World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
13938
World Ranking
11419
National Ranking
4692

Susan Horwitz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan Horwitz sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 67 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Susan Horwitz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan Horwitz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Susan Horwitz was affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their academic career involved engagement in research and teaching at this institution.

No specific recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues are available in the data to detail their research contributions or collaborations. Similarly, there is no available information on specific fields, subfields, or topics of study associated with their work.

There is also no record of book publications or awards received in the source data provided.

Due to the lack of detailed data, it is not possible to elaborate on particular research themes, publication impact, or professional achievements. The profile focuses solely on the verified institutional connection and the status of being deceased.

Best Publications

  • Interprocedural slicing using dependence graphs

    Susan Horwitz;Thomas Reps;David Binkley

  • Interprocedural slicing using dependence graphs

    Susan Horwitz;Thomas Reps;David Binkley

  • Precise interprocedural dataflow analysis via graph reachability

    Thomas Reps;Susan Horwitz;Mooly Sagiv

  • Using Slicing to Identify Duplication in Source Code

    Raghavan Komondoor;Susan Horwitz

  • Integrating noninterfering versions of programs

    Susan Horwitz;Jan Prins;Thomas Reps

  • Integrating non-intering versions of programs

    S. Horwitz;J. Prins;T. Reps

  • The use of program dependence graphs in software engineering

    Susan Horwitz;Thomas Reps

  • Fast and accurate flow-insensitive points-to analysis

    Marc Shapiro;Susan Horwitz

  • Precise interprocedural dataflow analysis with applications to constant propagation

    Mooly Sagiv;Thomas Reps;Susan Horwitz

  • Incremental program testing using program dependence graphs

    Samuel Bates;Susan Horwitz

  • Dependence analysis for pointer variables

    S. Horwitz;P. Pfeiffer;T. Reps

  • Speeding up slicing

    Thomas Reps;Susan Horwitz;Mooly Sagiv;Genevieve Rosay

  • Demand interprocedural dataflow analysis

    Susan Horwitz;Thomas Reps;Mooly Sagiv

  • Slicing Programs with Arbitrary Control-flow

    Thomas Ball;Susan Horwitz

  • On the adequacy of program dependence graphs for representing programs

    S. Horwitz;J. Prins;T. Reps

  • Identifying the semantic and textual differences between two versions of a program

    Susan Horwitz

  • Precise flow-insensitive may-alias analysis is NP-hard

    Susan Horwitz

  • Program integration for languages with procedure calls

    David Binkley;Susan Horwitz;Thomas Reps

  • Protecting C programs from attacks via invalid pointer dereferences

    Suan Hsi Yong;Susan Horwitz

  • The Effects of the Precision of Pointer Analysis

    Marc Shapiro;Susan Horwitz

  • Precise Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis with Applications to Constant Propagation

    Shmuel Sagiv;Thomas W. Reps;Susan Horwitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Reps
Thomas Reps University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jan F. Prins
Jan F. Prins University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Mooly Sagiv
Mooly Sagiv Tel Aviv University
David Binkley
David Binkley Loyola University Maryland
Thomas Ball
Thomas Ball Microsoft (United States)
Barbara G. Ryder
Barbara G. Ryder Virginia Tech
Ben Liblit
Ben Liblit University of Wisconsin–Madison
Matthew S. Allen
Matthew S. Allen Brigham Young University
Susanne E. Hambrusch
Susanne E. Hambrusch Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Computer Science opens doors to numerous online education and career opportunities. If you’re considering alternative pathways or complementary fields, it's helpful to investigate the best majors in college that can align with your interests and broaden your skillset.

For those seeking advanced degrees, flexibility and duration matter. Many students look for the easiest masters degree to get online, balancing career growth with ease of completion. Pursuing graduate studies online can fit various lifestyles and employment situations.

Affordability is another key issue. Today, there are several options for the cheapest doctorate degree online, making it more feasible to obtain a terminal degree in your field without significant financial burden.

Some may also consider fast-tracked doctoral programs like the online edd, especially for those interested in educational technology or academic leadership. These accelerated programs help students enter leadership roles in a shorter timeframe.

Best Scientists Citing Susan Horwitz

Recently Published Articles