World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard Schulz

Richard Schulz

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
28331
World Ranking
19294
National Ranking
815

Richard Schulz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Schulz sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 305 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard Schulz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Schulz sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Characterization of three inhibitors of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vitro and in vivo

    D.D. Rees;R.M.J. Palmer;R. Schulz;H.F. Hodson

  • Enhanced release of superoxide from polymorphonuclear neutrophils in obstructive sleep apnea. Impact of continuous positive airway pressure therapy.

    Richard Schulz;Siamak Mahmoudi;Katja Hattar;Ulf Sibelius

  • Induction and potential biological relevance of a Ca2+‐independent nitric oxide synthase in the myocardium

    R. Schulz;E. Nava;S. Moncada

  • Nitric oxide, superoxide, and peroxynitrite in myocardial ischaemia‐reperfusion injury and preconditioning

    Péter Ferdinandy;Richard Schulz

  • Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Contributes to Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in the Heart

    Po-Yin Cheung;Grzegorz Sawicki;Mieczyslaw Wozniak;Wenjie Wang

  • Development and mechanism of a specific supersensitivity to nitrovasodilators after inhibition of vascular nitric oxide synthesis in vivo.

    S. Moncada;D. D. Rees;R. Schulz;R. M. J. Palmer

  • Intracellular Action of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Accounts for Acute Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury

    Wenjie Wang;Costas J. Schulze;Wilma L. Suarez-Pinzon;Jason R.B. Dyck

  • Peroxynitrite Is a Major Contributor to Cytokine-Induced Myocardial Contractile Failure

    Péter Ferdinandy;Hajira Danial;Ildikó Ambrus;Richard A. Rothery

  • Isolated heart perfusion according to Langendorff---still viable in the new millennium.

    Monika Skrzypiec-Spring;Bartosz Grotthus;Adam Szelag;Richard Schulz

  • Generation of peroxynitrite contributes to ischemia-reperfusion injury in isolated rat hearts

    Wahida Yasmin;Ken D Strynadka;Richard Schulz

  • Cardiomyocyte overexpression of iNOS in mice results in peroxynitrite generation, heart block, and sudden death.

    Imran N. Mungrue;Robert Gros;Xiaomang You;Asif Pirani

  • Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and myocardial oxidative stress injury: beyond the matrix.

    Arulmozhi D Kandasamy;Ava K Chow;Mohammad A M Ali;Richard Schulz

  • Intracellular targets of matrix metalloproteinase-2 in cardiac disease: rationale and therapeutic approaches.

    Richard Schulz

  • Acute actions and novel targets of matrix metalloproteinases in the heart and vasculature

    A K Chow;J Cena;R Schulz

  • Characterization of 5'AMP-activated protein kinase activity in the heart and its role in inhibiting acetyl-CoA carboxylase during reperfusion following ischemia.

    Naomi Kudo;John G. Gillespie;Lina Kung;Lee A. Witters

  • Role of nitric oxide and cGMP in human septic serum-induced depression of cardiac myocyte contractility.

    Anand Kumar;Rupinder Brar;Peter Wang;Linda Dee

  • Serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor are elevated in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and severe nighttime hypoxia.

    Richard Schulz;Christoph Hummel;Sabine Heinemann;Werner Seeger

  • Cardiac Efficiency Is Improved After Ischemia by Altering Both the Source and Fate of Protons

    Bin Liu;Alexander S. Clanachan;Richard Schulz;Gary D. Lopaschuk

  • Degradation of Myosin Light Chain in Isolated Rat Hearts Subjected to Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury A New Intracellular Target for Matrix Metalloproteinase-2

    Grzegorz Sawicki;Hernando Leon;Jolanta Sawicka;Meltem Sariahmetoglu

  • Nitrosative stress and pharmacological modulation of heart failure

    Pal Pacher;Richard Schulz;Lucas Liaudet;Csaba Szabó;Csaba Szabó

Frequent Co-Authors

Mohammed K. Ali
Mohammed K. Ali Emory University
Werner Seeger
Werner Seeger University of Giessen
Edwin E. Daniel
Edwin E. Daniel University of Alberta
Péter Ferdinandy
Péter Ferdinandy Semmelweis University
Gary D. Lopaschuk
Gary D. Lopaschuk University of Alberta
Marek W. Radomski
Marek W. Radomski University of Saskatchewan
Friedrich Grimminger
Friedrich Grimminger University of Giessen
Salvador Moncada
Salvador Moncada University of Manchester
Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani
Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani University of Giessen
Michael J. Hendzel
Michael J. Hendzel University of Alberta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in a healthcare career but not ready to pursue a traditional medicine degree, there are flexible online options that can open meaningful pathways. Many students now opt for specialized fields with strong job growth and rewarding prospects.

A popular choice is a health information management degree online, equipping you with expertise to manage patient data and healthcare technologies. This field is essential in modern hospitals and clinics.

For those seeking entry into healthcare administration, medical billing and coding online courses provide focused training. These programs lead to opportunities with insurance companies, clinics, and private practices.

Nursing remains a highly respected career. Affordable pathways include cheapest online fnp program options, allowing registered nurses to advance as Family Nurse Practitioners. Additionally, many students explore affordable online nursing programs to earn their degrees with added flexibility.

Each of these online degrees offers a unique blend of in-demand skills, flexible study, and strong job security in the evolving US healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Schulz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles