World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
10541
World Ranking
4365
National Ranking
2040

Lizy K. John publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lizy K. John sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 359 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lizy K. John D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lizy K. John sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow, National Academy of Inventors
  • 2020 - ACM Fellow For contributions to the design, modeling and benchmarking of computer architectures
  • 2009 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to power modeling and performance evaluation of microprocessors

Overview

Lizy K. John is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with specializations in hardware and architecture, electrical and electronic engineering, computer networks and communications, artificial intelligence, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

Their work encompasses a range of topics including:

  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Embedded Systems Design Techniques
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Interconnection Networks and Systems
  • VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
  • Low-power high-performance VLSI design

Frequent co-authors in their publications include Aman Arora, Zachary Susskind, Felipe M. G. França, Alan T. L. Bacellar, and Bagus Hanindhito.

Lizy K. John's research contributions have appeared in various publication venues, notably:

  • IEEE Micro
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems

Selected recent papers by Lizy K. John include:

  • Neuro-Symbolic AI: An Emerging Class of AI Workloads and their Characterization, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Koios 2.0: Open-Source Deep Learning Benchmarks for FPGA Architecture and CAD Research, 2023, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
  • Thermal-Aware Design Space Exploration of 3-D Systolic ML Accelerators, 2021, IEEE Journal on Exploratory Solid-State Computational Devices and Circuits
  • CoMeFa: Deploying Compute-in-Memory on FPGAs for Deep Learning Acceleration, 2023, ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems
  • Tensor Slices: FPGA Building Blocks For The Deep Learning Era, 2022, ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems

Their research career includes recognition as an ACM Fellow (2020) for contributions to the design, modeling, and benchmarking of computer architectures, and being named a Fellow of the National Academy of Inventors in 2020. Earlier, in 2009, they were honored as an IEEE Fellow for contributions to power modeling and performance evaluation of microprocessors.

Best Publications

  • Scaling to the end of silicon with EDGE architectures

    D. Burger;S.W. Keckler;K.S. McKinley;M. Dahlin

  • Digital Systems Design Using VHDL

    Charles H. Roth;Lizy K. John

  • Run-time modeling and estimation of operating system power consumption

    Tao Li;Lizy Kurian John

  • A novel low power energy recovery full adder cell

    R. Shalem;E. John;L.K. John

  • Using complete machine simulation for software power estimation: the SoftWatt approach

    S. Gurumurthi;A. Sivasubramaniam;M.J. Irwin;N. Vijaykrishnan

  • Complete System Power Estimation Using Processor Performance Events

    W. L. Bircher;L. K. John

  • Analysis of redundancy and application balance in the SPEC CPU2006 benchmark suite

    Aashish Phansalkar;Ajay Joshi;Lizy K. John

  • Complete System Power Estimation: A Trickle-Down Approach Based on Performance Events

    W.L. Bircher;L.K. John

  • Minimalist open-page: a DRAM page-mode scheduling policy for the many-core era

    Dimitris Kaseridis;Jeffrey Stuecheli;Lizy Kurian John

  • Measuring Program Similarity: Experiments with SPEC CPU Benchmark Suites

    Aashish Phansalkar;Ajay Joshi;L. Eeckhout;L.K. John

  • Performance prediction based on inherent program similarity

    Kenneth Hoste;Aashish Phansalkar;Lieven Eeckhout;Andy Georges

  • Measuring benchmark similarity using inherent program characteristics

    Ajay Joshi;Aashish Phansalkar;L. Eeckhout;L.K. John

  • Control Flow Modeling in Statistical Simulation for Accurate and Efficient Processor Design Studies

    Lieven Eeckhout;Robert H. Bell;Bastiaan Stougie;Koen De Bosschere

  • The virtual write queue: coordinating DRAM and last-level cache policies

    Jeffrey Stuecheli;Dimitris Kaseridis;David Daly;Hillery C. Hunter

  • Bottlenecks in multimedia processing with SIMD style extensions and architectural enhancements

    D. Talla;L.K. John;D. Burger

  • Runtime identification of microprocessor energy saving opportunities

    W. L. Bircher;M. Valluri;J. Law;L. K. John

  • Evaluating MMX technology using DSP and multimedia applications

    Ravi Bhargava;Lizy K. John;Brian L. Evans;Ramesh Radhakrishnan

  • Elastic Refresh: Techniques to Mitigate Refresh Penalties in High Density Memory

    Jeffrey Stuecheli;Dimitris Kaseridis;Hillery C.Hunter;Lizy K. John

  • Is Compiling for Performance — Compiling for Power?

    Madhavi Valluri;Lizy K. John

  • Efficient program scheduling for heterogeneous multi-core processors

    Jian Chen;Lizy K. John

  • Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking

    Lizy Kurian John;Lieven Eeckhout

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Gerstlauer
Andreas Gerstlauer The University of Texas at Austin
Lieven Eeckhout
Lieven Eeckhout Ghent University
Tao Li
Tao Li University of Florida
Anand Sivasubramaniam
Anand Sivasubramaniam Pennsylvania State University
David J. Lilja
David J. Lilja University of Minnesota
Hai Jin
Hai Jin Huazhong University of Science and Technology
N. Vijaykrishnan
N. Vijaykrishnan Pennsylvania State University
Michael J. Schulte
Michael J. Schulte Advanced Micro Devices (United States)
Koen De Bosschere
Koen De Bosschere Ghent University
Brian L. Evans
Brian L. Evans The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to a variety of online degree options and flexible career pathways in the USA. Choosing the right field of study is important—many students consider technology-focused majors among the best majors in college due to strong demand and job growth.

For those seeking advanced education, online master’s programs can provide accessible and flexible study paths. Some look for the easiest masters degree to get online to balance study with work or family commitments. Similarly, cost can be a significant factor. Researching the cheapest phd programs online can help aspiring experts achieve their goals without overwhelming debt.

Speed is also a consideration for many professionals. Those in education fields may be interested in accelerated doctoral programs in education online as a fast-track option for career advancement. Weigh your personal priorities—cost, flexibility, time, and career outcomes—when exploring online degrees in computer science or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Lizy K. John

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles