World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
15455
World Ranking
6676
National Ranking
2947

Henry F. Korth publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry F. Korth sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 156 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Henry F. Korth D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry F. Korth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to the principles and practice of database management.
  • 2000 - ACM Fellow For significant and lasting influence to principles and practice of database management. Service to community via a bestseller undergraduate textbook, student mentoring and leadership role in industry.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • Database
  • Programming language

His main research concerns Database, Database schema, Programming language, Database transaction and Database design. He is involved in the study of Database that focuses on Service in particular. His Database schema research integrates issues from Distributed concurrency control, Multiversion concurrency control, Non-lock concurrency control and Database tuning.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Conceptual schema and Data model. Henry F. Korth has included themes like Computer security, Software engineering and Group in his Database transaction study. The study incorporates disciplines such as Mathematical proof, Universal relation assumption, Comprehension and Implementation in addition to Database design.

His most cited work include:

  • Database System Concepts (1227 citations)
  • Mobile Computing (852 citations)
  • Semantics and implementation of schema evolution in object-oriented databases (643 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Henry F. Korth spends much of his time researching Distributed computing, Database, Database transaction, Serializability and Concurrency control. His study focuses on the intersection of Distributed computing and fields such as Consistency with connections in the field of Replication. His research integrates issues of Process and Information retrieval in his study of Database.

His research in Database transaction intersects with topics in Correctness, Commit and Concurrency. His Serializability research includes themes of Global serializability, Two-phase locking, Isolation and Commitment ordering. His Concurrency control study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Scalability and Scheduling.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Distributed computing (25.36%)
  • Database (24.64%)
  • Database transaction (22.46%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2002-2019)?

  • Database (24.64%)
  • Information retrieval (9.42%)
  • Database transaction (22.46%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Database, Information retrieval, Database transaction, Concurrency control and Library science. His Database research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Computer program and Request for information. His study on Information retrieval also encompasses disciplines like

  • XML database which intersects with area such as XSL, Document Structure Description, XML schema and Database design,
  • XML validation that connect with fields like Relational calculus and Relational database management system.

As part of the same scientific family, Henry F. Korth usually focuses on Database transaction, concentrating on Scalability and intersecting with Concurrent computing. His Concurrency control research incorporates themes from Commit, Concurrency and Serialization. His Distributed computing study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Serializability, Non-lock concurrency control, Isolation, Two-phase commit protocol and Multiversion concurrency control.

Between 2002 and 2019, his most popular works were:

  • The Claremont report on database research (125 citations)
  • Method and apparatus for updating XML views of relational data (75 citations)
  • Computer implemented method and apparatus for fulfilling a request for information content with a user-selectable version of a file containing that information content (75 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • Database
  • Programming language

His primary areas of investigation include World Wide Web, Information retrieval, Database, Metaverse and XML validation. Henry F. Korth has researched World Wide Web in several fields, including Cover, SPARK and Shared resource. Henry F. Korth interconnects Computer program, Hyperlink, Request for information and Selection in the investigation of issues within Information retrieval.

His Database study combines topics in areas such as Software pipelining, Pentium, Operating system, Speedup and Algorithm. His XML validation research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in XSL, Streaming XML, XML database and XML Schema Editor. Many of his studies on XML Schema Editor apply to Database design as well.

Best Publications

  • Database System Concepts

    Henry F. Korth;Abraham Silberschatz

  • Semantics and implementation of schema evolution in object-oriented databases

    Jay Banerjee;Won Kim;Hyoung-Joo Kim;Henry F. Korth

  • Mobile Computing

    Tomasz Imielinski;Henry F. Korth

  • Extended algebra and calculus for nested relational databases

    Mark A. Roth;Herry F. Korth;Abraham Silberschatz

  • Database Systems Concepts

    Abraham Silberschatz;Henry F. Korth;S. Sudarshan

  • Covering indexes for branching path queries

    Raghav Kaushik;Philip Bohannon;Jeffrey F Naughton;Henry F Korth

  • A formal approach to recovery by compensating transactions

    Henry F. Korth;Eliezer levy;Abraham Silberschatz

  • Database system issues in nomadic computing

    Rafael Alonso;Henry F. Korth

  • The Claremont report on database research

    Rakesh Agrawal;Anastasia Ailamaki;Philip A. Bernstein;Eric A. Brewer

  • Locking Primitives in a Database System

    Henry F. Korth

  • A model of CAD transactions

    François Bancilhon;Won Kim;Henry F. Korth

  • A transaction model for multidatabase systems

    S. Mehrotra;R. Rastogi;A. Silberschatz;H.F. Korth

  • The Claremont report on database research

    Rakesh Agrawal;Anastasia Ailamaki;Philip A. Bernstein;Eric A. Brewer

  • SQL/NF: a query language for ¬ 1NF relational databases

    Mark A. Roth;Henry F. Korth;Don S. Batory

  • Replication, consistency, and practicality: are these mutually exclusive?

    Todd Anderson;Yuri Breitbart;Henry F. Korth;Avishai Wool

  • DataBlitz: A High Performance Main-Memory Storage Manager

    Jerry Baulier;Philip Bohannon;S. Gogate;S. Joshi

  • Real-time event processing system with service authoring environment

    Stephen M. Blott;Yuri Breitbart;Thomas M. Cliff;Frank Frastaci

  • Replication and consistency: being lazy helps sometimes

    Yuri Breitbart;Henry F. Korth

  • SYSTEM/U: a database system based on the universal relation assumption

    Henry F. Korth;Gabriel M. Kuper;Joan Feigenbaum;Allen van Gelder

  • On long-duration CAD transactions

    Henry F. Korth;Won Kim;François Bancilhon

  • Data models

    Avi Silberschatz;Henry F. Korth;S. Sudarshan

Frequent Co-Authors

Abraham Silberschatz
Abraham Silberschatz Yale University
Yuri Breitbart
Yuri Breitbart Kent State University
Rajeev Rastogi
Rajeev Rastogi Amazon (United States)
Sharad Mehrotra
Sharad Mehrotra University of California, Irvine
Viswanath Poosala
Viswanath Poosala Facebook (United States)
Sundararajarao Sudarshan
Sundararajarao Sudarshan Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
Gerhard Weikum
Gerhard Weikum Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Hector Garcia-Molina
Hector Garcia-Molina Stanford University
Daniel P. Lopresti
Daniel P. Lopresti Lehigh University
Tomasz Imielinski
Tomasz Imielinski Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right educational path in Computer Science can open doors to lucrative careers and future-proof your skills. If you are considering alternatives or complementary programs, exploring the best majors for the future can help you understand which fields offer strong employment prospects and align with tech trends.

For those seeking faster or more flexible graduate options, it’s useful to research what is the easiest masters degree. These programs can provide a streamlined pathway to career advancement, often balancing rigor with accessibility for working professionals.

Doctoral studies may seem out of reach, but there are increasingly affordable online doctoral programs available. These options allow you to advance your expertise in computer science or related fields without breaking the bank.

Additionally, if you are interested in education-focused leadership roles, considering the cheapest ed.d online program can help you earn a doctoral degree on a fast-track and at a lower cost.

With a range of online degrees and emerging career pathways, it’s easier than ever to tailor your education to your professional goals in the dynamic tech sector.

Best Scientists Citing Henry F. Korth

Trending Scientists