World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tibor Gyimóthy

Tibor Gyimóthy

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5835
World Ranking
10273
National Ranking
9

Tibor Gyimóthy publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tibor Gyimóthy sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 177 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Tibor Gyimóthy D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tibor Gyimóthy sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tibor Gyimóthy is affiliated with the University of Szeged in Hungary and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, particularly in software engineering and software reliability research. Their work spans multiple subfields including information systems, software development, and signal processing.

Their recent publications reveal a focus on software testing, debugging techniques, and bug prediction methodologies. Notable papers include "A public unified bug dataset for java and its assessment regarding metrics and bug prediction" (2020, Software Quality Journal), "Deep learning in static, metric-based bug prediction" (2020, Array), and "Static JavaScript Call Graphs: A Comparative Study" (2024, arXiv (Cornell University)). Other relevant contributions are "Using contextual knowledge in interactive fault localization" (2022, Empirical Software Engineering) and "Unified Bug Dataset" (2020, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)).

Focus areas in the main topics of their research are:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Web Data Mining and Analysis
  • Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Tibor Gyimóthy include:

  • Rudolf Ferenć
  • Zoltán Tóth
  • Gergely Ladányi
  • István Siket
  • Dénes Bán

Their work appears regularly in publication venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Software Quality Journal
  • Array
  • Empirical Software Engineering

Within computer science, Gyimóthy's research intersects multiple subfields:

  • Information Systems
  • Software
  • Signal Processing
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Geography, Planning and Development

The body of work demonstrates a sustained engagement with software engineering problems, data mining, and reliability assessment, contributing both empirical studies and methodologies relevant to fault localization and bug dataset development.

Best Publications

  • Empirical validation of object-oriented metrics on open source software for fault prediction

    T. Gyimothy;R. Ferenc;I. Siket

  • Using information retrieval based coupling measures for impact analysis

    Denys Poshyvanyk;Andrian Marcus;Rudolf Ferenc;Tibor Gyimóthy

  • Columbus - reverse engineering tool and schema for C++

    R. Ferenc;A. Beszedes;M. Tarkiainen;T. Gyimothy

  • An efficient relevant slicing method for debugging

    Tibor Gyimóthy;Árpád Beszédes;Istán Forgács

  • Generalized algorithmic debugging and testing

    Peter Fritzson;Nahid Shahmehri;Mariam Kamkar;Tibor Gyimothy

  • The szeged treebank

    Dóra Csendes;János Csirik;Tibor Gyimóthy;András Kocsor

  • A probabilistic software quality model

    Tibor Bakota;Peter Hegedus;Peter Kortvelyesi;Rudolf Ferenc

  • Clone Smells in Software Evolution

    T. Bakota;R. Ferenc;T. Gyimothy

  • Survey of code-size reduction methods

    Árpád Beszédes;Rudolf Ferenc;Tibor Gyimóthy;André Dolenc

  • Dynamic slicing method for maintenance of large C programs

    A. Beszedes;T. Gergely;Z. Mihaly Szabo;J. Csirik

  • Modeling class cohesion as mixtures of latent topics

    Yixun Liu;Denys Poshyvanyk;Rudolf Ferenc;Tibor Gyimothy

  • Extracting facts from open source software

    R. Ferenc;I. Siket;T. Gyimothy

  • The Szeged Corpus: A POS Tagged and Syntactically Annotated Hungarian Natural Language Corpus

    Dóra Csendes;János Csirik;Tibor Gyimóthy

  • Generalized algorithmic debugging and testing

    Peter Fritzson;Tibor Gyimothy;Mariam Kamkar;Nahid Shahmehri

  • Theoretical foundations of dynamic program slicing

    Dave Binkley;Sebastian Danicic;Tibor Gyimóthy;Mark Harman

  • Towards a standard schema for C/C++

    R. Ferenc;S.E. Sim;R.C. Holt;R. Koschke

  • Constructing control flows graphs of binary executable programs at post-link time

    Attila Bicsák;Ákos Kiss;Rudolf Ferenc;Tibor Gyimóthy

  • New Conceptual Coupling and Cohesion Metrics for Object-Oriented Systems

    Bela Ujhazi;Rudolf Ferenc;Denys Poshyvanyk;Tibor Gyimothy

  • Interprocedural static slicing of binary executables

    A. Kiss;J. Jasz;G. Lehotai;T. Gyimothy

  • A formalisation of the relationship between forms of program slicing

    Dave Binkley;Sebastian Danicic;Tibor Gyimóthy;Mark Harman

  • IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM2005)

    Václav Rajlich;Tibor Gyimóthy

Frequent Co-Authors

Rudolf Ferenc
Rudolf Ferenc University of Szeged
János Csirik
János Csirik University of Szeged
Tamas L. Horvath
Tamas L. Horvath Yale University
Mark Harman
Mark Harman University College London
Vaclav Rajlich
Vaclav Rajlich Wayne State University
Márk Jelasity
Márk Jelasity University of Szeged
Gerardo Canfora
Gerardo Canfora University of Sannio
Stefan Wolf
Stefan Wolf Universita della Svizzera Italiana
David Binkley
David Binkley Loyola University Maryland
Denys Poshyvanyk
Denys Poshyvanyk William & Mary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science study options in the USA unveils a range of flexible online degrees to fit different goals and budgets. For those eager to advance quickly, the shortest online masters degree programs allow students to earn advanced credentials in less time. This can be a major advantage for career changers or working professionals aiming to boost their prospects without a lengthy commitment.

If you’re assessing return on investment, choosing graduate degrees that are worth it is crucial. These degrees are specially designed to align with the strongest job markets and employer demands in tech and related fields.

Beginners or those seeking a quicker entry to the workforce might consider an online associate's degree in computer science or IT. These two-year programs deliver foundational skills and can pave the way for further education or immediate employment.

Cost is often a concern, and many students seek options at the most affordable online colleges. These institutions provide high-quality education without overwhelming debt, making computer science careers more accessible to all.

Best Scientists Citing Tibor Gyimóthy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles