World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roderick M. Kramer

Roderick M. Kramer

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
25477
World Ranking
5313
National Ranking
2906

Roderick M. Kramer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roderick M. Kramer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 98 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Roderick M. Kramer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roderick M. Kramer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roderick M. Kramer is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects involvement in several aspects of scientific research, though specific details on recent papers, co-authors, and publications are not publicly detailed.

Without available information on frequent co-authors or publication venues, the focus remains on their institutional connection, implying engagement in research activities at a leading academic institution.

There is no recorded data on main or subfields of study, main topics of work, or book publications that would further define the scholarly focus or thematic expertise of Roderick M. Kramer.

Similarly, no awards or formal recognitions are documented in the available data, providing no insight into distinctions or honors received throughout their career.

The absence of listed papers, co-authors, and publication venues limits the extent of detailed commentary on research trends or collaborative networks associated with the scientist.

Overall, Roderick M. Kramer's professional identity is linked primarily to Stanford University, a prominent research institution, indicating a potential role in academic research or teaching within that environment.

Best Publications

  • TRUST AND DISTRUST IN ORGANIZATIONS: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions

    Roderick M. Kramer

  • Swift trust and temporary groups.

    Debra Meyerson;Karl E. Weick;Roderick M. Kramer

  • Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing.

    Marilynn B. Brewer;Roderick M. Kramer

  • Members' Responses to Organizational Identity Threats: Encountering and Countering the Business Week Rankings

    Kimberly D. Elsbach;Roderick M. Kramer

  • Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma.

    Roderick M. Kramer;Marilynn B. Brewer

  • The Psychology of Intergroup Attitudes and Behavior

    Marilynn B. Brewer;Roderick M. Kramer

  • The sinister attribution error: Paranoid cognition and collective distrust in organizations

    Roderick M. Kramer

  • INDIVIDUAL ADAPTATIONS AND STRUCTURAL-CHANGE AS SOLUTIONS TO SOCIAL DILEMMAS

    David M. Messick;Henk Wilke;Marilynn B. Brewer;Roderick M. Kramer

  • Designing effective work groups

    Paul S. Goodman

  • Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision.

    Roderick M. Kramer;Marilynn B. Brewer;Benjamin A. Hanna

  • Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments.

    Kimberly D. Elsbach;Roderick M. Kramer

  • Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews

    Barry M. Staw;Larry L. Cummings;Robert I. Stutton;Roderick M. Kramer

  • Trust and Distrust In Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches

    Roderick Moreland Kramer;Karen S. Cook

  • The psychology of the social self

    Tom R. Tyler;Roderick Moreland Kramer;Oliver P. John

  • Repairing and Enhancing Trust: Approaches to Reducing Organizational Trust Deficits

    Roderick M. Kramer;Roy J. Lewicki

  • At the breaking point: Cognitive and social dynamics of revenge in organizations.

    Robert J. Bies;Thomas M. Tripp;Roderick M. Kramer

  • When in doubt…: Cooperation in a noisy prisoner's dilemma.

    Jonathan Bendor;Roderick M. Kramer;Suzanne Stout

  • Handbook of Heroism and Heroic Leadership

    Scott T. Allison;George R. Goethals;Roderick M. Kramer

  • Divergent realities and convergent disappointments in the hierarchic relation: Trust and the intuitive auditor at work.

    Roderick M. Kramer

  • Paranoid Cognition in Social Systems: Thinking and Acting in the Shadow of Doubt

    Roderick M. Kramer

  • Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis

    Roderick M Kramer;Charles G McClintock;David M Messick

  • Power and influence in organizations

    Roderick Moreland Kramer;Margaret Ann Neale

  • Trust and Intergroup Negotiation

    Roderick M. Kramer;Peter J. Carnevale

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Messick
David M. Messick Northwestern University
Kimberly D. Elsbach
Kimberly D. Elsbach University of California, Davis
Marilynn B. Brewer
Marilynn B. Brewer The Ohio State University
Tom R. Tyler
Tom R. Tyler Yale University
Karen S. Cook
Karen S. Cook Stanford University
George R. Goethals
George R. Goethals University of Richmond
Margaret A. Neale
Margaret A. Neale Stanford University
Oliver P. John
Oliver P. John University of California, Berkeley
Max H. Bazerman
Max H. Bazerman Harvard University
John T. Jost
John T. Jost New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a degree in psychology, exploring related online degree programs can open up a variety of career pathways. Graduates often pursue roles in mental health services, counseling, and social work. One in-demand area is substance abuse counseling, where professionals play a critical role in supporting individuals overcoming addiction.

Requirements for becoming a counselor can differ based on location and type of practice. For example, the educational steps and Tulsa substance abuse counselors education requirements may not be identical to those in other cities. It’s also helpful to review state and city requirements if you are thinking about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Virginia Beach, becoming a substance abuse counselor in Washington DC, or how to become a substance abuse counselor in Wichita.

Many students choose online degrees in psychology for flexibility and access to specialized tracks. Whether you aim to work in substance abuse counseling or another field, understanding local licensure, accreditation, and continuing education requirements is essential for a successful career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Roderick M. Kramer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles