World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 110 5502 5169 305 292 979 50881

Anthony D. Ho publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anthony D. Ho between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anthony D. Ho published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 21.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 64 publications in 2008. 19 of the 1,064 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 64. Peak 64 publications in 2008. 1977: 2 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 13 publications 1990: 15 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 22 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 27 publications 2004: 49 publications 2005: 47 publications 2006: 57 publications 2007: 61 publications 2008: 64 publications 2009: 54 publications 2010: 45 publications 2011: 52 publications 2012: 43 publications 2013: 46 publications 2014: 51 publications 2015: 40 publications 2016: 59 publications 2017: 55 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 56 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 8 publications
1977 2025

1,064 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anthony D. Ho: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 2
1978 0
1979 2
1980 3
1981 0
1982 2
1983 3
1984 4
1985 6
1986 8
1987 10
1988 4
1989 13
1990 15
1991 4
1992 4
1993 5
1994 5
1995 6
1996 6
1997 4
1998 2
1999 9
2000 14
2001 22
2002 18
2003 27
2004 49
2005 47
2006 57
2007 61
2008 64
2009 54
2010 45
2011 52
2012 43
2013 46
2014 51
2015 40
2016 59
2017 55
2018 25
2019 7
2020 9
2021 15
2022 12
2023 56
2024 11
2025 8
Total 1,064
Download as CSV

Anthony D. Ho publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony D. Ho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 961–980 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 979 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91 979
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Anthony D. Ho D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony D. Ho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429 110
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anthony D. Ho is affiliated with University Hospital Heidelberg in Germany. Their research predominantly lies at the intersection of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a strong focus on hematology and molecular biology subfields. Their body of work includes 95 publications in Medicine and 50 in Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas including acute myeloid leukemia research, CAR-T cell therapy research, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia research. Other notable topics of investigation include single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, immune cells in cancer, and epigenetics and DNA methylation.

Frequent publication venues for Anthony D. Ho include the journal Blood, with 9 publications, Haematologica, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) each with 4 publications. The Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology and the International Journal of Molecular Sciences also feature multiple papers authored by them.

Key frequent co-authors collaborating with Anthony D. Ho include:

  • Carsten Müller-Tidow
  • Laura Poisa-Beiro
  • Simon Raffel
  • Volker Eckstein
  • Anne-Claude Gavin

Recent significant publications by Anthony D. Ho are:

  • Quantitative proteomics reveals specific metabolic features of acute myeloid leukemia stem cells, 2020, Blood
  • Evaluation of platelet-rich plasma as a treatment for androgenetic alopecia: A randomized controlled trial, 2020, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
  • DNA methylation changes during long-term in vitro cell culture are caused by epigenetic drift, 2021, Communications Biology
  • Nek2 kinase displaces distal appendages from the mother centriole prior to mitosis, 2020, The Journal of Cell Biology
  • The extracellular matrix proteins type I collagen, type III collagen, fibronectin, and laminin 421 stimulate migration of cancer cells, 2021, The FASEB Journal

Best Publications

  • Rituximab chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy for relapsed indolent lymphoma: half of patients respond to a four-dose treatment program.

    P McLaughlin;A J Grillo-López;B K Link;R Levy

  • Comparative characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord blood.

    Wolfgang Wagner;Frederik Wein;Anja Seckinger;Maria Frankhauser

  • Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60)

    Michael Pfreundschuh;Joerg Schubert;Marita Ziepert;Rudolf Schmits

  • Replicative senescence of mesenchymal stem cells: a continuous and organized process.

    Wolfgang Wagner;Patrick Horn;Mirco Castoldi;Anke Diehlmann

  • Human haematopoietic stem cell lineage commitment is a continuous process

    Lars Velten;Simon F. Haas;Simon Raffel;Simon Raffel;Sandra Blaszkiewicz

  • Treatment and prognosis of mature T-cell and NK-cell lymphoma: an analysis of patients with T-cell lymphoma treated in studies of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group.

    Norbert Schmitz;Lorenz Trümper;Marita Ziepert;Maike Nickelsen

  • Aging and replicative senescence have related effects on human stem and progenitor cells.

    Wolfgang Wagner;Wolfgang Wagner;Simone Bork;Patrick Horn;Damir Krunic

  • A staging system for renal outcome and early markers of renal response to chemotherapy in AL amyloidosis.

    Giovanni Palladini;Ute Hegenbart;Paolo Milani;Christoph Kimmich

  • Intensified Chemotherapy and Dose-Reduced Involved-Field Radiotherapy in Patients With Early Unfavorable Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Final Analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group HD11 Trial

    Hans Theodor Eich;Volker Diehl;Helen Görgen;Thomas Pabst

  • VEGF expression by mesenchymal stem cells contributes to angiogenesis in pancreatic carcinoma

    B. M. Beckermann;Georgios Kallifatidis;Georgios Kallifatidis;A. Groth;A. Groth;D. Frommhold

  • DNA methylation pattern changes upon long-term culture and aging of human mesenchymal stromal cells.

    Simone Bork;Stefan Pfister;Stefan Pfister;Hendrik Witt;Hendrik Witt;Patrick Horn

  • Autologous transplantation of blood-derived hemopoietic stem cells after myeloablative therapy in a patient with Burkitt's lymphoma.

    Martin Körbling;Bernd Dorken;Bernd Dorken;Anthony D. Ho;Anthony D. Ho;Antonio Pezzutto;Antonio Pezzutto

  • Suppression of T-cell functions by human granulocyte arginase.

    Markus Munder;Henriette Schneider;Claudia Luckner;Thomas Giese

  • Administration of bortezomib before and after autologous stem cell transplantation improves outcome in multiple myeloma patients with deletion 17p

    Kai Neben;Henk M. Lokhorst;Anna Jauch;Uta Bertsch

  • Rituximab therapy of patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    Dieter Huhn;Christoph von Schilling;Martin Wilhelm;Anthony D. Ho

  • Prognostic Significance of Focal Lesions in Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Asymptomatic Multiple Myeloma

    Jens Hillengass;Kerstin Fechtner;Marc-André Weber;Tobias Bäuerle

  • Arginase I is constitutively expressed in human granulocytes and participates in fungicidal activity.

    Markus Munder;Faustino Mollinedo;Jero Calafat;Javier Canchado

  • Therapeutic platelet transfusion versus routine prophylactic transfusion in patients with haematological malignancies: an open-label, multicentre, randomised study.

    Hannes Wandt;Kerstin Schaefer-Eckart;Knut Wendelin;Bettina Pilz

  • Impact of additional cytogenetic aberrations at diagnosis on prognosis of CML: long-term observation of 1151 patients from the randomized CML Study IV

    Alice Fabarius;Armin Leitner;Andreas Hochhaus;Martin C. Müller

  • Heterogeneity of mesenchymal stromal cell preparations

    A.D. Ho;W. Wagner;W. Franke

Frequent Co-Authors

Hartmut Goldschmidt
Hartmut Goldschmidt University Hospital Heidelberg
Axel Benner
Axel Benner German Cancer Research Center
Anna Jauch
Anna Jauch Heidelberg University
Norbert Schmitz
Norbert Schmitz University of Münster
Michael Pfreundschuh
Michael Pfreundschuh Saarland University
Carsten Müller-Tidow
Carsten Müller-Tidow University Hospital Heidelberg
Andreas Hochhaus
Andreas Hochhaus Friedrich Schiller University Jena

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in healthcare can open flexible pathways for both future and current professionals. For those aiming to enter the nursing field, there are cheapest online nursing programs that make starting your healthcare career more affordable than ever. These programs offer accredited curricula and can fit around busy schedules.

Current nurses looking to advance their qualifications might consider the average cost of rn to bsn programs, which can help registered nurses earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing while managing work-life commitments.

For those interested in leadership, education, or research roles, pursuing a phd nursing education online allows practicing nurses to access high-level training without relocating or pausing their careers.

Even those without a nursing background can find opportunities. If you hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, online direct entry msn programs offer an accelerated route to a Master’s in Nursing, enabling a swift transition into the field.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony D. Ho

Trending Scientists