World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Angelo Gatta

Angelo Gatta

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
20450
World Ranking
16303
National Ranking
645

Angelo Gatta publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelo Gatta sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 502 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Angelo Gatta D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelo Gatta sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Angelo Gatta is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy. Their primary field of study is Engineering, with a specialization in Control and Systems Engineering. The main research topics covered in their work include Optimization and Mathematical Programming.

Their recent publication is titled "Goal Programming Model for Resources Allocation and Production Planning of Adama Beverages", published in 2025 in the International Journal of Development Mathematics (IJDM).

  • Goal Programming Model for Resources Allocation and Production Planning of Adama Beverages, 2025, International Journal of Development Mathematics (IJDM)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Angelo Gatta include:

  • O. Afolabi
  • Bello Y. Hammanyero
  • Ahmed Umar

The venues where Angelo Gatta has published their work are as follows:

  • International Journal of Development Mathematics (IJDM)

Best Publications

  • Nutrition and survival in patients with liver cirrhosis.

    Franca Alberino;Angelo Gatta;Piero Amodio;Carlo Merkel

  • Reversal of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome with the administration of midodrine and octreotide.

    Paolo Angeli;Roberta Volpin;Giorgio Gerunda;Raffaella Craighero

  • Renal failure and bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis: epidemiology and clinical features.

    Silvano Fasolato;Paolo Angeli;Lucia Dallagnese;Giulio Maresio

  • Hypoalbuminemia

    Angelo Gatta;Alberto Verardo;Massimo Bolognesi

  • Natural history of portal hypertensive gastropathy in patients with liver cirrhosis

    Massimo Primignani;Luca Carpinelli;Paoletta Preatoni;Giorgio Battaglia

  • Limitations of Serum Creatinine Level and Creatinine Clearance as Filtration Markers in Cirrhosis

    Lorenza Caregaro;Francesca Menon;Paolo Angeli;Piero Amodio

  • Characteristics of Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy

    Piero Amodio;Sara Montagnese;Angelo Gatta;Marsha Y. Morgan

  • Malnutrition in alcoholic and virus-related cirrhosis.

    Lorenza Caregaro;Franca Alberino;Piero Amodio;Carlo Merkel

  • Terlipressin plus albumin versus midodrine and octreotide plus albumin in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: A randomized trial.

    Marta Cavallin;Patrick S. Kamath;Manuela Merli;Silvano Fasolato

  • The hemodynamic response to medical treatment of portal hypertension as a predictor of clinical effectiveness in the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis.

    Carlo Merkel;Massimo Bolognesi;David Sacerdoti;Giancarlo Bombonato

  • Role of spleen enlargement in cirrhosis with portal hypertension.

    M. Bolognesi;C. Merkel;D. Sacerdoti;V. Nava

  • Clinical features and survivial of cirrhotic patients with subclinical cognitive alterations detected by the number connection test and computerized psychometric tests

    Piero Amodio;Franco Del Piccolo;Piergiorgio Marchetti;Paolo Angeli

  • A placebo-controlled clinical trial of nadolol in the prophylaxis of growth of small esophageal varices in cirrhosis

    Carlo Merkel;Renato Marin;Paolo Angeli;Pierluigi Zanella

  • Prevalence and prognostic value of quantified electroencephalogram (EEG) alterations in cirrhotic patients

    Piero Amodio;Franco Del Piccolo;Elena Pettenò;Daniela Mapelli

  • Evaluation of the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and ascites

    Salvatore Piano;Silvia Rosi;Giulio Maresio;Silvano Fasolato

  • Detection of minimal hepatic encephalopathy: Normalization and optimization of the Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score. A neuropsychological and quantified EEG study

    Piero Amodio;Francesca Campagna;Stefania Olianas;Pamela Iannizzi

  • Chronic hepatitis B in children after e antigen seroclearance: final report of a 29-year longitudinal study.

    Flavia Bortolotti;Maria Guido;Samuela Bartolacci;Paolo Cadrobbi

  • Prognostic usefulness of hepatic vein catheterization in patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices

    Carlo Merkel;Massimo Bolognesi;Stefano Bellon;Renzo Zuin

  • Splanchnic vasodilation and hyperdynamic circulatory syndrome in cirrhosis.

    Massimo Bolognesi;Marco Di Pascoli;Alberto Verardo;Angelo Gatta

  • Prevalence of Liver Disease in a Population of Asymptomatic Persons with Hepatitis C Virus Infection

    Alfredo Alberti;Franco Noventa;Luisa Benvegnù;Silvia Boccato

Frequent Co-Authors

Paolo Angeli
Paolo Angeli University of Padua
Daniela Mapelli
Daniela Mapelli University of Padua
Steven J. Schiff
Steven J. Schiff Yale University
Mario Plebani
Mario Plebani University of Padua
Alfredo Alberti
Alfredo Alberti University of Padua
Livio Trentin
Livio Trentin University of Padua
Flavia Bortolotti
Flavia Bortolotti University of Padua
Maria Marino
Maria Marino Roma Tre University
Mauro Bernardi
Mauro Bernardi University of Bologna
Carlo Umiltà
Carlo Umiltà University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA can open doors to a wide range of healthcare careers. However, not everyone chooses the traditional doctor route. Many students opt for alternative pathways through online degrees, which can be more affordable and flexible.

For example, if you are interested in managing patient records and health data, a bachelor of health information management online provides the necessary skills for this growing field. Similarly, those seeking to enter the administrative side of healthcare may consider a medical billing and coding online course to swiftly gain marketable expertise.

Nursing remains one of the most in-demand careers. Becoming a nurse practitioner is both rewarding and flexible, especially with choices like the cheapest online fnp program. Registered nurses looking to advance can also benefit from an affordable cheapest rn to bsn online program to boost their credentials and earning potential.

These online pathways offer accessible, diverse opportunities for those passionate about healthcare without the lengthy commitment of traditional medical schools.

Best Scientists Citing Angelo Gatta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles