World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
8141
World Ranking
6547
National Ranking
2894

Maxine Eskenazi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maxine Eskenazi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 190 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Maxine Eskenazi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maxine Eskenazi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maxine Eskenazi is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research primarily contributes to the field of computer science, with a strong focus on artificial intelligence.

The main research topics covered in their work include:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing

They have published extensively, with 50 works classified under computer science and 42 specifically within artificial intelligence. Other areas of study addressed in their publications include computer science applications, computer vision and pattern recognition, information systems, and developmental and educational psychology.

Frequent publication venues by Maxine Eskenazi include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing
  • Information
  • TIB Data Manager

Notable recent papers are:

  • Overview of the Ninth Dialog System Technology Challenge: DSTC9, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Overview of the Ninth Dialog System Technology Challenge: DSTC9, 2024, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing
  • Report from the NSF Future Directions Workshop on Automatic Evaluation of Dialog: Research Directions and Challenges, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Improving zero and few-shot generalization in dialogue through instruction tuning, 2024, TIB Data Manager
  • Report from the NSF Future Directions Workshop, Toward User-Oriented Agents: Research Directions and Challenges, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Their research collaborations include frequent co-authors such as Shikib Mehri, David Traum, Cathy Jiao, Jeffrey P. Bigham, and Luis Fernando D'Haro.

Best Publications

  • Learning Discourse-level Diversity for Neural Dialog Models using Conditional Variational Autoencoders

    Tiancheng Zhao;Ran Zhao;Maxine Eskenazi

  • An overview of spoken language technology for education

    Maxine Eskenazi

  • Let's Go Public! Taking a Spoken Dialog System to the Real World

    Antoine Raux;Brian Langner;Dan Bohus;Alan W. Black

  • Automatic Question Generation for Vocabulary Assessment

    Jonathan Brown;Gwen Frishkoff;Maxine Eskenazi

  • BREF, a large vocabulary spoken corpus for French.

    Lori F. Larnel;Jean-Luc Gauvain;Maxine Eskénazi

  • USING AUTOMATIC SPEECH PROCESSING FOR FOREIGN LANGUAGE PRONUNCIATION TUTORING: SOME ISSUES AND A PROTOTYPE

    Maxine Eskenazi

  • Combining Lexical and Grammatical Features to Improve Readability Measures for First and Second Language Texts

    Michael Heilman;Kevyn Collins-Thompson;Jamie Callan;Maxine Eskenazi

  • Towards End-to-End Learning for Dialog State Tracking and Management using Deep Reinforcement Learning

    Tiancheng Zhao;Maxine Eskenazi

  • An Analysis of Statistical Models and Features for Reading Difficulty Prediction

    Michael Heilman;Kevyn Collins-Thompson;Maxine Eskenazi

  • Doing Research on a Deployed Spoken Dialogue System: One Year of Let's Go! Experience

    Antoine Raux;Dan Bohus;Brian Langner;Alan W. Black

  • Olympus: an open-source framework for conversational spoken language interface research

    Dan Bohus;Antoine Raux;Thomas Harris;Maxine Eskenazi

  • A Finite-State Turn-Taking Model for Spoken Dialog Systems

    Antoine Raux;Maxine Eskenazi

  • Unsupervised Discrete Sentence Representation Learning for Interpretable Neural Dialog Generation

    Tiancheng Zhao;Kyusong Lee;Maxine Eskenazi

  • Trends in speaking styles research

    Maxine Eskénazi

  • USR: An Unsupervised and Reference Free Evaluation Metric for Dialog Generation

    Shikib Mehri;Maxine Eskenazi

  • Rethinking Action Spaces for Reinforcement Learning in End-to-end Dialog Agents with Latent Variable Models

    Tiancheng Zhao;Kaige Xie;Maxine Eskenazi

  • Crowdsourcing for Speech Processing: Applications to Data Collection, Transcription and Assessment

    Maxine Eskenazi;Gina-Anne Levow;Helen Meng;Gabriel Parent

  • Structured Fusion Networks for Dialog.

    Shikib Mehri;Tejas Srinivasan;Maxine Eskenazi

  • Optimizing Endpointing Thresholds using Dialogue Features in a Spoken Dialogue System

    Antoine Raux;Maxine Eskenazi

  • The 1997 CMU Sphinx-3 English Broadcast News Transcription System

    K. Seymore;S. Chen;S. Doh;M. Eskenazi

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan W. Black
Alan W. Black Carnegie Mellon University
Isabel Trancoso
Isabel Trancoso Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento em Lisboa
Juan Pino
Juan Pino Facebook (United States)
Kevyn Collins-Thompson
Kevyn Collins-Thompson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David Traum
David Traum University of Southern California
Jamie Callan
Jamie Callan Carnegie Mellon University
Alexander I. Rudnicky
Alexander I. Rudnicky Carnegie Mellon University
Jean-Luc Gauvain
Jean-Luc Gauvain Laboratoire d'Informatique pour la Mécanique et les Sciences de l'Ingénieur
Louis-Philippe Morency
Louis-Philippe Morency Carnegie Mellon University
Lori Lamel
Lori Lamel University of Paris-Saclay

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education offers a flexible and cost-effective route into computer science and related fields. Many students choose to start with a two-year degree, and some of the best associate degrees can even be completed in as little as six months. These programs provide foundational knowledge that can be valuable in entry-level tech roles.

For those seeking advancement in leadership or academia, there are numerous cheapest phd programs online and cheapest online edd programs available. These affordable doctoral pathways deliver specialized expertise and can open doors to executive, research, or teaching careers.

Additionally, a background in computer science can be complemented with business knowledge. Many students consider enrolling in the cheapest online business degree programs to build management skills valuable in tech-based companies. No matter your career goals, combining technical knowledge with strategic skills through accessible online degrees can expand your opportunities in the evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Maxine Eskenazi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles