World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lieven Eeckhout

Lieven Eeckhout

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
12452
World Ranking
3855
National Ranking
42

Lieven Eeckhout publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lieven Eeckhout sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 371 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lieven Eeckhout D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lieven Eeckhout sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - IEEE Fellow For contributions in computer architecture performance analysis and modeling
  • 2016 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Lieven Eeckhout is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and has a research focus primarily within the field of computer science. Their work spans multiple subfields including hardware and architecture, computer networks and communications, electrical and electronic engineering, and information systems. The main research topics covered include parallel computing and optimization techniques, advanced data storage technologies, green IT and sustainability, interconnection networks and systems, personal information management and user behavior, distributed systems and fault tolerance, and cloud computing and resource management.

They have contributed extensively to scientific literature with notable papers such as:

  • "A First-Order Model to Assess Computer Architecture Sustainability," 2022, IEEE Computer Architecture Letters
  • "Kaya for Computer Architects: Toward Sustainable Computer Systems," 2022, IEEE Micro
  • "Photonic Network-on-Wafer for Multichiplet GPUs," 2023, IEEE Micro
  • "Reliability-aware Garbage Collection for Hybrid HBM-DRAM Memories," 2021, ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization
  • "Balancing Performance Against Cost and Sustainability in Multi-Chip-Module GPUs," 2023, IEEE Computer Architecture Letters

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • IEEE Micro
  • IEEE Computer Architecture Letters
  • ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Computer

Collaborations with other researchers have been consistent, with frequent co-authors including Ajeya Naithani, Mahmood Naderan-Tahan, Magnus Jahre, Shiqing Zhang, and Jaime Roelandts.

Recognition of their contributions is reflected in awards such as the IEEE Fellow honor received in 2018 for their work in computer architecture performance analysis and modeling, as well as being named an ACM Senior Member in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Sniper: exploring the level of abstraction for scalable and accurate parallel multi-core simulation

    Trevor E. Carlson;Wim Heirmant;Lieven Eeckhout

  • Statistically rigorous java performance evaluation

    Andy Georges;Dries Buytaert;Lieven Eeckhout

  • System-Level Performance Metrics for Multiprogram Workloads

    S. Eyerman;L. Eeckhout

  • Scheduling heterogeneous multi-cores through Performance Impact Estimation (PIE)

    Kenzo Van Craeynest;Aamer Jaleel;Lieven Eeckhout;Paolo Narvaez

  • An Evaluation of High-Level Mechanistic Core Models

    Trevor E. Carlson;Wim Heirman;Stijn Eyerman;Ibrahim Hur

  • S-L P M M W

    Stijn Eyerman;Lieven Eeckhout

  • Microarchitecture-Independent Workload Characterization

    K. Hoste;L. Eeckhout

  • A performance counter architecture for computing accurate CPI components

    Stijn Eyerman;Lieven Eeckhout;Tejas Karkhanis;James E. Smith

  • A mechanistic performance model for superscalar out-of-order processors

    Stijn Eyerman;Lieven Eeckhout;Tejas Karkhanis;James E. Smith

  • System-scenario-based design of dynamic embedded systems

    Stefan Valentin Gheorghita;Martin Palkovic;Juan Hamers;Arnout Vandecappelle

  • Measuring Program Similarity: Experiments with SPEC CPU Benchmark Suites

    Aashish Phansalkar;Ajay Joshi;L. Eeckhout;L.K. John

  • Cole: compiler optimization level exploration

    Kenneth Hoste;Lieven Eeckhout

  • Interval simulation: Raising the level of abstraction in architectural simulation

    Davy Genbrugge;Stijn Eyerman;Lieven Eeckhout

  • Performance prediction based on inherent program similarity

    Kenneth Hoste;Aashish Phansalkar;Lieven Eeckhout;Andy Georges

  • Modeling critical sections in Amdahl's law and its implications for multicore design

    Stijn Eyerman;Lieven Eeckhout

  • Measuring benchmark similarity using inherent program characteristics

    Ajay Joshi;Aashish Phansalkar;L. Eeckhout;L.K. John

  • Quantifying the Impact of Input Data Sets on Program Behavior and its Applications

    Lieven Eeckhout;Hans Vandierendonck;Koenraad De Bosschere

  • Control Flow Modeling in Statistical Simulation for Accurate and Efficient Processor Design Studies

    Lieven Eeckhout;Robert H. Bell;Bastiaan Stougie;Koen De Bosschere

  • Fine-grained DVFS using on-chip regulators

    Stijn Eyerman;Lieven Eeckhout

  • Statistical simulation: adding efficiency to the computer designer's toolbox

    L. Eeckhout;S. Nussbaum;J.E. Smith;K. De Bosschere

  • A performance counter architecture for computing accurate CPI components

    Stijn Eyerman;Lieven Eeckhout;Tejas Karkhanis;James E Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Koen De Bosschere
Koen De Bosschere Ghent University
Lizy K. John
Lizy K. John The University of Texas at Austin
Cheng-Zhong Xu
Cheng-Zhong Xu University of Macau
David J. Lilja
David J. Lilja University of Minnesota
Aamer Jaleel
Aamer Jaleel Nvidia (United States)
James E. Smith
James E. Smith University of Wisconsin–Madison
Kathryn S. McKinley
Kathryn S. McKinley Google (United States)
Olivier Temam
Olivier Temam DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Brad Calder
Brad Calder Google (United States)
Hai Jin
Hai Jin Huazhong University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA also opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career options. For those interested in a faster route, a fast track computer science degree offers an accelerated way to gain essential skills and enter the job market sooner.

Many students also pursue online degrees in specialized areas. For example, those passionate about sustainability can consider environmental engineering degrees online, which blend engineering principles with environmental stewardship.

If you're fascinated by design, robotics, or manufacturing, you might explore online mechanical engineering degrees. These programs deliver strong technical foundations for innovation-driven industries.

For analytical thinkers and future researchers, studying physics can open up diverse scientific careers. The cheapest online physics degree options make this pathway more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Lieven Eeckhout

Trending Scientists