World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
10707
World Ranking
5089
National Ranking
2357

Jonathan Walpole publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Walpole sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 187 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jonathan Walpole D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Walpole sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan Walpole is affiliated with Portland State University in the United States. Their research encompasses diverse areas within computer science, contributing to multiple subfields and topics related to distributed systems, parallel computing, and artificial intelligence.

Their main field of study is Computer Science, with a particular focus on the following subfields:

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Safety Research
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Key topics of research addressed by Jonathan Walpole include:

  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy

Jonathan Walpole has contributed to at least two papers in recent years. The first, published in 2020, is titled RCU Usage In the Linux Kernel and appeared in the ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review. The second paper, published in 2025, is Manipulation Attacks by Misaligned AI: Risk Analysis and Safety Case Framework, available through arXiv (Cornell University).

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Paul E. McKenney
  • Joel Fernandes
  • Silas Boyd-Wickizer
  • Rishane Dassanayake
  • Mario Demetroudi

Jonathan Walpole's publications have appeared primarily in the following venues:

  • ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • StackGuard: automatic adaptive detection and prevention of buffer-overflow attacks

    Crispin Cowan;Calton Pu;Dave Maier;Heather Hintony

  • Buffer overflows: attacks and defenses for the vulnerability of the decade

    C. Cowan;F. Wagle;Calton Pu;S. Beattie

  • A feedback-driven proportion allocator for real-rate scheduling

    David C. Steere;Ashvin Goel;Joshua Gruenberg;Dylan McNamee

  • Research challenges in environmental observation and forecasting systems

    David C. Steere;Antonio Baptista;Dylan McNamee;Calton Pu

  • Optimistic incremental specialization: streamlining a commercial operating system

    C. Pu;T. Autrey;A. Black;C. Consel

  • A Distributed Real-Time MPEG Video Audio Player

    Shanwei Cen;Calton Pu;Richard Staehli;Crispin Cowan

  • A traffic characterization of popular on-line games

    Wu-chang Feng;Francis Chang;Wu-chi Feng;Jonathan Walpole

  • Performance of memory reclamation for lockless synchronization

    Thomas E. Hart;Paul E. Mckenney;Angela Demke Brown;Jonathan Walpole

  • Buffer overflows: attacks and defenses for the vulnerability of the decade

    C. Cowan;P. Wagle;C. Pu;S. Beattie

  • User-Level Implementations of Read-Copy Update

    M. Desnoyers;P. E. McKenney;A. S. Stern;M. R. Dagenais

  • Provisioning on-line games: a traffic analysis of a busy counter-strike server

    Francis Chang;Wu-chang Feng;Wu-chi Feng;Jonathan Walpole

  • Analysis of a reservation-based feedback scheduler

    L. Abeni;L. Palopoli;G. Lipari;J. Walpole

  • MPVM: A Migration Transparent Version of PVM

    Jeremy Casas;Dan Clark;Rabi Konuru;Steve Otto

  • Exploiting deferred destruction: an analysis of read-copy-update techniques in operating system kernels

    Paul E. Mckenney;Jonathan Walpole

  • Flow and Congestion Control for Internet Media Streaming Applications

    Shanwei Cen;Calton Pu;Jonathan Walpole

  • A measurement-based analysis of the real-time performance of linux

    L. Abeni;A. Goel;C. Krasic;J. Snow

  • Quality-adaptive media streaming by priority drop

    Charles Krasic;Jonathan Walpole;Wu-chi Feng

  • Priority progress multicast streaming for quality-adaptive transmission of data

    Jonathan Walpole;Charles Krasic

  • Adaptive load migration systems for PVM

    Jeremy Casas;Ravi Konuru;Steve W. Otto;Robert Prouty

  • The Case for Streaming Multimedia with TCP

    Charles Krasic;Kang Li;Jonathan Walpole

Frequent Co-Authors

Calton Pu
Calton Pu Georgia Institute of Technology
Paul E. McKenney
Paul E. McKenney Facebook (United States)
Wu-chi Feng
Wu-chi Feng Portland State University
David Maier
David Maier Portland State University
Gordon S. Blair
Gordon S. Blair Lancaster University
Charles Consel
Charles Consel Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux
Wu-chang Feng
Wu-chang Feng Portland State University
David Hutchison
David Hutchison Lancaster University
Ling Liu
Ling Liu Georgia Institute of Technology
Luca Abeni
Luca Abeni Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Computer Science opens pathways to a variety of online programs and career options. For those interested in a quicker start, many institutions offer easy online associate degrees. These programs are ideal if you want to enter the tech field quickly or lay a solid foundation before transferring to a bachelor’s program.

If you’re considering a specialized field, there are programs like the edd in educational leadership for those passionate about technology’s role in education management. For a creative career, you can also explore game design masters online, which provides advanced skills for designing and developing interactive digital experiences.

As you compare degrees, be sure to choose institutions recognized for quality. Many options are listed among highly accredited online universities, ensuring your education is respected by employers. Selecting the right online pathway will help you achieve both your academic and career goals in Computer Science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Walpole

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles