World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
61
Citations
21229
World Ranking
3007
National Ranking
1476

Dean M. Tullsen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean M. Tullsen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 191 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Dean M. Tullsen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean M. Tullsen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - ACM Fellow For contributions to the architecture of high-performance processors.
  • 2009 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to the architecture of multithreaded and high-performance processors

Overview

Dean M. Tullsen is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, with a focus on subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Hardware and Architecture, Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The main topics covered by their research include Security and Verification in Computing, Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques, Advanced Malware Detection Techniques, Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture, Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security, Optical Network Technologies, and Network Security and Intrusion Detection.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Dean M. Tullsen include:

  • Automatically Eliminating Speculative Leaks from Cryptographic Code with Blade, 2023, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Swivel: Hardening WebAssembly against Spectre, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Mitigating Speculative Execution Attacks via Context-Sensitive Fencing, 2022, IEEE Design and Test
  • Replication package for article: Automatically Eliminating Speculative Leaks from Cryptographic Code with Blade, 2020, Artifact Digital Object Group
  • Hardware-Assisted Fault Isolation: Going Beyond the Limits of Software-Based Sandboxing, 2024, IEEE Micro

Dean M. Tullsen has frequently published in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Artifact Digital Object Group, IEEE Design and Test, IEEE Micro, and OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University).

Frequent coauthors of Dean M. Tullsen include:

  • Deian Stefan
  • Craig Disselkoen
  • Sunjay Cauligi
  • Mohammadkazem Taram
  • Klaus von Gleissenthall

The scientist has been recognized by their peers with notable distinctions. They received the ACM Fellow award in 2011 for contributions to the architecture of high-performance processors, and the IEEE Fellow award in 2009 for contributions to the architecture of multithreaded and high-performance processors.

Best Publications

  • McPAT: an integrated power, area, and timing modeling framework for multicore and manycore architectures

    Sheng Li;Jung Ho Ahn;Richard D. Strong;Jay B. Brockman

  • Simultaneous multithreading: maximizing on-chip parallelism

    Dean M. Tullsen;Susan J. Eggers;Henry M. Levy

  • Exploiting Choice: Instruction Fetch and Issue on an Implementable Simultaneous Multithreading Processor

    Dean M. Tullsen;Susan J. Eggers;Joel S. Emer;Henry M. Levy

  • Single-ISA heterogeneous multi-core architectures: the potential for processor power reduction

    Rakesh Kumar;Keith I. Farkas;Norman P. Jouppi;Parthasarathy Ranganathan

  • Symbiotic jobscheduling for a simultaneous multithreaded processor

    Allan Snavely;Dean M. Tullsen

  • Single-ISA Heterogeneous Multi-Core Architectures for Multithreaded Workload Performance

    Rakesh Kumar;Dean M. Tullsen;Parthasarathy Ranganathan;Norman P. Jouppi

  • Simultaneous multithreading: a platform for next-generation processors

    S.J. Eggers;J.S. Emer;H.M. Leby;J.L. Lo

  • Interconnections in Multi-Core Architectures: Understanding Mechanisms, Overheads and Scaling

    Rakesh Kumar;Victor Zyuban;Dean M. Tullsen

  • Heterogeneous chip multiprocessors

    R. Kumar;D.M. Tullsen;N.P. Jouppi;P. Ranganathan

  • Speculative precomputation: long-range prefetching of delinquent loads

    Jamison D. Collins;Hong Wang;Dean M. Tullsen;Christopher Hughes

  • Converting thread-level parallelism to instruction-level parallelism via simultaneous multithreading

    Jack L. Lo;Joel S. Emer;Henry M. Levy;Rebecca L. Stamm

  • Handling long-latency loads in a simultaneous multithreading processor

    Dean M. Tullsen;Jeffery A. Brown

  • Selective value prediction

    Brad Calder;Glenn Reinman;Dean M. Tullsen

  • Core architecture optimization for heterogeneous chip multiprocessors

    Rakesh Kumar;Dean M. Tullsen;Norman P. Jouppi

  • Dynamic speculative precomputation

    Jamison D. Collins;Dean M. Tullsen;Hong Wang;John P. Shen

  • Managing distributed ups energy for effective power capping in data centers

    Vasileios Kontorinis;Liuyi Eric Zhang;Baris Aksanli;Jack Sampson

  • Symbiotic jobscheduling with priorities for a simultaneous multithreading processor

    Allan Snavely;Dean M. Tullsen;Geoff Voelker

  • The McPAT Framework for Multicore and Manycore Architectures: Simultaneously Modeling Power, Area, and Timing

    Sheng Li;Jung Ho Ahn;Richard D. Strong;Jay B. Brockman

  • Mitosis compiler: an infrastructure for speculative threading based on pre-computation slices

    Carlos García Quiñones;Carlos Madriles;Jesús Sánchez;Pedro Marcuello

  • Shared register storage mechanisms for multithreaded computer systems with out-of-order execution

    Henry M. Levy;Susan J. Eggers;Jack Lo;Dean M. Tullsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Rakesh Kumar
Rakesh Kumar University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Brad Calder
Brad Calder Google (United States)
Susan J. Eggers
Susan J. Eggers University of Washington
Norman P. Jouppi
Norman P. Jouppi Google (United States)
Henry M. Levy
Henry M. Levy University of Washington
Steven Swanson
Steven Swanson University of California, San Diego
Allan Snavely
Allan Snavely University of California, San Diego
Tajana Rosing
Tajana Rosing University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degree options and rewarding careers. Emerging professionals can enhance their qualifications with interdisciplinary programs such as a best online emba programs, which are ideal for those seeking leadership roles in tech-driven companies.

For those interested in information management, pursuing a library science masters program provides valuable skills in digital organization and research—a crucial asset in the data-centric fields linked to computer science.

If affordability is a priority, numerous cheap online masters programs are available, allowing students to upgrade their expertise without breaking the bank. Many of these programs offer flexible schedules and specializations tailored to fast-growing tech sectors.

Ambitious learners may even consider pursuing a best online doctorate in organizational leadership to prepare for top executive positions. Graduates from these programs often lead innovation, digital transformation, and strategic IT development in global organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Dean M. Tullsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles