World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
8684
World Ranking
9603
National Ranking
19

Radim Belohlavek publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Radim Belohlavek sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 254 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Radim Belohlavek D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Radim Belohlavek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Radim Belohlavek is affiliated with Palacký University, Olomouc in the Czech Republic. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work spans a variety of topics, most notably:

  • Advanced Algebra and Logic
  • Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems
  • Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Categorization, perception, and language

Radim Belohlavek has published extensively in several academic venues. Among the frequent publication outlets are:

  • International Journal of General Systems
  • IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
  • International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
  • Fuzzy Sets and Systems
  • Information Sciences

The most recent papers include:

  • "Typicality: A formal concept analysis account" (2021), published in International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
  • "Basic level of concepts in formal concept analysis 1: formalization and utilization" (2020), published in International Journal of General Systems
  • "Factorization of Matrices With Grades With Overcovering" (2023), published in IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
  • "On the concept of fuzzy order I: Remarks and observations" (2023), published in International Journal of General Systems
  • "Basic level of concepts and formal concept analysis 2: examination of existing basic level metrics" (2020), published in International Journal of General Systems

The scientist collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Martin Trnečka
  • Tomas Mikula
  • Eduard Bartl
  • Markéta Trnečková
  • Tomas Urbanec

Best Publications

  • Fuzzy Relational Systems: Foundations and Principles

    Radim Belohlavek

  • Fuzzy Relational Systems: Foundations and Principles

    Unknown

  • Concept lattices and order in fuzzy logic

    Unknown

  • Fuzzy Galois Connections

    Radim Bêlohlávek;Radim Bêlohlávek

  • Discovery of optimal factors in binary data via a novel method of matrix decomposition

    Radim Belohlavek;Vilem Vychodil

  • Fuzzy Logic and Mathematics: A Historical Perspective

    Radim Belohlavek;George J. Klir;Joseph W. Dauben

  • What is a fuzzy concept lattice? II

    Radim Belohlavek

  • Fuzzy Closure Operators

    R Belohlavek

  • Fuzzy Logic and Mathematics

    Unknown

  • Similarity relations in concept lattices

    Radim Belohlávek

  • Fuzzy Equational Logic

    Radim Belohlávek;Vilém Vychodil

  • What is a fuzzy concept lattice

    Radim Belohlávek;Vilém Vychodil

  • Concepts and Fuzzy Logic

    Radim Belohlavek;George J. Klir

  • Reducing the Size of Fuzzy Concept Lattices by Hedges

    R. Belohlavek;V. Vychodil

  • Lattices of Fixed Points of Fuzzy Galois Connections

    Unknown

  • Crisply Generated Fuzzy Concepts

    Unknown

  • Determinism and fuzzy automata

    Unknown

  • Computing the Lattice of All Fixpoints of a Fuzzy Closure Operator

    Radim Belohlavek;Bernard De Baets;Jan Outrata;Vilem Vychodil

  • Formal Concept Analysis With Background Knowledge: Attribute Priorities

    R. Belohlavek;V. Vychodil

  • Attribute Implications in a Fuzzy Setting

    Unknown

  • Formal concept analysis and linguistic hedges

    Radim Belohlavek;Vilem Vychodil

  • Sup-t-norm and inf-residuum are one type of relational product: Unifying framework and consequences

    Radim Belohlavek

  • Data tables with similarity relations : Functional dependencies, complete rules and non-redundant bases

    Radim Belohlavek;Vilém Vychodil

  • From-below approximations in Boolean matrix factorization: Geometry and new algorithm

    Radim Belohlavek;Martin Trnecka

  • Fast factorization by similarity in formal concept analysis of data with fuzzy attributes

    Radim Belohlavek;Jiří Dvořák;Jan Outrata

  • Optimal decompositions of matrices with entries from residuated lattices

    Radim Belohlavek

  • FUZZY INTERIOR OPERATORS

    Radim Belohlávek;Tatána Funioková

Frequent Co-Authors

George J. Klir
George J. Klir Binghamton University
Bernard De Baets
Bernard De Baets Ghent University
Sergei O. Kuznetsov
Sergei O. Kuznetsov National Research University Higher School of Economics
Rudolf Kruse
Rudolf Kruse Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Vilém Novák
Vilém Novák University of Ostrava

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens up a diverse range of online degree and career pathways. Many students consider starting with associates degrees online for a fast and budget-friendly introduction to the tech field. These programs are flexible, helping students build foundational skills for entry-level jobs or further study.

For those seeking a quicker return on investment, some short certificate programs that pay well can jumpstart your tech career. These credentials focus on in-demand skills such as coding, networking, or cybersecurity, and can be completed in less than a year.

If you’re considering advancing your education further, it’s worth looking at the shortest masters degree programs online. Accelerated master’s degrees let you boost your credentials in as little as one year while balancing work and study.

Unsure which graduate program fits your goals? Check out advice on what masters program should i do for insight on the most useful and valuable degrees currently in demand by employers. The right pathway can help you achieve your career goals in the growing field of computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Radim Belohlavek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles