World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
3554
World Ranking
11220
National Ranking
1091

Ray Norbury publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray Norbury sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 92 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ray Norbury D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray Norbury sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ray Norbury is affiliated with Brunel University London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with notable contributions to the understanding of circadian rhythms, sleep disorders, and related psychological processes.

The scientist's work includes 19 publications classified under neuroscience and 17 in psychology. More specifically, their research touches on several subfields such as experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, endocrine and autonomic systems, clinical psychology, and psychiatry and mental health.

Main topics addressed by Norbury's research include sleep and related disorders, circadian rhythm and melatonin, psychological and temporal perspectives research, sleep and wakefulness research, neural and behavioral psychology studies, COVID-19 and mental health, and EEG and brain-computer interfaces.

Norbury has published multiple papers, some of which are:

  • Beyond sleep: A multidimensional model of chronotype, 2023, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Diurnal preference and depressive symptomatology: a meta-analysis, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Associations between diurnal preference, impulsivity and substance use in a young-adult student sample, 2020, Chronobiology International
  • Diurnal Preference and Grey Matter Volume in a Large Population of Older Adults: Data from the UK Biobank, 2020, Journal of Circadian Rhythms
  • Associations between number of siblings, birth order, eating rate and adiposity in children and adults, 2021, Clinical Obesity

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Norbury include:

  • Veena Kumari (8 publications)
  • Ulrich Ettinger (6 publications)
  • Satyam Chauhan (5 publications)
  • Martina Vanova (4 publications)
  • Kaja Faßbender (3 publications)

Norbury's research appears regularly in journals and venues such as:

  • Chronobiology International (3 publications)
  • Journal of Circadian Rhythms (2 publications)
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Scientific Reports
  • npj Mental Health Research

Best Publications

  • Effect of a single dose of citalopram on amygdala response to emotional faces

    Susannah E. Murphy;Raymond Norbury;Ursula D. O'Sullivan;Philip J. Cowen

  • Short-term SSRI treatment normalises amygdala hyperactivity in depressed patients.

    B. R. Godlewska;R. Norbury;Sudhakar Selvaraj;P. J. Cowen

  • The effect of the serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) on amygdala function: a meta-analysis.

    S. E. Murphy;R. Norbury;B. R. Godlewska;P. J. Cowen

  • Early changes in emotional processing as a marker of clinical response to SSRI treatment in depression.

    Beata Godlewska;Michael Browning;Ray Norbury;Phil Cowen

  • Risk for depression and neural responses to fearful facial expressions of emotion.

    Stella W. Y. Chan;Ray Norbury;Guy M. Goodwin;Catherine J. Harmer

  • Short-term antidepressant treatment and facial processing. Functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Ray Norbury;Clare E Mackay;Philip J Cowen;Guy M Goodwin

  • The neuroprotective effects of estrogen on the aging brain.

    Ray Norbury;William J Cutter;Jacqueline Compton;Dene M Robertson

  • Short-term antidepressant treatment modulates amygdala response to happy faces

    Ray Norbury;Matthew J. Taylor;Sudhakar Selvaraj;Susannah E. Murphy

  • Predicting Treatment Response in Depression: The Role of Anterior Cingulate Cortex.

    Beata R Godlewska;Beata R Godlewska;Michael Browning;Michael Browning;Ray Norbury;Artemis Igoumenou

  • Hippocampal volume in vulnerability and resilience to depression.

    Stella W Y Chan;Stella W Y Chan;Catherine J Harmer;Ray Norbury;Ursula O'Sullivan

  • Short-term antidepressant administration reduces negative self-referential processing in the medial prefrontal cortex in subjects at risk for depression

    M Di Simplicio;M Di Simplicio;R Norbury;R Norbury;C J Harmer

  • The effects of reboxetine on emotional processing in healthy volunteers: an fMRI study

    R Norbury;C E Mackay;P J Cowen;G M Goodwin

  • A single dose of mirtazapine modulates neural responses to emotional faces in healthy people

    Nancy B. Rawlings;Ray Norbury;Philip J. Cowen;Catherine J. Harmer

  • Frontolimbic responses to emotional faces in young people at familial risk of depression.

    Zola N. Mannie;Matthew J. Taylor;Catherine J. Harmer;Philip J. Cowen

  • Affective modulation of anterior cingulate cortex in young people at increased familial risk of depression

    Zola N. Mannie;Ray Norbury;Susannah E. Murphy;Becky Inkster

  • Increased neural response to fear in patients recovered from depression: a 3T functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    R. Norbury;Sudhakar Selvaraj;M. J. Taylor;C. Harmer

  • Risk for depression is associated with neural biases in emotional categorisation.

    Stella W.Y. Chan;Catherine J. Harmer;Guy M. Goodwin;Ray Norbury

  • Estrogen therapy and brain muscarinic receptor density in healthy females: a SPET study.

    Ray Norbury;Michael J. Travis;Kjell Erlandsson;Wendy Waddington;Wendy Waddington

  • Oestrogen, brain function, and neuropsychiatric disorders.

    W J Cutter;R Norbury;D G M Murphy

  • Time to think: Subjective sleep quality, trait anxiety and university start time.

    Ray Norbury;Simon Evans

  • Paradoxical effects of short-term antidepressant treatment in fMRI emotional processing models in volunteers with high neuroticism.

    M. Di Simplicio;R. Norbury;A. Reinecke;C. J. Harmer

Frequent Co-Authors

Catherine J. Harmer
Catherine J. Harmer University of Oxford
Philip J. Cowen
Philip J. Cowen University of Oxford
Declan G. Murphy
Declan G. Murphy King's College London
Guy M. Goodwin
Guy M. Goodwin University of Oxford
Jamie Near
Jamie Near Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Peter J. Ell
Peter J. Ell University College London
Michael Browning
Michael Browning University of Oxford
Michael C. Craig
Michael C. Craig King's College London
Jeffrey M. Brunstrom
Jeffrey M. Brunstrom University of Bristol
Federico E. Turkheimer
Federico E. Turkheimer King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of online programs and diverse career opportunities. Across the US, students are increasingly choosing counseling as a sought-after specialty. Many begin their journey by researching the popular counseling programs in the US, which provide flexibility and access to high-quality education, regardless of location.

Regional trends also play a significant role. For example, those interested in the popular counseling degrees in Texas will discover programs known for strong clinical skills preparation and community-based learning. Utah stands out too, offering some of the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Utah that emphasize both theoretical knowledge and practical experience.

For those concerned about the return on investment, it's wise to investigate the most valuable counseling degrees in Arizona. These programs focus on career prospects, ensuring graduates are well-positioned for roles as licensed counselors, school psychologists, or mental health specialists.

Whether you pursue general psychology or specialize in counseling, online degrees offer flexible pathways to meaningful careers dedicated to mental wellness and personal development.

Best Scientists Citing Ray Norbury

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles