World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
31233
World Ranking
7678
National Ranking
759

Daniel M. Cable publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Cable sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 93 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel M. Cable D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Cable sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel M. Cable is affiliated with London Business School in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several areas within psychology and organizational behavior, focusing on aspects that influence workplace dynamics and employee well-being.

Their recent publications include:

  • "Consequences of perceiving organization members as a unified entity: Stronger attraction, but greater blame for member transgressions." (2021) in Journal of Applied Psychology
  • "Setting and Pushing Boundaries: Implications for Work-Life Balance, Well-Being, and Performance" (2020) in Academy of Management Proceedings
  • "Employer Branding: Extending Methodological and Theoretical Boundaries" (2020) in Academy of Management Proceedings
  • "How Contextual Cues Shape Employee Voice" (2022) in Academy of Management Proceedings
  • "Advances in self-narratives in, across, and beyond organizations" (2023) in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Grace Cormier (4 co-authored works)
  • Constantinos V. Coutifaris (3 co-authored works)
  • Hemant Kakkar (2 co-authored works)
  • Elana Feldman (2 co-authored works)
  • Laura M. Giurge (2 co-authored works)

Daniel M. Cable has a consistent presence in specific publication venues, including:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings (10 publications)
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (2 publications)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1 publication)
  • Journal of Graduate Medical Education (1 publication)
  • UNC Libraries (1 publication)

Their research intersects various subfields of study such as:

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • General Health Professions
  • Leadership and Management

Main topics covered in their work address both psychological and organizational themes, including:

  • Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues

Best Publications

  • Person–Organization Fit, Job Choice Decisions, and Organizational Entry☆

    Daniel M. Cable;Timothy A. Judge

  • The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions.

    Daniel M. Cable;D. Scott DeRue

  • Network Ties, Reputation, and the Financing of New Ventures

    Scott Shane;Daniel Cable

  • AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PREDICTORS OF EXECUTIVE CAREER SUCCESS

    Timothy A. Judge;Daniel M. Cable;John W. Boudreau;Robert D. Bretz

  • The value of value congruence.

    Jeffrey R. Edwards;Daniel M. Cable

  • APPLICANT PERSONALITY, ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, AND ORGANIZATION ATTRACTION

    Timothy A. Judge;Daniel M. Cable

  • Complementary and supplementary fit: a theoretical and empirical integration.

    Daniel M. Cable;Jeffrey R. Edwards

  • PAY PREFERENCES AND JOB SEARCH DECISIONS: A PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT PERSPECTIVE

    Daniel M. Cable;Timothy A. Judge

  • Interviewers' perceptions of person–organization fit and organizational selection decisions.

    Daniel M. Cable;Timothy A. Judge

  • SOCIALIZATION TACTICS AND PERSON‐ORGANIZATION FIT

    Daniel M. Cable;Charles K. Parsons

  • The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: preliminary test of a theoretical model.

    Timothy A. Judge;Daniel M. Cable

  • The Value of Organizational Reputation in the Recruitment Context: A Brand-Equity Perspective

    Daniel M. Cable;Daniel B. Turban

  • Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristics

    Daniel B. Turban;Daniel M. Cable

  • The phenomenology of fit: linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit.

    Jeffrey R. Edwards;Daniel M. Cable;Ian O. Williamson;Lisa Schurer Lambert

  • Establishing the dimensions, sources and value of job seekers' employer knowledge during recruitment

    Daniel M. Cable;Daniel B. Turban

  • Are You Attracted? Do You Intend to Pursue? A Recruiting Policy-Capturing Study

    Lynda Aiman-Smith;Talya N. Bauer;Daniel M. Cable

  • A PRISONER'S DILEMMA APPROACH TO ENTREPRENEUR-VENTURE CAPITALIST RELATIONSHIPS

    Daniel M. Cable;Scott Shane

  • Socialization tactics, employee proactivity, and person-organization fit.

    Tae-Yeol Kim;Daniel M. Cable;Sang-Pyo Kim

  • The determinants of job seekers' reputation perceptions

    Daniel M. Cable;Mary E. Graham

  • Employee resistance to organizational change: Managerial influence tactics and leader-member exchange.

    Stacie A. Furst;Daniel M. Cable

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy A. Judge
Timothy A. Judge The Ohio State University
Francesca Gino
Francesca Gino Harvard University
Jeffrey R. Edwards
Jeffrey R. Edwards University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Daniel B. Turban
Daniel B. Turban University of Missouri
Kimberly D. Elsbach
Kimberly D. Elsbach University of California, Davis
Tim Wildschut
Tim Wildschut University of Southampton
Constantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides University of Southampton
D. Scott DeRue
D. Scott DeRue University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Julian Birkinshaw
Julian Birkinshaw London Business School
Jeffrey W. Sherman
Jeffrey W. Sherman University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens a variety of career pathways, especially in the rapidly growing field of mental health counseling. Many students are choosing online degree programs for their flexibility and accessibility. These programs can provide foundational knowledge in psychological theories, human behavior, and counseling techniques—skills that are essential for becoming a qualified professional in the mental health sector.

Becoming a counselor isn’t just about earning a degree; it also involves understanding state-specific requirements and gaining relevant experience. Whether your interest is to become a mental health counselor in Lubbock, become a mental health counselor in Madison, or become a mental health counselor in Memphis, you’ll need to research licensure procedures and training in your desired area. Additionally, reviewing Mesa mental health counselor education requirements can give you further insights into what steps to take, from education to supervised practice. Online programs often align with these requirements, with many offering guidance on the best pathway to licensure and career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel M. Cable

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles