World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
37
Citations
8421
World Ranking
6144
National Ranking
2941

George M. Bodner publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George M. Bodner sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 148 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

George M. Bodner D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George M. Bodner sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

George M. Bodner is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their research spans multiple intersecting fields within the social sciences and psychology, with a focus on education and developmental and educational psychology.

The main fields of study associated with George M. Bodner include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Within these broader disciplines, their work further delves into subfields such as:

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Literature and Literary Theory

The primary research topics explored by Bodner cover areas related to teaching, learning, and assessment in educational contexts. Key topics include:

  • Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Various Chemistry Research Topics
  • Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Reflective Practices in Education
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments

Their recent published papers are as follows:

  • "A Review of Biochemistry Education Research," 2020, Journal of Chemical Education
  • "The impact of inquiry-based, group-work approaches to instruction on both students and their peer leaders," 2020, European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
  • "The Role of Question-Asking in Mentoring Undergraduate Research," 2023, Journal of College Science Teaching

Frequent co-authors collaborating with George M. Bodner include:

  • Franziska K. Lang
  • Rıdvan Elmas
  • Sara Johnson

Their research has been disseminated through several publication venues, including:

  • Journal of Chemical Education
  • European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
  • Journal of College Science Teaching

Best Publications

  • Constructivism: A theory of knowledge

    George M. Bodner

  • The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints

    Nancy Brickhouse;George M. Bodner

  • The Purdue Visualization of Rotations Test

    George M. Bodner;Roland B. Guay

  • Factors Influencing the Self-Efficacy Beliefs of First-Year Engineering Students

    Mica A. Hutchison;Deborah K. Follman;Melissa Sumpter;George M. Bodner

  • "It Gets Me to the Product": How Students Propose Organic Mechanisms

    Gautam Bhattacharyya;George M. Bodner

  • What Does it Mean to Design? A Qualitative Investigation of Design Professionals' Experiences

    Shanna R. Daly;Robin S. Adams;George M. Bodner

  • The Many Forms of Constructivism

    George M. Bodner;Michael Klobuchar;David Geelan

  • Spatial Ability and its Role in Organic Chemistry: A Study of Four Organic Courses.

    Jeffrey R. Pribyl;George M. Bodner

  • WHAT RESEARCH TELLS US ABOUT USING ANALOGIES TO TEACH CHEMISTRY

    MaryKay Orgill;George Bodner

  • A Fourier transform carbon-13 NMR study of the electronic effects of phosphorus, arsenic, and antimony ligands in transition-metal carbonyl complexes

    George M. Bodner;Melanie P. May;Laurie E. McKinney

  • A study of two measures of spatial ability as predictors of success in different levels of general chemistry

    Carolyn S. Carter;Mary A. Larussa;George M. Bodner

  • I HAVE FOUND YOU AN ARGUMENT: THE CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF BEGINNING CHEMISTRY GRADUATE STUDENTS

    George M. Bodner

  • Making sense of the arrow-pushing formalism among chemistry majors enrolled in organic chemistry

    Robert Ferguson;George M. Bodner

  • Mental Models: The Role of Representations in Problem Solving in Chemistry

    George M. Bodner;Daniel S. Domin

  • COGNITIVE RESTRUCTURING AS AN EARLY STAGE IN PROBLEM SOLVING

    George M. Bodner;Theresa L. B. McMillen

  • Contextual epistemic development in science: A comparison of chemistry students and research chemists

    Ala Samarapungavan;Erik L. Westby;George M. Bodner

  • Providing a Voice: Qualitative Investigation of the Impact of a First-Year Engineering Experience on Students' Efficacy Beliefs

    Mica A. Hutchison-Green;Deborah K. Follman;George M. Bodner

  • Sixth-Grade Students’ Views of the Nature of Engineering and Images of Engineers

    Faik O. Karatas;Amy Micklos;George M. Bodner

  • Theoretical Frameworks for Research in Chemistry/Science Education

    George M. Bodner;MaryKay Orgill

  • What can we do about ‘Parker’? A case study of a good student who didn't ‘get’ organic chemistry

    Trisha L. Anderson;George M. Bodner

  • PROBLEM-SOLVING IN CHEMISTRY

    George M. Bodner;J. Dudley Herron

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph Krajcik
Joseph Krajcik Michigan State University
Mark C. Hersam
Mark C. Hersam Northwestern University
Thomas O. Mason
Thomas O. Mason Northwestern University
Sandra K. Abell
Sandra K. Abell Purdue University West Lafayette
Marvin D. Rausch
Marvin D. Rausch University of Massachusetts Amherst

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Social Sciences and Humanities often starts with selecting the right degree. Today, students increasingly turn to online programs for greater flexibility and affordability. Many prospective social workers are interested in the cheapest online msw programs, which enable students to earn a master’s degree in social work without taking on significant debt. These options make graduate education accessible to a wider group of learners.

For those seeking to specialize quickly, the masters in social work online and accelerated bcba program online provide faster pathways to licensure and advanced roles in settings like schools, clinics, and community organizations. Such accelerated degrees allow working professionals to advance their careers efficiently.

If psychology is your calling, choose the fastest online psychology degree to launch your career in counseling, research, or applied psychology. Each of these online degrees is designed to fit your schedule, support your professional goals, and prepare you for in-demand roles in today’s diverse and dynamic fields.

Best Scientists Citing George M. Bodner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles