World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6656 6198 667 635 179 8786

Paul M. Camic publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul M. Camic between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul M. Camic published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2023. 14 of the 220 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2023. 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 7 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 13 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 4 publications
1981 2025

220 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul M. Camic: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 2
1982 2
1983 1
1984 0
1985 3
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 3
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 3
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 7
2004 3
2005 0
2006 1
2007 3
2008 4
2009 12
2010 6
2011 9
2012 19
2013 13
2014 1
2015 13
2016 16
2017 12
2018 6
2019 8
2020 9
2021 17
2022 5
2023 21
2024 10
2025 4
Total 220
Download as CSV

Paul M. Camic publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Camic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 179 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 179
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul M. Camic D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Camic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul M. Camic is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Psychiatry and Mental Health. They have made contributions to related subfields including General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, and Conservation.

The scientist's prolific output includes studies centered on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Mental Health and Patient Involvement, and Art Therapy and Mental Health. Other prominent topics in their work cover Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes, Music Therapy and Health, Aging and Gerontology Research, and Neuroscience and Music Perception.

Paul M. Camic has published multiple papers in a variety of venues, frequently appearing in:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Wellcome Open Research
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BMC Geriatrics

Recent publications illustrate their research interests and engagement with current scientific issues. Notable papers include:

  • "Symptom-led staging for semantic and non-fluent/agrammatic variants of primary progressive aphasia" (2023), published in Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • "Psychosocial outcomes of dyadic arts interventions for people with a dementia and their informal caregivers: A systematic review" (2020), published in Health & Social Care in the Community
  • "Dementia in rural settings: a scoping review exploring the personal experiences of people with dementia and their carers" (2023), published in Ageing and Society
  • "Peer support for people living with rare or young onset dementia: An integrative review" (2022), published in Dementia
  • "Symptom-based staging for logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia" (2024), published in European Journal of Neurology

Their collaboration network includes frequent coauthors such as Sebastian J. Crutch, Emilie Brotherhood, Emma Harding, Joshua Stott, and Mary Pat Sullivan. These colleagues have co-authored numerous publications jointly with Paul M. Camic.

Best Publications

  • Qualitative research in psychology : expanding perspectives in methodology and design

    Paul M. Camic;Jean E. Rhodes;Lucy Yardley

  • APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological.

    Harris Cooper;Paul M. Camic;Debra L. Long;A. T. Panter

  • Non-clinical community interventions: a systematised review of social prescribing schemes

    Helen J. Chatterjee;Paul M. Camic;Bridget Lockyer;Linda J. M. Thomson

  • Gardening as a mental health intervention: a review

    Jane Clatworthy;Joe Hinds;Paul M. Camic

  • Museums and art galleries as partners for public health interventions

    Paul M Camic;Helen J Chatterjee

  • Viewing and making art together: a multi-session art-gallery-based intervention for people with dementia and their carers

    Paul M. Camic;Victoria Tischler;Chantal Helen Pearman

  • Does a 'Singing Together Group' improve the quality of life of people with a dementia and their carers? A pilot evaluation study.

    Paul M Camic;Caroline Myferi Williams;Frances Meeten

  • Naming the stars: integrating qualitative methods into psychological research

    Paul M. Camic;Jean E. Rhodes;Lucy Yardley

  • Playing in the mud: health psychology, the arts and creative approaches to health care.

    Paul M. Camic

  • Supportive adult relationships and the academic engagement of Latin American immigrant youth.

    Gillian Green;Jean Rhodes;Abigail Heitler Hirsch;Carola Suárez-Orozco

  • The impact of community-based arts and health interventions on cognition in people with dementia: a systematic literature review

    Rhea Young;Paul M. Camic;Victoria Tischler

  • Benefits of choral singing for social and mental wellbeing: qualitative findings from a cross‐national survey of choir members

    Laetitia Livesey;Ian Morrison;Stephen Clift;Paul Camic

  • Effects of a museum-based social prescription intervention on quantitative measures of psychological wellbeing in older adults

    Linda J Thomson;Bridget Lockyer;Paul M Camic;Helen J Chatterjee

  • Oxford textbook of creative arts, health and wellbeing: international perspectives on practice, policy and research.

    Stephen Clift;Paul M. Camic

  • The state of arts and health in England

    Stephen Clift;Paul M. Camic;Brian Chapman;Gavin Clayton

  • Improving middle school climate through teacher-centered change

    Jean E. Rhodes;Paul M. Camic;Michael Milburn;Sarah R. Lowe

  • Art galleries, episodic memory and verbal fluency in dementia: an exploratory study

    Catherine Eekelaar;Paul M. Camic;Neil Springham

  • Theorizing How Art Gallery Interventions Impact People With Dementia and Their Caregivers

    Paul M. Camic;Erin L. Baker;Victoria Tischler

  • APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics.

    Harris Cooper;Paul M. Camic;Debra L. Long;A. T. Panter

  • Research designs : quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological

    Harris M. Cooper;Paul Marc Camic

  • Museums and art galleries as partners for public health

    Paul M Camic;Salomons Campus;Tunbridge Wells;Kent Tn

Frequent Co-Authors

Sebastian J. Crutch
Sebastian J. Crutch University College London
Stephen Clift
Stephen Clift Canterbury Christ Church University
Jean E. Rhodes
Jean E. Rhodes University of Massachusetts Boston
Harris Cooper
Harris Cooper Duke University
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol
Kenneth J. Sher
Kenneth J. Sher University of Missouri
Christopher K. Zarins
Christopher K. Zarins Stanford University
Chris Barker
Chris Barker University College London
Jason D. Warren
Jason D. Warren University College London
Judith K. Ockene
Judith K. Ockene University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA can open doors to a range of related fields, especially as online education becomes more accessible nationwide. Many students choose to explore social work as a complementary or alternative career, thanks to its focus on human behavior and community support.

If you are interested in advancing quickly, you may want to consider fastest online social work bachelor's degree programs in America. These programs offer flexible study options while accelerating your path to graduation.

Depending on your location, there are also region-specific options. For those in the Southwest, accelerated online social work degrees in Arizona are available; students on the West Coast can explore fastest online social work degrees in California. In the Northeast, prospective graduates may prefer accelerated online social work degrees in Massachusetts.

These flexible online pathways can help you build expertise in areas closely related to psychology, equipping you for rewarding roles in mental health, counseling, and community support.

Best Scientists Citing Paul M. Camic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles