World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
73
Citations
29401
World Ranking
1552
National Ranking
809

David Maier publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Maier sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 346 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David Maier D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Maier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Maier is affiliated with Portland State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of computer science, with a focus on a range of subfields including artificial intelligence, instrumentation, biophysics, computer networks and communications, and signal processing.

Their work covers several main topics such as advanced optical sensing technologies, advanced fluorescence microscopy techniques, semantic web and ontologies, advanced database systems and queries, data management and algorithms, data quality and management, and data mining algorithms and applications.

David Maier has contributed to academic literature across various venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM SIGMOD Record
  • Energies
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

Notable recent papers by David Maier include:

  • Inductive Electrically Excited Synchronous Machine for Electrical Vehicles-Design, Optimization and Measurement, 2023, published in Energies
  • Count-Free Single-Photon 3D Imaging With Race Logic, 2023, published in IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • Support for Schema Evolution in Data Stream Management Systems, 2020, published in TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)
  • Effective Entity Augmentation by Querying External Data Sources, 2023, published in Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • GRETA: Graph-based Real-time Event Trend Aggregation, 2020, published via arXiv (Cornell University)

Their frequent collaborators include Atul Ingle, Olga Poppe, Chuan Lei, Elke A. Rundensteiner, and S. Müller, highlighting a multidisciplinary approach within their research network.

Best Publications

  • Theory of Relational Databases

    David Maier

  • The theory of relational databases

    David Maier

  • The Object-Oriented Database System Manifesto.

    Malcolm P. Atkinson;François Bancilhon;David J. DeWitt;Klaus R. Dittrich

  • From databases to dataspaces: a new abstraction for information management

    Michael Franklin;Alon Halevy;David Maier

  • On the Desirability of Acyclic Database Schemes

    Catriel Beeri;Ronald Fagin;David Maier;Mihalis Yannakakis

  • Magic Sets and Other Strange Ways to Implement Logic Programs.

    François Bancilhon;David Maier;Yehoshua Sagiv;Jeffrey D. Ullman

  • The Complexity of Some Problems on Subsequences and Supersequences

    David Maier

  • Magic sets and other strange ways to implement logic programs (extended abstract)

    Francois Bancilhon;David Maier;Yehoshua Sagiv;Jeffrey D Ullman

  • Development of an object-oriented DBMS

    David Maier;Jacob Stein;Allen Otis;Alan Purdy

  • The object-oriented database system manifesto

    Malcolm Atkinson;David Dewitt;David Maier;Francois Bancilhon

  • Making smalltalk a database system

    George Copeland;David Maier

  • Readings in object-oriented database systems

    Stanley B. Zdonik;David Maier

  • Testing implications of data dependencies

    Unknown

  • Linear road: a stream data management benchmark

    Arvind Arasu;Mitch Cherniack;Eduardo Galvez;David Maier

  • Principles of dataspace systems

    Alon Halevy;Michael Franklin;David Maier

  • Exploiting punctuation semantics in continuous data streams

    P.A. Tucker;D. Maier;T. Sheard;L. Fegaras

  • The Asilomar report on database research

    Phil Bernstein;Michael Brodie;Stefano Ceri;David DeWitt

  • No pane, no gain: efficient evaluation of sliding-window aggregates over data streams

    Jin Li;David Maier;Kristin Tufte;Vassilis Papadimos

  • Semantics and evaluation techniques for window aggregates in data streams

    Jin Li;David Maier;Kristin Tufte;Vassilis Papadimos

  • On the foundations of the universal relation model

    David Maier;Jeffrey D. Ullman;Moshe Y. Vardi

  • Development of an object-oriented DBMS

    David Maier;Jacob Stein;Allen Ortis;Alan Purdy

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey D. Ullman
Jeffrey D. Ullman Stanford University
Bill Howe
Bill Howe University of Washington
David J. DeWitt
David J. DeWitt University of Wisconsin–Madison
Stanley B. Zdonik
Stanley B. Zdonik Brown University
Jonathan Walpole
Jonathan Walpole Portland State University
Goetz Graefe
Goetz Graefe Google (United States)
Alon Halevy
Alon Halevy Facebook (United States)
Joseph M. Hellerstein
Joseph M. Hellerstein University of California, Berkeley
Jonathan Goldstein
Jonathan Goldstein Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees has become increasingly popular among students aiming to study Computer Science in the USA. There’s a wide variety of accessible options, from associate degrees up to doctorates, each with benefits and considerations.

Budget and time constraints are top concerns for many learners. If you want to minimize costs while reaching the highest level of academic achievement, you can look into affordable phd programs online. These degree paths allow you to advance your education and career without the high price tag.

For educators and professionals seeking leadership roles, there are also fastest online edd programs offering accelerated pathways to a doctoral degree.

Looking to start your career quickly? Consider an accelerated associate degree that can be completed in as little as six months. This is a great entry point into tech-related fields.

Finally, if you aim for versatility and want to balance technical knowledge with management skills, investigate a business management degree online cost to discover affordable options for broadening your career horizons.

Best Scientists Citing David Maier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles