World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 95 528 467 245 202 212 49386

Matthew R. Parsek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew R. Parsek between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew R. Parsek published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2014. 9 of the 221 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2014. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications
1991 2025

221 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew R. Parsek: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 3
1995 4
1996 0
1997 4
1998 2
1999 5
2000 6
2001 4
2002 8
2003 8
2004 5
2005 4
2006 7
2007 7
2008 7
2009 7
2010 9
2011 7
2012 14
2013 8
2014 16
2015 11
2016 5
2017 7
2018 8
2019 11
2020 9
2021 9
2022 9
2023 6
2024 5
2025 4
Total 221
Download as CSV

Matthew R. Parsek publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew R. Parsek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 205–214 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 212 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208 212
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Matthew R. Parsek D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew R. Parsek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22 95
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew R. Parsek is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersections of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a total of 68 publications in these fields. This body of work extends into specialized subfields such as molecular biology, genetics, periodontics, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and plant science.

The main topics addressed in Parsek's research include bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing, bacterial genetics and biotechnology, oral microbiology and periodontitis research, cystic fibrosis research advances, antibiotic resistance in bacteria, Vibrio bacteria research studies, and microbial community ecology and physiology.

Scientific publications by Parsek appear frequently in specific venues. The most common platforms for their work are the Journal of Bacteriology, with nine publications, followed by mBio with four, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences with three, Communications Biology with two, and FEMS Microbiology Reviews with two.

Recent notable papers by Parsek include:

  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa aggregates in cystic fibrosis sputum produce exopolysaccharides that likely impede current therapies, 2021, Cell Reports
  • The Versatile Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Matrix Protein CdrA Promotes Aggregation through Different Extracellular Exopolysaccharide Interactions, 2020, Journal of Bacteriology
  • Elevated exopolysaccharide levels in Pseudomonas aeruginosa flagellar mutants have implications for biofilm growth and chronic infections, 2020, PLoS Genetics
  • Social Cooperativity of Bacteria during Reversible Surface Attachment in Young Biofilms: a Quantitative Comparison of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 and PAO1, 2020, mBio
  • Bacterial cyclic diguanylate signaling networks sense temperature, 2021, Nature Communications

Frequent collaborators in Parsek's research include:

  • Daniel J. Wozniak
  • P. Lynne Howell
  • Courtney Reichhardt
  • Joe J. Harrison
  • Holly M. Jacobs

Best Publications

  • The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm

    David G. Davies;Matthew R. Parsek;Matthew R. Parsek;Matthew R. Parsek;James P. Pearson;James P. Pearson;James P. Pearson;Barbara H. Iglewski;Barbara H. Iglewski;Barbara H. Iglewski

  • Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle

    Michael E. Hibbing;Clay Fuqua;Matthew R. Parsek;S. Brook Peterson

  • Bacterial Biofilms: An Emerging Link to Disease Pathogenesis

    Matthew R. Parsek;Pradeep K. Singh

  • Quorum-sensing signals indicate that cystic fibrosis lungs are infected with bacterial biofilms

    Pradeep K. Singh;Amy L. Schaefer;Matthew R. Parsek;Thomas O. Moninger

  • Regulation of Gene Expression by Cell-to-Cell Communication: Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Quorum Sensing

    C Fuqua;M R Parsek;E P Greenberg

  • Gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms

    Marvin Whiteley;M. Gita Bangera;Roger E. Bumgarner;Matthew R. Parsek

  • Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms

    Matthew R. Parsek;E.P. Greenberg

  • A component of innate immunity prevents bacterial biofilm development

    Pradeep K. Singh;Matthew R. Parsek;E. Peter Greenberg;E. Peter Greenberg;Michael J. Welsh;Michael J. Welsh;Michael J. Welsh

  • Inhibition of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm bacteria by a halogenated furanone compound.

    Morten Hentzer;Kathrin Riedel;Thomas B. Rasmussen;Arne Heydorn

  • Interaction and signalling between a cosmopolitan phytoplankton and associated bacteria

    S. A. Amin;L. R. Hmelo;H. M. van Tol;B. P. Durham

  • Acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing in Gram-negative bacteria: A signaling mechanism involved in associations with higher organisms

    Matthew R. Parsek;E. Peter Greenberg

  • Heavy metal resistance of biofilm and planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

    Gail M. Teitzel;Matthew R. Parsek

  • Alginate Overproduction Affects Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Structure and Function

    Morten Hentzer;Gail M. Teitzel;Grant J. Balzer;Arne Heydorn

  • Assembly and development of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix.

    Luyan Z. Ma;Matthew Conover;Haiping Lu;Matthew R. Parsek

  • Acyl homoserine-lactone quorum-sensing signal generation

    Matthew R. Parsek;Dale L. Val;Brian L. Hanzelka;John E. Cronan

  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa Anaerobic Respiration in Biofilms: Relationships to Cystic Fibrosis Pathogenesis

    Sang Sun Yoon;Robert F. Hennigan;George M. Hilliard;Urs A. Ochsner

  • The impact of quorum sensing and swarming motility on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation is nutritionally conditional

    Joshua D. Shrout;David L. Chopp;Collin L. Just;Morten Hentzer

  • The Pel and Psl polysaccharides provide Pseudomonas aeruginosa structural redundancy within the biofilm matrix

    Kelly M. Colvin;Yasuhiko Irie;Catherine S. Tart;Rodolfo Urbano

  • The Exopolysaccharide Alginate Protects Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Bacteria from IFN-γ-Mediated Macrophage Killing

    Jeff G. Leid;Carey J. Willson;Mark E. Shirtliff;Daniel J. Hassett

  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa uses a cyclic-di-GMP-regulated adhesin to reinforce the biofilm extracellular matrix

    Bradley R. Borlee;Aaron D. Goldman;Keiji Murakami;Ram Samudrala

  • The Pel Polysaccharide Can Serve a Structural and Protective Role in the Biofilm Matrix of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    Kelly M. Colvin;Vernita D. Gordon;Keiji Murakami;Bradley R. Borlee

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel J. Wozniak
Daniel J. Wozniak The Ohio State University
Joe J. Harrison
Joe J. Harrison University of Calgary
Michael Givskov
Michael Givskov University of Copenhagen
E. P. Greenberg
E. P. Greenberg University of Washington
P. Lynne Howell
P. Lynne Howell University of Toronto
Clay Fuqua
Clay Fuqua Indiana University
Pradeep K. Singh
Pradeep K. Singh University of Washington
Lucas R. Hoffman
Lucas R. Hoffman University of Washington
Tim Tolker-Nielsen
Tim Tolker-Nielsen University of Copenhagen
Donald C. Sheppard
Donald C. Sheppard McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to microbiology can open doors to diverse career opportunities in health and biomedical fields. For those interested in patient-centered care, pursuing a functional medicine nurse practitioner program offers a specialized pathway combining microbiology knowledge with clinical practice.

In the administrative and coding realm, becoming a Certified Professional Coder (CPC) is a valuable career move. Understanding the nuances of coding medical information directly impacts healthcare delivery and reimbursement. To assess the financial prospects, reviewing a cpc salary guide is essential for informed career planning.

Health information management bridges the gap between healthcare and technology. Online programs, especially cahiim accredited him degree online options, provide the necessary credentials to excel in this field. Graduates often pursue roles such as health information managers, where knowledge of data and compliance is key. Understanding the health information manager salary can help guide expectations and career decisions.

By aligning microbiology studies with these related online degrees and career pathways, students and professionals can create a multifaceted skill set suited for the evolving healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew R. Parsek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles