World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Miguel A. Losada

Miguel A. Losada

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
6917
World Ranking
6471
National Ranking
182

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
42
Citations
6095
World Ranking
6662
National Ranking
160

Miguel A. Losada publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miguel A. Losada sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 286 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Miguel A. Losada D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miguel A. Losada sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Miguel A. Losada is affiliated with the University of Granada in Spain. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Engineering, with a total of 35 and 17 publications in these fields, respectively. The scientist's work spans several subfields, including Earth-Surface Processes, Civil and Structural Engineering, Oceanography, Ecology, and Atmospheric Science.

The main topics covered in their research comprise Coastal and Marine Dynamics, Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing, Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics, Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research, Earthquake and Tsunami Effects, Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, and Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures.

Miguel A. Losada has contributed to multiple papers in renowned scientific journals. Selected recent publications include:

  • Coastal green infrastructure to mitigate coastal squeeze, 2021, Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience
  • 2D water-wave interaction with permeable and impermeable slopes: Dimensional analysis and experimental overview, 2020, Coastal Engineering
  • Flood management challenges in transitional environments: Assessing the effects of sea-level rise on compound flooding in the 21st century, 2021, Coastal Engineering
  • Bulk Wave Dissipation in the Armor Layer of Slope Rock and Cube Armored Breakwaters, 2020, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
  • Air flow quality analysis of an open-circuit boundary layer wind tunnel and comparison with a closed-circuit wind tunnel, 2020, Physics of Fluids

The frequent collaboration network includes María Clavero, Pilar Díaz-Carrasco, Luca Chiapponi, María Victoria Moragues, and Sandro Longo. María Clavero is the most frequent coauthor with 12 joint publications, followed by Pilar Díaz-Carrasco and Luca Chiapponi, each with 5 coauthored papers.

Miguel A. Losada's research outputs are often published in venues such as Coastal Engineering, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, Coastal Engineering Proceedings, Ocean Engineering, and Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans. Coastal Engineering is the predominant venue, reflecting a strong focus on coastal-related scientific inquiries.

Best Publications

  • Reflection and transmission from porous structures under oblique wave attack

    Robert A. Dalrymple;Miguel A. Losada;P. A. Martin

  • Hydrodynamics induced by wind waves in a vegetation field

    Fernando J. Méndez;Iñigo J. Losada;Miguel A. Losada

  • 3-D non-breaking regular wave interaction with submerged breakwaters

    I.J. Losada;R. Silva;M.A. Losada

  • PROPAGATION OF OBLIQUE INCIDENT WAVES PAST RIGID VERTICAL THIN BARRIERS

    Iñigo J. Losada;Miguel A. Losada;Antonio J. Roldán

  • Harmonic generation past a submerged porous step

    I J Losada;Michael D Patterson;M A Losada

  • Flow characteristics on rough, permeable slopes under wave action

    Miguel A. Losada;Luis A. Giménez-Curto

  • Characteristics of Solitary Wave Breaking Induced by Breakwaters

    Stéphan T. Grilli;Miguel A. Losada;Francisco Martin

  • An energy balance snowmelt model in a Mediterranean site

    J. Herrero;M.J. Polo;A. Moñino;M.A. Losada

  • Tide transformation in the Guadalquivir estuary (SW Spain) and process-based zonation

    Manuel Díez-Minguito;A. Baquerizo;M. Ortega-Sánchez;Gabriel Navarro

  • Dependence of coefficient K on grain size

    Ricardo del Valle;Raúl Medina;Miguel A. Losada

  • Experimental study of wave-induced flow in a porous structure

    I.J. Losada;M.A. Losada;F.L. Martín

  • Temporal and spatial relationship between sediment grain size and beach profile

    R Medina;M.A Losada;I.J Losada;C Vidal

  • The joint effect of the wave height and period on the stability of rubble mound breakwaters using Iribarren's number

    Miguel A. Losada;Luis A. Gimenez-Curto

  • An analytical method to evaluate the efficiency of porous screens as wave dampers

    Iñigo J. Losada;Miguel A. Losada;Asunción Baquerizo

  • A unified statistical model for hydrological variables including the selection of threshold for the peak over threshold method

    S. Solari;S. Solari;M. A. Losada

  • Wave loads on rubble mound breakwater crown walls

    Francisco L Martin;Miguel A Losada;Raul Medina

  • Interaction of non-breaking directional random waves with submerged breakwaters

    I.J. Losada;R. Silva;M.A. Losada

  • Peaks Over Threshold (POT): A methodology for automatic threshold estimation using goodness of fit p-value

    Sebastián Solari;Marta Egüen;María José Polo;Miguel A. Losada

  • Experimental study of the evolution of a solitary wave at an abrupt junction

    M. A. Losada;C. Vidal;R. Medina

  • Implications of delta retreat on wave propagation and longshore sediment transport - Guadalfeo case study (southern Spain)

    Rafael J. Bergillos;Alejandro López-Ruiz;Miguel Ortega-Sánchez;Gerd Masselink

  • Impact of river regulation on a Mediterranean delta: Assessment of managed versus unmanaged scenarios

    Rafael J. Bergillos;Cristóbal Rodríguez-Delgado;Agustín Millares;Miguel Ortega-Sánchez

Frequent Co-Authors

S. Falciano
S. Falciano National Institute for Nuclear Physics
William Trischuk
William Trischuk University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals find that combining environmental knowledge with other fields such as social work can enhance their impact. For example, accredited online dsw programs in social work provide advanced skills for addressing community and environmental challenges.

If flexibility and affordability are priorities, students might consider a low cost online general studies degree. This option offers a broad educational foundation, which can be tailored with electives relevant to environmental topics, preparing graduates for versatile roles.

Those new to higher education or looking for a less demanding pathway should explore options listed under easiest bachelors degree. While "easy" is relative, these programs typically offer flexible pacing and manageable coursework, supporting students balancing other commitments.

Specifically tied to the environmental field, an online geoscience degree provides specialized training in earth sciences, making graduates well-equipped for careers in conservation, natural resource management, and environmental consulting.

Best Scientists Citing Miguel A. Losada

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles