World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wolfgang Minker

Wolfgang Minker

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
4870
World Ranking
12649
National Ranking
619

Wolfgang Minker publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Minker sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 433 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Wolfgang Minker D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Minker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wolfgang Minker is affiliated with the University of Ulm in Germany. The scientific work spans multiple aspects of computer science and psychology with a focus on intersections of artificial intelligence, human-computer interaction, and social psychology.

The main fields of study in this research portfolio include:

  • Computer Science
  • Psychology

Within these fields, the subfields most represented are:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Signal Processing
  • Human-Computer Interaction

The research covers a diverse range of topics, particularly in technology-enhanced communication and interaction systems. Principal topics of study include:

  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Topic Modeling
  • Social Robot Interaction and HRI (Human-Robot Interaction)
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation

Frequent publication venues reflect the interdisciplinary breadth, with numerous articles published in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Access
  • it - Information Technology
  • ACM Computing Surveys
  • International Journal of Social Robotics

Among recent papers authored or coauthored, key publications include:

  • "Driver Emotion Recognition for Intelligent Vehicles" (2020) published in ACM Computing Surveys
  • "Small Talk with a Robot? The Impact of Dialog Content, Talk Initiative, and Gaze Behavior of a Social Robot on Trust, Acceptance, and Proximity" (2021) published in International Journal of Social Robotics
  • "Natural language understanding for argumentative dialogue systems in the opinion building domain" (2022) published in Knowledge-Based Systems
  • "The Role of Trust in Proactive Conversational Assistants" (2021) published in IEEE Access
  • "End-to-End Modeling and Transfer Learning for Audiovisual Emotion Recognition in-the-Wild" (2022) published in Multimodal Technologies and Interaction

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Wolfgang Minker's work. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Stefan Ultes
  • Matthias Kraus
  • Niklas Rach
  • Nicolas Wagner
  • Denis Dresvyanskiy

Best Publications

  • Driver Emotion Recognition for Intelligent Vehicles: A Survey

    Sebastian Zepf;Javier Hernandez;Alexander Schmitt;Wolfgang Minker

  • Affective Dialogue Systems

    Elisabeth André;Laila Dybkjær;Wolfgang Minker;Paul Heisterkamp

  • Evaluation and Usability of Multimodal Spoken Language Dialogue Systems

    Laila Dybkjær;Niels Ole Bernsen;Wolfgang Minker

  • Hidden Understanding Models for Machine Translation

    Wolfgang Minker;Marsal Gavalda;Alex Waibel

  • Endowing Spoken Language Dialogue Systems with Emotional Intelligence

    Elisabeth André;Matthias Rehm;Wolfgang Minker;Dirk Bühler

  • A spoken language system for information retrieval.

    Samir Bennacef;Hélène Bonneau-Maynard;Jean-Luc Gauvain;Lori Lamel

  • A Parameterized and Annotated Spoken Dialog Corpus of the CMU Let's Go Bus Information System

    Alexander Schmitt;Stefan Ultes;Wolfgang Minker

  • Bandwidth Extension of Speech Signals

    Bernd Iser;Wolfgang Minker;Gerhard Schmidt

  • Modeling and Predicting Quality in Spoken Human-Computer Interaction

    Alexander Schmitt;Benjamin Schatz;Wolfgang Minker

  • Statistical Pronunciation Modeling for Non-Native Speech Processing

    Rainer E. Gruhn;Wolfgang Minker;Satoshi Nakamura

  • Small Talk with a Robot? The Impact of Dialog Content, Talk Initiative, and Gaze Behavior of a Social Robot on Trust, Acceptance, and Proximity

    Franziska Babel;Johannes Kraus;Linda Miller;Matthias Kraus

  • Emotion recognition and adaptation in spoken dialogue systems

    Johannes Pittermann;Angela Pittermann;Wolfgang Minker

  • A stochastic case frame approach for natural language understanding

    W. Minker;S. Bennacef;J.-L. Gauvain

  • Handling Emotions in Human-Computer Dialogues

    Johannes Pittermann;Angela Pittermann;Wolfgang Minker

  • Perception and Interactive Technologies

    Elisabeth André;Laila Dybkjær;Wolfgang Minker;Heiko Neumann

  • Recent trends in discourse and dialogue

    Laila Dybkjær;Wolfgang Minker

  • Stochastically-based semantic analysis

    Wolfgang Minker;Alex Waibel;Joseph Mariani

  • Stochastic versus rule-based speech understanding for information retrieval

    Wolfgang Minker

  • Speech and Human-Machine Dialog

    Wolfgang Minker;Samir Bennacef

  • Emotion Recognition and Depression Diagnosis by Acoustic and Visual Features: A Multimodal Approach

    Maxim Sidorov;Wolfgang Minker

  • Detecting the Number of Clusters through Cluster Validation

    Amparo Albalate;Wolfgang Minker

Frequent Co-Authors

Satoshi Nakamura
Satoshi Nakamura Nara Institute of Science and Technology
Elisabeth André
Elisabeth André University of Augsburg
Michael Weber
Michael Weber University of Ulm
Sakriani Sakti
Sakriani Sakti Nara Institute of Science and Technology
Alex Waibel
Alex Waibel Carnegie Mellon University
Hani Hagras
Hani Hagras University of Essex
Heiko Neumann
Heiko Neumann University of Ulm
Gerhard Schmidt
Gerhard Schmidt Kiel University
Günther Palm
Günther Palm University of Ulm
Klaus Dietmayer
Klaus Dietmayer University of Ulm

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Computer Science opens the door to a wide variety of degrees and career options. For those seeking a fast track into the tech workforce, 2 year online degrees can provide essential skills and credentials quickly, making them ideal for career changers or those looking to upskill.

Affordability is a key concern for students. Thankfully, there are many cheap online college classes available, offering a budget-friendly path to quality education. These courses can help you build a strong academic foundation without accumulating large amounts of debt.

Not all programs strictly require top academic scores. Many college with low gpa options are available, making Computer Science accessible for students from diverse academic backgrounds.

A Computer Science degree can also intersect with other fields. For example, understanding what can you do with an environmental studies degree can inspire students to pursue interdisciplinary careers at the intersection of technology and environmental science.

Best Scientists Citing Wolfgang Minker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles