World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
44307
World Ranking
3717
National Ranking
1774

Tomasz Imielinski publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomasz Imielinski sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 145 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Tomasz Imielinski D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomasz Imielinski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tomasz Imielinski is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the fields of Economics, Econometrics and Finance. The subfields of their work include Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, and Visual Arts and Performing Arts.

The main topics covered by Tomasz Imielinski's research include Game Theory and Applications, Game Theory and Voting Systems, Economic Theories and Models, as well as Art History and Market Analysis.

They have contributed papers published in the venue arXiv (Cornell University). These include:

  • Ranking by Momentum based on Pareto ordering of entities (2021, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • Lists of Top Artists to Watch computed algorithmically (2021, arXiv (Cornell University))

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on algorithmic ranking methods and applications intersecting economics and art market analysis.

Best Publications

  • Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases

    Rakesh Agrawal;Tomasz Imieliński;Arun Swami

  • Database mining: a performance perspective

    R. Agrawal;T. Imielinski;A. Swami

  • Incomplete Information in Relational Databases

    Tomasz Imieliński;Witold Lipski

  • Mobile wireless computing: challenges in data management

    Tomasz Imielinski;B. R. Badrinath

  • Data on air: organization and access

    T. Imielinski;S. Viswanathan;B.R. Badrinath

  • Mobile Computing

    Tomasz Imielinski;Henry F. Korth

  • A database perspective on knowledge discovery

    Tomasz Imielinski;Heikki Mannila

  • GeoCast—geographic addressing and routing

    Julio C. Navas;Tomasz Imielinski

  • Sleepers and workaholics: caching strategies in mobile environments

    Daniel Barbará;Tomasz Imieliński

  • Metropolitan area video-on-demand service using pyramid broadcasting

    S. Viswanathan;T. Imielinski

  • Energy efficient indexing on air

    Tomasz Imielinski;S. Viswanathan;B. R. Badrinath

  • An Interval Classifier for Database Mining Applications

    Rakesh Agrawal;Sakti P. Ghosh;Tomasz Imielinski;Balakrishna R. Iyer

  • MSQL: A Query Language for Database Mining

    Tomasz Imieliński;Aashu Virmani

  • Method and system for placing advertisements in a computer network

    Shamin Abbas Naqvi;Tomasz Imielinski

  • Prediction-based monitoring in sensor networks: taking lessons from MPEG

    Samir Goel;Tomasz Imielinski

  • Pyramid broadcasting for video-on-demand service

    Subramaniyam R. Viswanathan;Tomasz Imieliński

  • Querying in Highly Mobile Distributed Environments

    Tomasz Imielinski;B. R. Badrinath

  • Sleepers and workaholics: caching strategies in mobile environments (extended version)

    Daniel Barbará;Tomasz Imieliński

  • Power efficient filtering of data on air

    T. Imieliński;S. Viswanathan;B. R. Badrinath

  • GPS-based geographic addressing, routing, and resource discovery

    Tomasz Imieliński;Julio C. Navas

  • Sleepers and Workaholics: Caching Strategies in Mobile Environments

    Daniel Barbará;Tomasz Imielinski

Frequent Co-Authors

Arup Acharya
Arup Acharya IBM (United States)
Daniel Barbará
Daniel Barbará George Mason University
Badri Nath
Badri Nath Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jan Chomicki
Jan Chomicki University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Henry F. Korth
Henry F. Korth Lehigh University
Kaan Ozbay
Kaan Ozbay New York University
Ramakrishnan Srikant
Ramakrishnan Srikant Google (United States)
Heikki Mannila
Heikki Mannila Aalto University
Michael J. Carey
Michael J. Carey University of California, Irvine
Christos Faloutsos
Christos Faloutsos Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of related fields and online learning options. Many students consider pairing their undergraduate degree with an advanced program to expand opportunities and specialize skills.

Master’s degrees online are a popular next step, and it’s important to compare options based on affordability and relevance. Check out the cheapest masters degrees for a comprehensive list of cost-effective programs.

For those interested in the intersection of technology and business, an online executive mba cost breakdown can help you evaluate your return on investment in leadership roles.

If information management appeals to you, consider pursuing an mlis (Master of Library and Information Science), a program that blends technology, research, and data curation.

Lastly, those aiming for top leadership positions may explore a phd in organizational leadership for strategic careers in management, academia, or consultancy.

Best Scientists Citing Tomasz Imielinski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles