World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
69
Citations
19049
World Ranking
1975
National Ranking
999

Brad Calder publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brad Calder sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 168 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Brad Calder D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brad Calder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brad Calder is affiliated with Google in the United States, contributing to the fields of Computer Science, particularly focusing on Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, and Artificial Intelligence.

Their research encompasses a range of topics including Cloud Data Security Solutions, Security and Verification in Computing, Digital and Cyber Forensics, Cloud Computing and Resource Management, IoT and Edge/Fog Computing, and Software System Performance and Reliability.

Brad Calder has published work in several venues, most notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Computing Surveys

Recent papers include:

  • Architectures for Protecting Cloud Data Planes, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Deployment Archetypes for Cloud Applications, 2022, ACM Computing Surveys

Frequent coauthors are:

  • Grant Dasher
  • Ines Envid
  • Anna Berenberg

Best Publications

  • Automatically characterizing large scale program behavior

    Timothy Sherwood;Erez Perelman;Greg Hamerly;Brad Calder

  • Erasure coding in windows azure storage

    Cheng Huang;Huseyin Simitci;Yikang Xu;Aaron Ogus

  • Windows Azure Storage: a highly available cloud storage service with strong consistency

    Brad Calder;Ju Wang;Aaron Ogus;Niranjan Nilakantan

  • Basic Block Distribution Analysis to Find Periodic Behavior and Simulation Points in Applications

    Timothy Sherwood;Erez Perelman;Brad Calder

  • Phase tracking and prediction

    Timothy Sherwood;Suleyman Sair;Brad Calder

  • Deterministic memory-efficient string matching algorithms for intrusion detection

    N. Tuck;T. Sherwood;B. Calder;G. Varghese

  • Entropia: architecture and performance of an enterprise desktop grid system

    Andrew Chien;Brad Calder;Stephen Elbert;Karan Bhatia

  • SimPoint 3.0: Faster and More Flexible Program Phase Analysis

    Greg Hamerly;Erez Perelman;Jeremy Lau;Brad Calder

  • BugNet: Continuously Recording Program Execution for Deterministic Replay Debugging

    Satish Narayanasamy;Gilles Pokam;Brad Calder

  • Using SimPoint for accurate and efficient simulation

    Erez Perelman;Greg Hamerly;Michael Van Biesbrouck;Timothy Sherwood

  • Cache-conscious data placement

    Brad Calder;Chandra Krintz;Simmi John;Todd Austin

  • Discovering and exploiting program phases

    T. Sherwood;E. Perelman;G. Hamerly;S. Sair

  • Selective value prediction

    Brad Calder;Glenn Reinman;Dean M. Tullsen

  • Picking statistically valid and early simulation points

    Erez Perelman;Greg Hamerly;Brad Calder

  • Predictive sequential associative cache

    B. Calder;D. Grunwald;J. Emer

  • Automatically classifying benign and harmful data races using replay analysis

    Satish Narayanasamy;Zhenghao Wang;Jordan Tigani;Andrew Edwards

  • Value profiling

    Brad Calder;Peter Feller;Alan Eustace

  • Reducing indirect function call overhead in C++ programs

    Brad Calder;Dirk Grunwald

  • Quantifying Behavioral Differences Between C and C++ Programs

    Brad Calder;Dirk Grunwald;Benjamin Zorn

  • Procedure placement using temporal ordering information

    Nikolas Gloy;Trevor Blackwell;Michael D. Smith;Brad Calder

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy Sherwood
Timothy Sherwood University of California, Santa Barbara
Dirk Grunwald
Dirk Grunwald University of Colorado Boulder
Dean M. Tullsen
Dean M. Tullsen University of California, San Diego
Satish Narayanasamy
Satish Narayanasamy University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Glenn Reinman
Glenn Reinman University of California, Los Angeles
Andrew A. Chien
Andrew A. Chien University of Chicago
Todd Austin
Todd Austin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lieven Eeckhout
Lieven Eeckhout Ghent University
Chandra Krintz
Chandra Krintz University of California, Santa Barbara
Benjamin G. Zorn
Benjamin G. Zorn Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options can open new doors for students interested in computer science or related fields. For those beginning their academic journey, an associate degree online offers a flexible, accessible way to start building foundational knowledge. This is especially helpful if you need to balance studies with work or family commitments.

Many students are concerned about the cost of higher education. Fortunately, a growing number of institutions now offer affordable online courses that make it easier to pursue your goals without overwhelming debt. Additionally, academic performance barriers are dropping, with several best colleges for low gpa offering quality online programs where you can thrive regardless of your past grades.

A computer science background can also support diverse career paths beyond traditional tech roles. For instance, if you are passionate about sustainability, jobs for environmental science majors may overlap with computing skills in areas like data analysis, modeling, and environmental monitoring. Discover more about the variety of opportunities in this field at jobs for environmental science majors.

Best Scientists Citing Brad Calder

Trending Scientists