60 years, from 1966 to 2025, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2004. 1 of the 121 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2004. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 3 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 5 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1966 2025

121 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lee Ross: publications per year, 1966 to 2025
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 1
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 3
1975 2
1976 3
1977 5
1978 0
1979 1
1980 2
1981 4
1982 5
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 2
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 4
1991 2
1992 3
1993 0
1994 0
1995 3
1996 1
1997 3
1998 1
1999 5
2000 0
2001 2
2002 4
2003 4
2004 7
2005 2
2006 4
2007 1
2008 3
2009 3
2010 2
2011 4
2012 7
2013 4
2014 3
2015 3
2016 2
2017 1
2018 2
2019 1
2020 2
2021 1
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 121
Download as CSV

Lee Ross publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee Ross sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 114
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lee Ross D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee Ross sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218 66
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lee Ross is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and conducts research primarily within the fields of social sciences and medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including law, communication, political science and international relations, sociology and political science, and family practice.

Their research covers a variety of topics, among which jury decision-making processes, social media and politics, electoral systems and political participation, social and intergroup psychology, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, innovations in medical education, and empathy and medical education are notable.

Lee Ross has published in several academic venues. The frequent publication outlets include:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Law and Human Behavior
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • European Journal of Public Health

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Lee Ross are:

  • The objectivity illusion and voter polarization in the 2016 presidential election, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • The impact of minimal versus extended voir dire and judicial rehabilitation on mock jurors' decisions in civil cases., 2021, Law and Human Behavior
  • Pitfalls from Psychology Science that Worsen with Practice, 2020, Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • The Impact of Minimal versus Extended Voir Dire and Judicial Rehabilitation in Civil Cases, 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Impacts of anti-trans discourses on gender-affirming care access in Brazil: family and provider views, 2025, European Journal of Public Health

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Lee Ross on multiple occasions include:

  • Jessica M. Salerno
  • Hannah Phalen
  • Samantha Bean
  • Valerie P. Hans
  • Daphna Spivack

Best Publications

  • Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment

    Richard E. Nisbett;Lee Ross

  • The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1

    Lee Ross

  • Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence

    Charles G. Lord;Lee Ross;Mark R. Lepper

  • The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes

    Lee Ross;David Greene;Pamela House

  • The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology

    Lee Ross;Richard E. Nisbett

  • The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre.

    Robert P. Vallone;Lee Ross;Mark R. Lepper

  • Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm.

    Lee Ross;Mark R. Lepper;Michael Hubbard

  • The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others

    Emily Pronin;Emily Pronin;Daniel Y. Lin;Lee Ross

  • Perseverance of Social Theories: The Role of Explanation in the Persistence of Discredited Information

    Craig A. Anderson;Mark R. Lepper;Lee Ross

  • Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others.

    Emily Pronin;Thomas Gilovich;Lee Ross

  • Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding.

    Lee Ross;Andrew Ward

  • The Name of the Game: Predictive Power of Reputations versus Situational Labels in Determining Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Moves

    Varda Liberman;Steven M. Samuels;Lee Ross

  • Social Roles, Social Control, and Biases in Social-Perception Processes

    Lee D. Ross;Teresa M. Amabile;Julia L. Steinmetz

  • The Mentor’s Dilemma: Providing Critical Feedback Across the Racial Divide

    Geoffrey L. Cohen;Claude M. Steele;Lee D. Ross

  • Actual versus assumed differences in construal: 'naive realism' in intergroup perception and conflict

    Robert J. Robinson;Dacher Keltner;Andrew Ward;Lee Ross

  • Hedonic Consequences of Social Comparison: A Contrast of Happy and Unhappy People

    Sonja Lyubomirsky;Lee Ross

  • Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice ☆

    Aaron C. Kay;S.Christian Wheeler;John A. Bargh;Lee Ross

  • Subjective Construal, Social Inference, and Human Misunderstanding

    Dale W. Griffin;Lee Ross

  • The overconfidence effect in social prediction.

    David Dunning;Dale W. Griffin;James D. Milojkovic;Lee Ross

  • Social cognitive development : frontiers and possible futures

    John H. Flavell;Lee Ross

  • Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.

    Howard J. Weiner;Richard Nisbett;Lee Ross

  • Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.

    Terry Connolly;Richard Nisbett;Lee Ross

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark R. Lepper
Mark R. Lepper Stanford University
Richard E. Nisbett
Richard E. Nisbett University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas Gilovich
Thomas Gilovich Cornell University
Margaret A. Neale
Margaret A. Neale Stanford University
Dale Griffin
Dale Griffin University of British Columbia
Aaron C. Kay
Aaron C. Kay Duke University
Teresa M. Amabile
Teresa M. Amabile Harvard University
Sonja Lyubomirsky
Sonja Lyubomirsky University of California, Riverside
Geoffrey L. Cohen
Geoffrey L. Cohen Stanford University
Max H. Bazerman
Max H. Bazerman Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree can unlock diverse online study options and open the door to rewarding career paths, including social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students are attracted to social work, but it’s important to understand the unique educational requirements in each state.

For example, if you are curious about social worker education requirements in Connecticut, you’ll need to know both degree and licensing requirements before practicing. In contrast, aspiring professionals should also check the Delaware minimum degree requirement for social workers to ensure their studies align with state mandates.

Likewise, the Florida education requirements for social workers may differ, particularly for those seeking roles in clinical practice. Meanwhile, the Georgia minimum degree requirement for social workers emphasizes specialized degrees and state-approved programs.

Carefully reviewing these state-specific guidelines will help you choose the right online degree and chart a clear pathway toward your chosen career in psychology or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Lee Ross

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles