World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
7929
World Ranking
10559
National Ranking
4425

Stephen J. Fink publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Fink sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 84 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stephen J. Fink D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Fink sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - ACM Distinguished Member
  • 2008 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Stephen J. Fink is affiliated with IBM in the United States. Their recent scholarly contributions include work focused on virtual classroom environments.

One notable paper authored by Stephen J. Fink is titled Physical to Virtual: A Model for Future Virtual Classroom Environments, published in 2021 in Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst). This publication has garnered citations and contributes to discussions surrounding educational technology and virtual learning spaces.

The primary venue for their published work is:

  • Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)

Stephen J. Fink's awards include recognition by the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). They were named ACM Senior Member in 2008 and later honored as an ACM Distinguished Member in 2011.

Their research interests encompass areas related to virtual environments for education, though specific subfields or main topics have not been explicitly listed.

Best Publications

  • The Jalapeño virtual machine

    B. Alpern;C. R. Attanasio;J. J. Barton;M. G. Burke

  • Serverless Computing: Current Trends and Open Problems

    Ioana Baldini;Paul C. Castro;Kerry Shih-Ping Chang;Perry Cheng

  • Adaptive optimization in the Jalapeno JVM

    Matthew Arnold;Stephen Fink;David Grove;Michael Hind

  • TAJ: effective taint analysis of web applications

    Omer Tripp;Marco Pistoia;Stephen J. Fink;Manu Sridharan

  • The Jalapeño dynamic optimizing compiler for Java

    Michael G. Burke;Jong-Deok Choi;Stephen Fink;David Grove

  • Effective typestate verification in the presence of aliasing

    Stephen J. Fink;Eran Yahav;Nurit Dor;G. Ramalingam

  • The Jikes research virtual machine project: building an open-source research community

    B. Alpern;S. Augart;S. M. Blackburn;M. Butrico

  • Thin slicing

    Manu Sridharan;Stephen J. Fink;Rastislav Bodik

  • A Survey of Adaptive Optimization in Virtual Machines

    M. Arnold;S.J. Fink;D. Grove;M. Hind

  • Static Specification Mining Using Automata-Based Abstractions

    S. Shoham;E. Yahav;S.J. Fink;M. Pistoia

  • Design, implementation and evaluation of adaptive recompilation with on-stack replacement

    Stephen J. Fink;Feng Qian

  • Static specification mining using automata-based abstractions

    Sharon Shoham;Eran Yahav;Stephen Fink;Marco Pistoia

  • Effective typestate verification in the presence of aliasing

    Stephen Fink;Eran Yahav;Nurit Dor;G. Ramalingam

  • Snugglebug: a powerful approach to weakest preconditions

    Satish Chandra;Stephen J. Fink;Manu Sridharan

  • Method for characterizing program execution by periodic call stack inspection

    Matthew R. Arnold;Stephen J. Fink;David P. Grove;Michael J. Hind

  • Compiling a high-level language for GPUs: (via language support for architectures and compilers)

    Christophe Dubach;Perry Cheng;Rodric Rabbah;David F. Bacon

  • A comparative study of static and profile-based heuristics for inlining

    Matthew Arnold;Stephen Fink;Vivek Sarkar;Peter F. Sweeney

  • The serverless trilemma: function composition for serverless computing

    Ioana Baldini;Perry Cheng;Stephen J. Fink;Nick Mitchell

  • Alias analysis for object-oriented programs

    Manu Sridharan;Satish Chandra;Julian Dolby;Stephen J. Fink

  • Efficient implementation of Java interfaces: Invokeinterface considered harmless

    Bowen Alpern;Anthony Cocchi;Stephen Fink;David Grove

  • Adaptive optimization in the Jalapeño JVM (poster session)

    Matthew Arnold;Stephen Fink;David Grove;Michael Hind

Frequent Co-Authors

David Grove
David Grove IBM (United States)
Perry Cheng
Perry Cheng IBM (United States)
Michael Hind
Michael Hind IBM (United States)
David F. Bacon
David F. Bacon Google (United States)
Eran Yahav
Eran Yahav Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Manu Sridharan
Manu Sridharan University of California, Riverside
Marco Pistoia
Marco Pistoia JPMorgan Chase & Co (United States)
Vivek Sarkar
Vivek Sarkar Georgia Institute of Technology
Julian Dolby
Julian Dolby IBM (United States)
Satish Chandra
Satish Chandra Association for Computing Machinery

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA can open doors to many related online degrees that complement or expand your career options. For those passionate about sustainability and environmental technology, an environmental engineering online degree offers a pathway to work on solutions for ecological challenges using computing skills.

If you are interested in the design and development of machines, robotics, or manufacturing systems, pursuing an online degree for mechanical engineering can expand your technical expertise while staying adaptable with remote learning.

For those drawn to research and the science behind computing and technology, an online physics degree helps build a strong analytical foundation. Physics graduates often excel in fields requiring high-level problem solving and computational modeling.

Finally, as data continues to drive innovation, completing the cheapest master in data science can make you highly employable across sectors like AI, business intelligence, and machine learning.

Each of these online pathways can complement a Computer Science background, offering interdisciplinary skills and greater flexibility for career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen J. Fink

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles