World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
13005
World Ranking
9056
National Ranking
3847

Jeanne Ferrante publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanne Ferrante sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 104 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jeanne Ferrante D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanne Ferrante sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1996 - ACM Fellow For the development of intermediate program representations for program optimization and parallelization that are fundamental to current optimizing compilers.

Overview

Jeanne Ferrante is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. The academic work is recognized in the field of computer science, particularly revolving around program optimization and parallelization.

In 1996, Jeanne Ferrante was awarded the title of ACM Fellow. The award citation mentions contributions toward the development of intermediate program representations for program optimization and parallelization that are fundamental to current optimizing compilers.

The scope of research conducted by Jeanne Ferrante has involved areas that underpin the design and improvement of compiler technology. This includes the study and development of program representations that facilitate the analysis and transformation of computer programs to enhance execution efficiency.

Best Publications

  • The program dependence graph and its use in optimization

    Jeanne Ferrante;Karl J. Ottenstein;Joe D. Warren

  • Efficiently computing static single assignment form and the control dependence graph

    Ron Cytron;Jeanne Ferrante;Barry K. Rosen;Mark N. Wegman

  • An efficient method of computing static single assignment form

    R. Cytron;J. Ferrante;B. K. Rosen;M. N. Wegman

  • Automatic construction of sparse data flow evaluation graphs

    Jong-Deok Choi;Ron Cytron;Jeanne Ferrante

  • An overview of the PTRAN analysis system for multiprocessing

    F. Allen;M. Burke;P. Charles;R. Cytron

  • The computational complexity of logical theories

    Jeanne Ferrante;Charles W. Rackoff

  • A Decision Procedure for the First Order Theory of Real Addition with Order

    Jeanne Ferrante;Charles Rackoff

  • Scheduling strategies for master-slave tasking on heterogeneous processor platforms

    C. Banino;O. Beaumont;L. Carter;J. Ferrante

  • On Estimating and Enhancing Cache Effectiveness

    Jeanne Ferrante;Vivek Sarkar;W. Thrash

  • An overview of the PTRAN analysis system for multiprocessing

    Unknown

  • Bandwidth-centric allocation of independent tasks on heterogeneous platforms

    O. Beaumont;L. Carter;J. Ferrante;A. Legrand

  • Static slicing in the presence of goto statements

    Jong-Deok Choi;Jeanne Ferrante

  • Compile-time composition of run-time data and iteration reorderings

    Michelle Mills Strout;Larry Carter;Jeanne Ferrante

  • Quantifying the multi-level nature of tiling interactions

    Nicholas Mitchell;Karin Högstedt;Larry Carter;Jeanne Ferrante

  • Localizing non-affine array references

    Nicholas Mitchell;Larry Carter;Jeanne Ferrante

  • What's In a Name? -or- The Value of Renaming for Parallelism Detection and Storage Allocation.

    Ron Cytron;Jeanne Ferrante

  • Modeling parallel computers as memory hierarchies

    B. Alpern;L. Carter;J. Ferrante

  • Centralized versus Distributed Schedulers for Bag-of-Tasks Applications

    O. Beaumont;L. Carter;J. Ferrante;A. Legrand

  • Schedule-independent storage mapping for loops

    Michelle Mills Strout;Larry Carter;Jeanne Ferrante;Beth Simon

  • A framework for determining useful parallelism

    F. Allen;M. Burke;R. Cytron;J. Ferrante

  • Sparse Tiling for Stationary Iterative Methods

    Michelle Mills Strout;Larry Carter;Jeanne Ferrante;Barbara Kreaseck

Frequent Co-Authors

Ron K. Cytron
Ron K. Cytron Washington University in St. Louis
Beth Simon
Beth Simon University of California, San Diego
Vivek Sarkar
Vivek Sarkar Georgia Institute of Technology
Brad Calder
Brad Calder Google (United States)
Henri Casanova
Henri Casanova University of Hawaii at Manoa
Jong-Deok Choi
Jong-Deok Choi Samsung (South Korea)
Yves Robert
Yves Robert École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
Samuel P. Midkiff
Samuel P. Midkiff Purdue University West Lafayette
Manish Gupta
Manish Gupta Google (United States)
Jan F. Prins
Jan F. Prins University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online degrees and career trajectories. For students interested in expanding their skill set, pursuing an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering offers a strong foundation in both hardware and software, further boosting career opportunities in tech and engineering sectors.

If you’re seeking a faster route to entering the workforce, consider certificate programs that pay well. Many of these certificates can be completed in less than a year and offer valuable, job-ready skills in areas like cybersecurity, IT support, and networking.

For those looking to quickly advance their careers, there are also options for the shortest master degree programs available online, which allow students to earn an advanced credential in as little as 12 months.

Wondering which program could have the biggest impact on your career? It's helpful to review which master's degree is most in demand in usa to make a smart investment in your future. Choosing the right program—whether bachelor’s, master’s, or certification—can dramatically shape your employment prospects in the tech world.

Best Scientists Citing Jeanne Ferrante

Trending Scientists