World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
82
Citations
20725
World Ranking
984
National Ranking
529

Scott Mahlke publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Mahlke sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 321 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Scott Mahlke D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Mahlke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - ACM Fellow For contributions in compiler code generation for instruction level parallelism, and customized microprocessor architectures
  • 2013 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Scott Mahlke is a researcher affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their main area of expertise lies within computer science, with a significant focus on artificial intelligence, computer networks and communications, computer vision and pattern recognition, software, and automotive engineering.

Their scholarly work spans multiple topics including advanced neural network applications, adversarial robustness in machine learning, software testing and debugging techniques, caching and content delivery, machine learning and data classification, autonomous vehicle technology and safety, and software reliability and analysis research.

Recent papers authored by or involving Scott Mahlke include:

  • A Systematic Framework to Identify Violations of Scenario-dependent Driving Rules in Autonomous Vehicle Software, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems
  • BitSET: Bit-Serial Early Termination for Computation Reduction in Convolutional Neural Networks, 2023, ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
  • AVMaestro: A Centralized Policy Enforcement Framework for Safe Autonomous-driving Environments, 2022, 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
  • A Systematic Framework to Identify Violations of Scenario-dependent Driving Rules in Autonomous Vehicle Software, 2021, ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
  • LSM-GNN: Large-scale Storage-based Multi-GPU GNN Training by Optimizing Data Transfer Scheme, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)

Scott Mahlke has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Reetuparna Das, Qingzhao Zhang, David Hong, Qi Alfred Chen, and Z. Morley Mao.

Their publications are found in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems, 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), and ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review.

Throughout their career, Scott Mahlke has received recognitions including becoming an ACM Senior Member in 2013 and being named an ACM Fellow in 2020 for contributions in compiler code generation for instruction level parallelism and customized microprocessor architectures.

Best Publications

  • Effective compiler support for predicated execution using the hyperblock

    Scott A. Mahlke;David C. Lin;William Y. Chen;Richard E. Hank

  • The superblock: an effective technique for VLIW and superscalar compilation

    Wen-Mei W. Hwu;Scott A. Mahlke;William Y. Chen;Pohua P. Chang

  • COMET: code offload by migrating execution transparently

    Mark S. Gordon;D. Anoushe Jamshidi;Scott Mahlke;Z. Morley Mao

  • IMPACT: an architectural framework for multiple-instruction-issue processors

    Pohua P. Chang;Scott A. Mahlke;William Y. Chen;Nancy J. Warter

  • Scalpel: Customizing DNN Pruning to the Underlying Hardware Parallelism

    Jiecao Yu;Andrew Lukefahr;David Palframan;Ganesh Dasika

  • SAGE: self-tuning approximation for graphics engines

    Mehrzad Samadi;Janghaeng Lee;D. Anoushe Jamshidi;Amir Hormati

  • Using profile information to assist classic code optimizations

    Pohua P. Chang;Scott A. Mahlke;Wen-mei W. Hwu

  • SODA: A Low-power Architecture For Software Radio

    Yuan Lin;Hyunseok Lee;Mark Woh;Yoav Harel

  • Shoestring: probabilistic soft error reliability on the cheap

    Shuguang Feng;Shantanu Gupta;Amin Ansari;Scott Mahlke

  • Processor acceleration through automated instruction set customization

    Nathan Clark;Hongtao Zhong;Scott Mahlke

  • Orchestrating the execution of stream programs on multicore platforms

    Manjunath Kudlur;Scott Mahlke

  • Paraprox: pattern-based approximation for data parallel applications

    Mehrzad Samadi;Davoud Anoushe Jamshidi;Janghaeng Lee;Scott Mahlke

  • A comparison of full and partial predicated execution support for ILP processors

    Scott A. Mahlke;Richard E. Hank;James E. McCormick;David I. August

  • BulletProof: a defect-tolerant CMP switch architecture

    K. Constantinides;S. Plaza;J. Blome;B. Zhang

  • Edge-centric modulo scheduling for coarse-grained reconfigurable architectures

    Hyunchul Park;Kevin Fan;Scott A. Mahlke;Taewook Oh

  • IMPACT: an architectural framework for multiple-instruction-issue processors

    Unknown

  • Application-Specific Processing on a General-Purpose Core via Transparent Instruction Set Customization

    Nathan Clark;Manjunath Kudlur;Hyunchul Park;Scott Mahlke

  • Profile-guided automatic inline expansion for C programs

    Pohua P. Chang;Scott A. Mahlke;William Y. Chen;Wen-mei W. Hwu

  • Reliable Systems on Unreliable Fabrics

    T. Austin;V. Bertacco;S. Mahlke;Yu Cao

  • Composite Cores: Pushing Heterogeneity Into a Core

    Andrew Lukefahr;Shruti Padmanabha;Reetuparna Das;Faissal M. Sleiman

  • Effective compiler support for predicated execution using the hyperblock

    Scott A. Mahlke;David C. Lin;William Y. Chen;Richard E. Hank

  • The superblock: an effective technique for VLIW and superscalar compilation

    Wen-Mei W. Hwu;Scott A. Mahlke;William Y. Chen;Pohua P. Chang

Frequent Co-Authors

Wen-mei W. Hwu
Wen-mei W. Hwu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Trevor Mudge
Trevor Mudge University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Chaitali Chakrabarti
Chaitali Chakrabarti Arizona State University
Krisztian Flautner
Krisztian Flautner University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Reetuparna Das
Reetuparna Das University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stéphane Lafortune
Stéphane Lafortune University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David I. August
David I. August Princeton University
Ronald G. Dreslinski
Ronald G. Dreslinski University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Todd Austin
Todd Austin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jason Mars
Jason Mars University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Computer Science opens up a wide range of related online programs and certifications that can enhance your skills and boost your career. Many students look for pathways that offer both flexibility and affordability, especially when considering further education or career advancement in the tech industry.

For those interested in analytics, the cheapest data science masters in USA offer an excellent opportunity to specialize without incurring high tuition costs. If hardware, systems, or electronics are your interests, enrolling in one of the top online electrical engineering schools can complement your computer science background and open doors to new fields.

Earning a graduate degree isn’t the only route—many professionals pursue certifications for jobs to quickly gain specialized expertise and access high-paying roles. If you want to upskill or transition into a new role even faster, you might be interested in the shortest masters degree programs online, which allow you to complete your education in less time.

By exploring these related online degrees and career pathways, you can tailor your learning journey to fit your goals, schedule, and budget—ensuring a strong start or advancement in the fast-paced tech world.

Best Scientists Citing Scott Mahlke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles