World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
8263
World Ranking
8322
National Ranking
3569

Bill Howe publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bill Howe sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 160 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bill Howe D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bill Howe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bill Howe is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and works primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their research spans several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Transportation, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Safety Research.

The topics regularly covered in Howe's research include:

  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility

Howe has published multiple papers, some of the recent ones are:

  • Responsible data management, 2020, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • SPORES, 2020, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • Responsible data management, 2022, Communications of the ACM
  • Fairness-Aware Demand Prediction for New Mobility, 2020, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Database Repair Meets Algorithmic Fairness, 2020, ACM SIGMOD Record

Frequent publication venues for Howe include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM SIGMOD Record
  • Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • Communications of the ACM

Collaborations are a part of Howe's research practice, with frequent co-authors comprising:

  • Julia Stoyanovich
  • Alexis Hiniker
  • Robert Wolfe
  • Lucas Rosenblatt
  • Bernease Herman

Best Publications

  • HaLoop: efficient iterative data processing on large clusters

    Yingyi Bu;Bill Howe;Magdalena Balazinska;Michael D. Ernst

  • Voyager: Exploratory Analysis via Faceted Browsing of Visualization Recommendations

    Kanit Wongsuphasawat;Dominik Moritz;Anushka Anand;Jock Mackinlay

  • SkewTune: mitigating skew in mapreduce applications

    YongChul Kwon;Magdalena Balazinska;Bill Howe;Jerome Rolia

  • Formalizing Visualization Design Knowledge as Constraints: Actionable and Extensible Models in Draco

    Dominik Moritz;Chenglong Wang;Greg L. Nelson;Halden Lin

  • Voyager 2: Augmenting Visual Analysis with Partial View Specifications

    Kanit Wongsuphasawat;Zening Qu;Dominik Moritz;Riley Chang

  • The BigDAWG Polystore System

    Jennie Duggan;Aaron J. Elmore;Michael Stonebraker;Magda Balazinska

  • Skew-resistant parallel processing of feature-extracting scientific user-defined functions

    YongChul Kwon;Magdalena Balazinska;Bill Howe;Jerome Rolia

  • Query-Based Data Pricing

    Paraschos Koutris;Prasang Upadhyaya;Magdalena Balazinska;Bill Howe

  • The HaLoop approach to large-scale iterative data analysis

    Yingyi Bu;Bill Howe;Magdalena Balazinska;Michael D. Ernst

  • VizDeck: self-organizing dashboards for visual analytics

    Alicia Key;Bill Howe;Daniel Perry;Cecilia Aragon

  • Data markets in the cloud: an opportunity for the database community

    Magdalena Balazinska;Bill Howe;Dan Suciu

  • Demonstration of the Myria big data management service

    Daniel Halperin;Victor Teixeira de Almeida;Lee Lee Choo;Shumo Chu

  • Interventional Fairness: Causal Database Repair for Algorithmic Fairness

    Babak Salimi;Luke Rodriguez;Bill Howe;Dan Suciu

  • Hadoop's adolescence: an analysis of Hadoop usage in scientific workloads

    Kai Ren;YongChul Kwon;Magdalena Balazinska;Bill Howe

  • DataSynthesizer: Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Datasets

    Haoyue Ping;Julia Stoyanovich;Bill Howe

  • A demonstration of the BigDAWG polystore system

    A. Elmore;J. Duggan;M. Stonebraker;M. Balazinska

  • Query-based data pricing

    Paraschos Koutris;Prasang Upadhyaya;Magdalena Balazinska;Bill Howe

  • Virtual Appliances, Cloud Computing, and Reproducible Research

    Bill Howe

  • Towards a general-purpose query language for visualization recommendation

    Kanit Wongsuphasawat;Dominik Moritz;Anushka Anand;Jock Mackinlay

  • A Nutritional Label for Rankings

    Ke Yang;Julia Stoyanovich;Abolfazl Asudeh;Bill Howe

  • The BigDAWG Polystore System

    Jennie Duggan;Stan Zdonik;Aaron J. Elmore;Michael Stonebraker

Frequent Co-Authors

Magdalena Balazinska
Magdalena Balazinska University of Washington
Dan Suciu
Dan Suciu University of Washington
David Maier
David Maier Portland State University
Hosagrahar V. Jagadish
Hosagrahar V. Jagadish University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jeffrey Heer
Jeffrey Heer University of Washington
Bruce D. Cornuelle
Bruce D. Cornuelle University of California, San Diego
Edward D. Lazowska
Edward D. Lazowska University of Washington
Peter F. Worcester
Peter F. Worcester University of California, San Diego
Walter Munk
Walter Munk University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and career paths. Students seeking affordable options can explore the least expensive online bachelor's degree programs. These offer foundational skills in computing while keeping tuition manageable, making them ideal for cost-conscious learners.

Aspiring engineers can benefit from investigating the cheapest online engineering degree options. These programs deliver critical technical knowledge necessary for various IT and engineering fields, all through flexible online formats.

For those with leadership ambitions, understanding the online executive mba cost is key. An Executive MBA can prepare tech professionals for management roles, and affordable online programs make this advancement more accessible.

Additionally, tech-savvy students interested in data, research, or digital management might explore an online mlis (Master of Library and Information Science). This degree broadens career options in information science, digital archiving, and more.

By considering these related pathways, students can tailor their studies and future careers to match their interests while also controlling costs.

Best Scientists Citing Bill Howe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles