World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
8151
World Ranking
5498
National Ranking
570

John Keady publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Keady sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 298 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John Keady D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Keady sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Keady is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on dementia, aging, and related social and health care issues.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the fields of Health Professions, Medicine, and Social Sciences, with 33, 26, and 20 publications respectively. Within these broader domains, key subfields include General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, and Clinical Psychology.

Keady's research topics encompass a range of areas such as Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Aging and Elder Care, Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes, Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Migration, Aging and Tourism Studies, Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving, and Family Caregiving in Mental Illness.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "What is important to people with dementia living at home? A set of core outcome items for use in the evaluation of non-pharmacological community-based health and social care interventions" (2020) published in Age and Ageing
  • "Re-thinking and re-positioning 'being in the moment' within a continuum of moments: introducing a new conceptual framework for dementia studies" (2020) published in Ageing and Society
  • "Beyond the shrinking world: dementia, localisation and neighbourhood" (2021) published in Ageing and Society
  • "Neighbourhoods as relational places for people living with dementia" (2020) published in Social Science & Medicine
  • "In the moment with music: an exploration of the embodied and sensory experiences of people living with dementia during improvised music-making" (2021) published in Ageing and Society

Keady has collaborated frequently with several co-authors including Kirstein Rummery, Kainde Manji, Agneta Kullberg, Elzana Odzakovic, and Andrew L. Clark.

Their publications appear repeatedly in specific academic venues such as Ageing and Society, Dementia, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, and Alzheimer's & Dementia.

In addition to journal articles, John Keady has contributed to book publications, including the title "Design for People Living with Dementia: Interactions and Innovations" published by Lancaster University in 2021.

Best Publications

  • General practitioners' knowledge, confidence and attitudes in the diagnosis and management of dementia

    Stephen Turner;Steve Iliffe;Murna Downs;Jane Wilcock

  • Understanding Family Care : A Multidimensional Model of Caring and Coping

    Mike Nolan;Gordon Grant;John Keady

  • Effectiveness of educational interventions in improving detection and management of dementia in primary care: cluster randomised controlled study

    Murna Downs;Stephen Turner;Michelle Bryans;Jane Wilcock

  • Rewards and gratifications among family caregivers: towards a refined model of caring and coping.

    G Grant;P Ramcharan;M McGrath;M Nolan

  • Transforming students' views of gerontological nursing: Realising the potential of 'enriched' environments of learning and care : A multi-method longitudinal study

    Jayne Brown;Mike Nolan;Sue Davies;Janet Nolan

  • The transition to dementia--individual and family experiences of receiving a diagnosis: a review.

    Louise Robinson;Alan Gemski;Clare Abley;John Bond

  • REMCARE: reminiscence groups for people with dementia and their family caregivers - effectiveness and cost-effectiveness pragmatic multicentre randomised trial

    RT Woods;E Bruce;RT Edwards;R Elvish

  • Navigating the grounded theory terrain. Part 2

    Andrew Hunter;Kathy Murphy;Annmarie Grealish;Dympna Casey

  • Everyday conversation in dementia: a review of the literature to inform research and practice.

    Jacqueline Kindell;John Keady;Karen Sage;Raymond Wilkinson

  • Selfhood in younger onset dementia: transitions and testimonies.

    Phyllis Braudy Harris;John Keady

  • Developing a typology of family care: implications for nurses and other service providers.

    Mike Nolan;John Keady;Gordon Grant

  • ‘Getting to Know Me’: the development and evaluation of a training programme for enhancing skills in the care of people with dementia in general hospital settings

    Ruth Elvish;Simon Burrow;Rosanne Cawley;Kathryn Harney

  • Psychological interventions for carers of people with dementia: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence

    Ruth Elvish;Sammi-Jo Lever;Jodie Johnstone;Rosanne Cawley

  • Working together with persons with early stage dementia and their family members to design a user-friendly technology-based support service

    Elizabeth Hanson;Lennart Magnusson;Helene Arvidsson;Anette Claesson

  • REMCARE: Pragmatic Multi-Centre Randomised Trial of Reminiscence Groups for People with Dementia and their Family Carers: Effectiveness and Economic Analysis

    Robert T Woods;Martin Orrell;Errollyn Bruce;Rhiannon T Edwards

  • Negotiating a labyrinth: experiences of assessment and diagnostic journey in cognitive impairment and dementia.

    Kritika Samsi;Clare Abley;Sarah Campbell;John Keady;John Keady

  • The lived neighborhood: understanding how people with dementia engage with their local environment

    Richard Ward;Andrew Clark;Sarah Campbell;Barbara Graham

  • Approaching the end of life and dying with dementia in care homes: The accounts of family carers

    J. Hennings;Katherine Froggatt;J. Keady

  • Editorial The narrative voice of people with dementia

    Siôn Williams;John Keady

  • Neighbourhoods and dementia in the health and social care context: a realist review of the literature and implications for UK policy development

    John Keady;Sarah Campbell;Helen Barnes;Richard Ward

  • Subjective experiences of younger people with dementia and their families: implications for UK research, policy and practice

    Pamela Roach;John Keady;Penny Bee;Kevin Hope

Frequent Co-Authors

Steve Iliffe
Steve Iliffe University College London
Paula R Williamson
Paula R Williamson University of Liverpool
Ronan E. O'Carroll
Ronan E. O'Carroll University of Stirling
Anne Corbett
Anne Corbett University of Exeter
Anne B. Young
Anne B. Young Harvard University
John Holmes
John Holmes University of Sheffield
Jill Manthorpe
Jill Manthorpe King's College London
Linda Davies
Linda Davies University of Manchester
Alistair Burns
Alistair Burns University of Manchester
Ray Wilkinson
Ray Wilkinson University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a Psychology degree in the USA, exploring online programs can open up flexible and affordable options. Many universities now offer accredited online psychology degrees that are recognized by employers and educational institutions alike. Choosing the right program means balancing cost, accreditation, and your specific career interests—whether you aim for clinical practice, research, counseling, or another related field.

The cheapest psychology programs in Houston provide a valuable overview of affordable opportunities in Texas, while the cheapest psychology programs in Illinois highlight budget-friendly schools in the Midwest. Students interested in the Great Lakes region can refer to the cheapest psychology degrees in Indiana for local, cost-effective options. Additionally, the cheapest psychology degrees in Kentucky offer further affordable pathways in the South.

Regardless of location, completing an online psychology degree can lead to careers in mental health, education, human resources, and social services. Affordable programs help minimize student debt, making it easier to enter rewarding professions or pursue further graduate study.

Best Scientists Citing John Keady

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles