World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Molecular Biology
Spain
2026
Award Badge
Genetics and Molecular Biology
Spain
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 105 447 406 5 5 307 39254

Thomas Graf publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Graf between 1969 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Graf published across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2022. 10 of the 358 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2022. 1969: 2 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 4 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 5 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 8 publications 1979: 9 publications 1980: 8 publications 1981: 8 publications 1982: 11 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 12 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 7 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications
1969 2025

358 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Graf: publications per year, 1969 to 2025
Year Publications
1969 2
1970 2
1971 2
1972 4
1973 3
1974 1
1975 1
1976 5
1977 4
1978 8
1979 9
1980 8
1981 8
1982 11
1983 8
1984 7
1985 8
1986 9
1987 12
1988 9
1989 7
1990 5
1991 6
1992 12
1993 3
1994 3
1995 10
1996 6
1997 5
1998 6
1999 2
2000 7
2001 1
2002 7
2003 8
2004 12
2005 4
2006 7
2007 9
2008 5
2009 4
2010 4
2011 4
2012 6
2013 6
2014 9
2015 5
2016 7
2017 9
2018 6
2019 6
2020 7
2021 6
2022 15
2023 8
2024 6
2025 4
Total 358
Download as CSV

Thomas Graf publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Graf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 307–316 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 307 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46 307
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Graf D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Graf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33 105
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Molecular Biology in Spain Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Molecular Biology in Spain Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Spain Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Molecular Biology in Spain Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Spain Leader Award
  • 1991 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 1989 - Paul Ehrlich and Ludwig Darmstaedter Prize

Overview

Thomas Graf is affiliated with the Centre for Genomic Regulation in Spain. Their work spans several domains within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions to the fields of molecular biology, artificial intelligence, computational theory and mathematics, immunology, and genetics.

Their research topics include:

  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Semigroups and Automata Theory
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • RNA Modifications and Cancer

Recent publications by Thomas Graf include:

  • "CTCF is dispensable for immune cell transdifferentiation but facilitates an acute inflammatory response," 2020, Nature Genetics
  • "Evidence for additive and synergistic action of mammalian enhancers during cell fate determination," 2021, eLife
  • "Transcriptional activation during cell reprogramming correlates with the formation of 3D open chromatin hubs," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "CTCF chromatin residence time controls three-dimensional genome organization, gene expression and DNA methylation in pluripotent cells," 2021, Nature Cell Biology
  • "Cnidarian-bilaterian comparison reveals the ancestral regulatory logic of the β-catenin dependent axial patterning," 2021, Nature Communications

Thomas Graf has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Grégoire Stik
  • Luísa de Andrés-Aguayo
  • Tian V. Tian
  • Antonios Klonizakis
  • Maria Vila-Casadesús

The main venues in which they have published multiple times include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife
  • Nature Communications
  • Nature Cell Biology
  • The EMBO Journal

Thomas Graf's publication record shows a focus on molecular mechanisms underlying gene regulation, chromatin dynamics, and transcriptional control, often integrating computational and theoretical approaches. Their work also extends to studies on immune cell behavior, enhancer dynamics during cell fate determination, and comparative developmental biology.

They have received recognition in the scientific community, including membership in the Academia Europaea since 1991 and the Paul Ehrlich and Ludwig Darmstaedter Prize awarded in 1989.

Best Publications

  • A paracrine loop between tumor cells and macrophages is required for tumor cell migration in mammary tumors.

    Jeffrey Wyckoff;Weigang Wang;Elaine Y. Lin;Yarong Wang

  • Stepwise Reprogramming of B Cells into Macrophages

    Huafeng Xie;Min Ye;Ru Feng;Thomas Graf

  • Forcing cells to change lineages

    Thomas Graf;Tariq Enver

  • Chicken hematopoietic cells transformed by seven strains of defective avian leukemia viruses display three distinct phenotypes of differentiation.

    Hartmut Beug;Alexandra von Kirchbach;Gabriele Döderlein;Jean-Francois Conscience

  • Dynamic Visualization of Thrombopoiesis Within Bone Marrow

    Tobias Junt;Harald Schulze;Zhao Chen;Steffen Massberg

  • Human Monocytes Engage an Alternative Inflammasome Pathway

    Moritz M. Gaidt;Thomas S. Ebert;Dhruv Chauhan;Tobias Schmidt

  • Insertion of enhanced green fluorescent protein into the lysozyme gene creates mice with green fluorescent granulocytes and macrophages

    Nicole Faust;Florencio Varas;Louise M. Kelly;Susanne Heck

  • Avian leukemia viruses: interaction with their target cells in vivo and in vitro.

    Thomas Graf;Hartmut Beug

  • The v-myb oncogene product binds to and activates the promyelocyte-specific mim-1 gene

    Scott A. Ness;Åsa Marknell;Thomas Graf

  • Myeloid or Lymphoid Promiscuity as a Critical Step in Hematopoietic Lineage Commitment

    Toshihiro Miyamoto;Hiromi Iwasaki;Boris Reizis;Min Ye

  • GATA-1 reprograms avian myelomonocytic cell lines into eosinophils, thromboblasts, and erythroblasts.

    H Kulessa;J Frampton;T Graf

  • PU.1 induces myeloid lineage commitment in multipotent hematopoietic progenitors

    Claus Nerlov;Thomas Graf

  • Systemic Human ILC Precursors Provide a Substrate for Tissue ILC Differentiation.

    Ai Ing Lim;Ai Ing Lim;Ai Ing Lim;Yan Li;Yan Li;Silvia Lopez-Lastra;Silvia Lopez-Lastra;Silvia Lopez-Lastra;Ralph Stadhouders

  • Three new types of viral oncogene of cellular origin specific for haematopoietic cell transformation

    M Roussel;S Saule;C Lagrou;C Rommens

  • Differentiation plasticity of hematopoietic cells.

    Thomas Graf

  • Platelets regulate lymphatic vascular development through CLEC-2–SLP-76 signaling

    Cara C. Bertozzi;Alec A. Schmaier;Patricia Mericko;Paul R. Hess

  • PU.1 and C/EBPα/β convert fibroblasts into macrophage-like cells

    Ru Feng;Sabrina C. Desbordes;Huafeng Xie;Ester Sanchez Tillo

  • GATA-1 interacts with the myeloid PU.1 transcription factor and represses PU.1-dependent transcription.

    Claus Nerlov;Erich Querfurth;Erich Querfurth;Holger Kulessa;Holger Kulessa;Thomas Graf;Thomas Graf

  • Transcription factors and 3D genome conformation in cell-fate decisions

    Ralph Stadhouders;Guillaume J. Filion;Thomas Graf

  • Reprogramming of Committed T Cell Progenitors to Macrophages and Dendritic Cells by C/EBPα and PU.1 Transcription Factors

    Catherine V. Laiosa;Matthias Stadtfeld;Huafeng Xie;Luisa de Andres-Aguayo

Frequent Co-Authors

Hartmut Beug
Hartmut Beug Research Institute of Molecular Pathology
Kelly M. McNagny
Kelly M. McNagny University of British Columbia
Achim Leutz
Achim Leutz Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine
Dominique Stehelin
Dominique Stehelin Institut Pasteur
Jon Frampton
Jon Frampton University of Birmingham
Marc A. Marti-Renom
Marc A. Marti-Renom Pompeu Fabra University
Koichi Akashi
Koichi Akashi Kyushu University
Miguel Beato
Miguel Beato Centre for Genomic Regulation
Denis Thieffry
Denis Thieffry École Normale Supérieure

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in molecular biology, numerous online degrees and career pathways can complement or expand your expertise. For students with a background in molecular biology looking toward health and communication fields, an slp bridge program lets non-SLP majors transition into speech-language pathology through online study, opening new clinical and research opportunities.

Those considering a rapid move into nursing can explore online accelerated nursing programs for non nurses. These programs are designed for bachelor’s degree holders from different fields and can lead to a Bachelor of Science in Nursing in a shorter time frame.

For advanced practice, becoming a nurse practitioner (NP) is a popular goal. Many wonder how many years does it take to be a nurse practitioner. Several accelerated pathways now allow students to qualify in as little as two years, depending on previous experience and study intensity.

Career prospects are excellent, especially in specialized roles. For example, those who advance to a Doctor of Nursing Practice – Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (DNP PMHNP) can expect strong employment prospects and competitive dnp pmhnp salary rates nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Graf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles