World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 73 2081 1909 1018 922 152 40609

David M. Mosser publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David M. Mosser between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David M. Mosser published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2011. 5 of the 159 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2011. 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1984 2025

159 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David M. Mosser: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 3
1985 2
1986 1
1987 2
1988 0
1989 0
1990 2
1991 0
1992 6
1993 3
1994 3
1995 3
1996 5
1997 2
1998 2
1999 7
2000 5
2001 6
2002 8
2003 2
2004 2
2005 3
2006 4
2007 6
2008 8
2009 6
2010 6
2011 9
2012 1
2013 5
2014 8
2015 9
2016 5
2017 3
2018 3
2019 3
2020 4
2021 4
2022 2
2023 1
2024 4
2025 1
Total 159
Download as CSV

David M. Mosser publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Mosser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 152–161 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 152 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189 152
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

David M. Mosser D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Mosser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184 73
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

David M. Mosser is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of medicine and immunology and microbiology, with a focus on subfields including immunology, public health, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and dermatology.

Their work is concentrated on key topics such as research on leishmaniasis studies, immune cells in cancer, immune cell function and interaction, Trypanosoma species research and implications, eosinophilic disorders and syndromes, interstitial lung diseases and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, as well as neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • Clinical & Experimental Immunology
  • Cellular and Molecular Immunology
  • Inflammation Research
  • Blood Advances

Co-authorship collaborations have involved researchers such as:

  • Luciana Polaco Covre
  • Carlos Henrique Fantecelle
  • Herbert Leonel de Matos Guedes
  • Aloísio Falqueto
  • Daniel Cláudio Oliveira Gomes

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by David M. Mosser include:

  • Macrophages and the maintenance of homeostasis, 2020, Cellular and Molecular Immunology
  • Macrophage polarization in intestinal inflammation and gut homeostasis, 2020, Inflammation Research
  • PD-1 Blockade Modulates Functional Activities of Exhausted-Like T Cell in Patients With Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, 2021, Frontiers in Immunology
  • The transition of M-CSF-derived human macrophages to a growth-promoting phenotype, 2020, Blood Advances
  • Transcriptomic landscape of skin lesions in cutaneous leishmaniasis reveals a strong CD8+ T cell immunosenescence signature linked to immunopathology, 2021, Immunology

Best Publications

  • Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation.

    David M. Mosser;Justin P. Edwards

  • Macrophage Activation and Polarization: Nomenclature and Experimental Guidelines

    Peter J Murray;Judith E Allen;Subhra K Biswas;Edward A Fisher

  • The many faces of macrophage activation

    David M. Mosser

  • The Isolation and Characterization of Murine Macrophages

    Xia Zhang;Ricardo Goncalves;David M. Mosser

  • Interleukin‐10: new perspectives on an old cytokine

    David M. Mosser;Xia Zhang

  • Biochemical and functional characterization of three activated macrophage populations

    Justin P. Edwards;Xia Zhang;Kenneth A. Frauwirth;David M. Mosser

  • Macrophage activation by endogenous danger signals

    X Zhang;DM Mosser

  • The Role of IL-10 in Promoting Disease Progression in Leishmaniasis

    Margaret Mentink Kane;David M. Mosser

  • Role of the Leishmania surface protease gp63 in complement fixation, cell adhesion, and resistance to complement-mediated lysis.

    A Brittingham;C J Morrison;W R McMaster;B S McGwire

  • Intrinsic antibody-dependent enhancement of microbial infection in macrophages: disease regulation by immune complexes.

    Scott B Halstead;Suresh Mahalingam;Mary A Marovich;Sukathida Ubol

  • Monocyte subpopulations and their differentiation patterns during infection

    Dalit Strauss-Ayali;Sean M. Conrad;David M. Mosser

  • Selective Suppression of Interleukin-12 Induction after Macrophage Receptor Ligation

    Fayyaz S. Sutterwala;Gary J. Noel;Raphael Clynes;David M. Mosser

  • Macrophages and the maintenance of homeostasis.

    David M Mosser;Kajal Hamidzadeh;Ricardo Goncalves

  • NF-κB1 (p50) Homodimers Differentially Regulate Pro- and Anti-inflammatory Cytokines in Macrophages *

    Shanjin Cao;Xia Zhang;Justin P. Edwards;David M. Mosser

  • A novel phenotype for an activated macrophage: the type 2 activated macrophage.

    Charles F. Anderson;David M. Mosser

  • Reversal of Proinflammatory Responses by Ligating the Macrophage Fcγ Receptor Type I

    Fayyaz S. Sutterwala;Gary J. Noel;Padmini Salgame;David M. Mosser

  • Macrophages and the Recovery from Acute and Chronic Inflammation

    Kajal Hamidzadeh;Stephen M Christensen;Elizabeth Dalby;Prabha Chandrasekaran

  • Reversing Lipopolysaccharide Toxicity by Ligating the Macrophage Fcγ Receptors

    Jeffrey S. Gerber;David M. Mosser

  • FcgammaRI (CD64) contributes substantially to severity of arthritis, hypersensitivity responses, and protection from bacterial infection.

    A Ioan-Facsinay;S.J de Kimpe;S.M.M Hellwig;P.L van Lent

  • The mouse macrophage receptor for C3bi (CR3) is a major mechanism in the phagocytosis of Leishmania promastigotes.

    D M Mosser;P J Edelson

  • Production of a hemolytic factor by Candida albicans.

    J M Manns;D M Mosser;H R Buckley

  • Erratum: Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation

    David M. Mosser;Justin P. Edwards

Frequent Co-Authors

Najib M. El-Sayed
Najib M. El-Sayed University of Maryland, College Park
Phillip Scott
Phillip Scott University of Pennsylvania
Edgar M. Carvalho
Edgar M. Carvalho Federal University of Bahia
Sam W. Joseph
Sam W. Joseph University of Maryland, College Park
Katya Ravid
Katya Ravid Boston University
Eric P. Hoffman
Eric P. Hoffman Binghamton University
Irina A. Udalova
Irina A. Udalova University of Oxford
Toby Lawrence
Toby Lawrence King's College London
Stefanie N. Vogel
Stefanie N. Vogel University of Maryland, Baltimore
Maria Norma Melo
Maria Norma Melo Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in immunology often intersects with various health science disciplines, especially nursing. For those interested in advancing clinical expertise, understanding how much does a dnp make can motivate graduates to explore Doctor of Nursing Practice programs, which are increasingly available online.

Registered nurses or family nurse practitioners may seek specialization by transitioning to roles such as an acute care nurse practitioner. If you want to understand this progression better, resources on how to transition from fnp to acute care np can provide valuable guidance for making that career shift.

For individuals looking to accelerate their path, exploring the best accelerated nurse practitioner online programs can be a great option. These programs offer flexible, intensive curricula that help students complete their degrees faster while balancing personal commitments.

Beginners without a nursing background should consider starting with foundational education like online adn programs for non nurses, which open doors to advanced nursing roles and ultimately career paths in clinical immunology-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Mosser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles