World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
53
Citations
9306
World Ranking
3456
National Ranking
1015

James A. Zagzebski publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Zagzebski sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 134 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 117 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 59 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 236 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

James A. Zagzebski D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Zagzebski sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 128 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 349 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 425 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 94 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 24 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

James A. Zagzebski is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions in radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, radiation, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and critical care and intensive care medicine.

Their recent research output includes a variety of publications spanning imaging techniques and applications. Notable papers include:

  • Three-dimensional US for Quantification of Volumetric Blood Flow: Multisite Multisystem Results from within the Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance, 2020, Radiology
  • First-in-human imaging using a MR-compatible e4D ultrasound probe for motion management of radiotherapy, 2021, Physica Medica
  • Effects of ultrasound technology advances on measurement of carotid intima-media thickness: A review, 2020, Vascular Medicine
  • Optimization of Ultrasound Backscatter Spectroscopy to Assess Neurotoxic Effects of Anesthesia in the Newborn Non-human Primate Brain, 2020, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
  • Issue Information, 2020, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Zagzebski has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Michelle L. Robbin, J. Brian Fowlkes, Samer Narouze, Stamatia Destounis, and Richard Hoppmann. Many of these collaborations have resulted in multiple co-authored works.

Their publications have appeared repeatedly in specific scholarly venues, especially:

  • Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
  • Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
  • Radiology
  • Physica Medica
  • Vascular Medicine

The main topics featured in Zagzebski's research involve:

  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry

Best Publications

  • Backscatter Coefficient Measurements Using a Reference Phantom to Extract Depth-Dependent Instrumentation Factors:

    Lin Xin Yao;James A. Zagzebski;Ernest L. Madsen

  • Tissue mimicking materials for ultrasound phantoms

    Ernest L. Madsen;James A. Zagzebski;Richard A. Banjavie;Ronald E. Jutila

  • Fundamentals and Applications of Ultrasonic Waves

    Unknown

  • A new ultrasound tissue-equivalent material.

    M M Burlew;E L Madsen;J A Zagzebski;R A Banjavic

  • Accuracy of Liver Fat Quantification With Advanced CT, MRI, and Ultrasound Techniques: Prospective Comparison With MR Spectroscopy.

    Harald Kramer;Perry J. Pickhardt;Mark A. Kliewer;Diego Hernando

  • Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter, attenuation, and speed measurements.

    E. L. Madsen;Fang Dong;G. R. Frank;B. S. Garra

  • Ultrasonic shear wave properties of soft tissues and tissuelike materials

    Ernest L. Madsen;H. John Sathoff;James A. Zagzebski

  • ELASTOGRAPHIC IMAGING OF THERMAL LESIONS IN THE LIVER IN VIVO FOLLOWING RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

    T Varghese;J.A Zagzebski;F.T Lee

  • Ultrasound backscatter and attenuation in human liver with diffuse disease.

    Zheng Feng Lu;J.A. Zagzebski;F.T. Lee

  • Method of data reduction for accurate determination of acoustic backscatter coefficients

    Ernest L. Madsen;Michael F. Insana;James A. Zagzebski

  • Ultrasound transmission measurements through the os calcis.

    James A. Zagzebski;Phillip J. Rossman;Carmen Mesina;Richard B. Mazess

  • Oil-in-gelatin dispersions for use as ultrasonically tissue-mimicking materials.

    Ernest L. Madsen;James A. Zagzebski;Gary R. Frank

  • Ultrasound monitoring of temperature change during radiofrequency ablation: preliminary in-vivo results

    T Varghese;J.A Zagzebski;Q Chen;U Techavipoo

  • Temperature dependence of ultrasonic propagation speed and attenuation in excised canine liver tissue measured using transmitted and reflected pulses.

    U. Techavipoo;T. Varghese;Q. Chen;T. A. Stiles

  • Elastographic imaging of soft tissue in vivo

    Tomy Varghese;James A. Zagzebski;Udomchai Techavipoo;Quan Chen

  • Estimation of displacement vectors and strain tensors in elastography using angular insonifications

    U. Techavipoo;Q. Chen;T. Varghese;J.A. Zagzebski

  • Quantitative Assessment of In Vivo Breast Masses Using Ultrasound Attenuation and Backscatter

    Kibo Nam;James A. Zagzebski;Timothy J. Hall

  • Elastographic measurement of the area and volume of thermal lesions resulting from radiofrequency ablation: pathologic correlation.

    Tomy Varghese;Udomchai Techavipoo;Wu Liu;James A. Zagzebski

  • A frequency domain model for generating B-mode images with array transducers

    Yadong Li;J.A. Zagzebski

  • Nonlinearity parameter for tissue-mimicking materials.

    Fang Dong;Ernest L Madsen;Michael C MacDonald;James A Zagzebski

  • Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging: In Vivo Results in Normal Liver

    J.A. Zagzebski;Z.F. Lu;L.X. Yao

  • Spectral and color Doppler artifacts.

    M A Pozniak;J A Zagzebski;K A Scanlan

  • Tests of backscatter coefficient measurement using broadband pulses

    J.-F. Chen;J.A. Zagzebski;E.L. Madsen

  • Improvements in the spectral difference method for measuring ultrasonic attenuation

    Michael Insana;James Zagzebski;Ernest Madsen

  • Attenuation and Backscatter Estimation Using Video Signal Analysis Applied to B-Mode Images

    B. S. Knipp;J. A. Zagzebski;Thaddeus Wilson;F. Dong

  • Ultrasonic Imaging of Myocardial Strain Using Cardiac Elastography

    Tomy Varghese;J.A. Zagzebski;P. Rahko;C.S. Breburda

  • Continuous waves generated by focused radiators

    Ernest L. Madsen;Mitchell M. Goodsitt;James A. Zagzebski

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernest L. Madsen
Ernest L. Madsen University of Wisconsin–Madison
Tomy Varghese
Tomy Varghese University of Wisconsin–Madison
Timothy J. Hall
Timothy J. Hall University of Wisconsin–Madison
William D. O'Brien
William D. O'Brien University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michael L. Oelze
Michael L. Oelze University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michael F. Insana
Michael F. Insana University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Paul L. Carson
Paul L. Carson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Chrysanthy Ikonomidou
Chrysanthy Ikonomidou University of Wisconsin–Madison
Charles A. Mistretta
Charles A. Mistretta University of Wisconsin–Madison
Guang-Hong Chen
Guang-Hong Chen University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and Technology graduates in the USA often discover diverse career trajectories beyond their field. Expanding your expertise with related disciplines can enhance job prospects and open doors to leadership roles.

For those interested in business leadership within STEM industries, pursuing one of the cheapest AACSB online MBA programs is a strategic choice. These accredited degrees offer the management and financial knowledge essential for advancing into executive or project management roles.

Some technologists may seek to apply their logical and analytical skills in law. Completing ABA approved online paralegal programs can prepare you for positions that integrate technology with legal research, intellectual property, or compliance.

Human resources and internal communications are critical to any organization’s success. An online master’s degree in human resource management or a masters in communication online can empower engineering professionals to guide teams or manage company-wide change.

Exploring these affordable online degree options can help you build a well-rounded skillset, ensuring flexibility and advancement in an evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing James A. Zagzebski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles