World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
14071
World Ranking
6306
National Ranking
3415

Hubert S. Feild publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hubert S. Feild sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 125 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Hubert S. Feild D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hubert S. Feild sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hubert S. Feild is affiliated with Auburn University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects engagement in higher education and research, centered at this institution.

Currently, there are no recorded recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, books, or specific research topics listed in the available data. This indicates that either these elements have not been documented or are not publicly accessible at this time.

As no detailed information on fields of study or subfields is available, the precise area of expertise for Hubert S. Feild remains unspecified.

Similarly, no awards or recognitions have been noted in the data. The scientist is not deceased, allowing the use of present tense in descriptions.

The lack of specific publications or collaborative networks limits the ability to provide a detailed overview of research impact or thematic focus.

Overall, Hubert S. Feild's profile is characterized by association with Auburn University without further publicly recorded academic output or distinctions.

Best Publications

  • Readiness for Organizational Change: The Systematic Development of a Scale.

    Daniel T. Holt;Achilles A. Armenakis;Hubert S. Feild;Stanley G. Harris

  • Human Resource Selection

    Robert D. Gatewood;Hubert S. Feild;Murray R. Barrick

  • Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens.

    Hubert S. Feild

  • Making change permanent A model for institutionalizing change interventions

    Achilles A. Armenakis;Stanley G. Harris;Hubert S. Feild

  • Transformational leadership, relationship quality, and employee performance during continuous incremental organizational change

    Min Z. Carter;Achilles A. Armenakis;Hubert S. Feild;Kevin W. Mossholder

  • Justice, Cynicism, and Commitment A Study of Important Organizational Change Variables

    Jeremy B. Bernerth;Achilles A. Armenakis;Hubert S. Feild;H. Jack Walker

  • Work centrality and work alienation: distinct aspects of a general commitment to work

    Robert R. Hirschfeld;Hubert S. Feild

  • Individual differences in servant leadership: the roles of values and personality

    Rynetta R. Washington;Charlotte D. Sutton;Hubert S. Feild

  • Toward a Comprehensive Definition of Readiness for Change: A Review of Research and Instrumentation

    Daniel T. Holt;Achilles A. Armenakis;Stanley G. Harris;Hubert S. Feild

  • Student Learning Motivation and Psychological Hardiness: Interactive Effects on Students' Reactions to a Management Class

    Michael S. Cole;Hubert S. Feild;Stanley G. Harris

  • Leader–member social exchange (LMSX): development and validation of a scale

    Jeremy B. Bernerth;Achilles A. Armenakis;Hubert S. Feild;William F. Giles

  • Work-life benefits and positive organizational behavior: is there a connection?

    Lori Muse;Stanley G. Harris;William F. Giles;Hubert S. Feild

  • Recruiters’ Perceptions and Use of Applicant Résumé Information: Screening the Recent Graduate

    Michael S. Cole;Robert S. Rubin;Hubert S. Feild;William F. Giles

  • Has the Inverted-U Theory of Stress and Job Performance Had a Fair Test?

    Lori A. Muse;Stanley G. Harris;Hubert S. Feild

  • Rape trials and jurors' decisions: A psycholegal analysis of the effects of victim, defendant, and case characteristics.

    Hubert S. Feild

  • Jurors and rape : a study in psychology and law

    Hubert S. Feild;Leigh B. Bienen

  • The Relationship of Group Process Variables and Team Performance A Team-Level Analysis in a Field Setting

    Mark H. Jordan;Hubert S. Feild;Achilles A. Armenakis

  • The measurement equivalence of web-based and paper-and-pencil measures of transformational leadership: A multinational test

    Michael S. Cole;Arthur G. Bedeian;Hubert S. Feild

  • Recruiters’ Inferences of Applicant Personality Based on Resume Screening: Do Paper People have a Personality?

    Michael S. Cole;Hubert S. Feild;William F. Giles;Stanley G. Harris

  • Is This How I Will Be Treated? Reducing Uncertainty through Recruitment Interactions

    H. Jack Walker;Talya N. Bauer;Michael S. Cole;Jeremy B. Bernerth

Frequent Co-Authors

Achilles A. Armenakis
Achilles A. Armenakis Auburn University
Michael S. Cole
Michael S. Cole Texas Christian University
Arthur G. Bedeian
Arthur G. Bedeian Louisiana State University
Kevin W. Mossholder
Kevin W. Mossholder Auburn University
Talya N. Bauer
Talya N. Bauer Portland State University
Murray R. Barrick
Murray R. Barrick Texas A&M University
Benjamin T. Hazen
Benjamin T. Hazen University of Dayton
Jeremy C. Short
Jeremy C. Short University of North Texas
Daniel T. Holt
Daniel T. Holt Mississippi State University
Mark C. Bolino
Mark C. Bolino University of Oklahoma

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a range of rewarding career paths. Many students are drawn to fields like therapy, counseling, and mental health support. Online psychology programs offer the flexibility to balance studies with other commitments, making them a popular choice for those seeking to enter specialized professions.

One in-demand career is becoming a marriage and family therapist (MFT). Each state and city often has its own specific licensure and training requirements. For example, you can learn about Albuquerque mft education requirements to see what’s expected in New Mexico. If you are considering a career in California, find guidance on how to become a marriage and family therapist in Anaheim.

Prospective therapists in other locations may want to check out Anchorage mft education requirements for Alaska or see a step-by-step guide on how to become an mft in Arlington, Texas. Understanding regional differences will help you select the online program best suited for your goals and set you on the right path to becoming a licensed professional.

Best Scientists Citing Hubert S. Feild

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles