What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary scientific interests are in Biofilm, Microbiology, Bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Antibiotics.
Biofilm matrix is the focus of his Biofilm research.
His studies deal with areas such as Colony count, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Hypochlorite as well as Microbiology.
Philip S. Stewart works mostly in the field of Bacteria, limiting it down to topics relating to Green fluorescent protein and, in certain cases, Pseudomonadales, as a part of the same area of interest.
His study in the field of Pseudomonadaceae is also linked to topics like Tetrazolium chloride.
His Antibacterial agent research integrates issues from Ampicillin, Ciprofloxacin, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Multidrug tolerance.
His most cited work include:
- Bacterial biofilms : A common cause of persistent infections (8689 citations)
- Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms (3071 citations)
- Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. (1392 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Biofilm, Microbiology, Bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Antimicrobial.
His Biofilm research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Antibiotics, Antibacterial agent, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Biophysics and Biocide.
His Microbiology study combines topics in areas such as Chronic wound, Multidrug tolerance and Staphylococcus aureus.
Philip S. Stewart usually deals with Bacteria and limits it to topics linked to Klebsiella pneumoniae and Ampicillin.
The Pseudomonas aeruginosa study which covers Hydrogen peroxide that intersects with Catalase.
Analytical chemistry is closely connected to Penetration in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Antimicrobial.
He most often published in these fields:
- Biofilm (89.05%)
- Microbiology (67.14%)
- Bacteria (40.48%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?
- Biofilm (89.05%)
- Microbiology (67.14%)
- Bacteria (40.48%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Biofilm, Microbiology, Bacteria, Antimicrobial and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
He interconnects Biophysics, Antibiotics and In vivo in the investigation of issues within Biofilm.
His studies in Microbiology integrate themes in fields like Microorganism, Chronic wound, Multidrug tolerance and Staphylococcus aureus.
His Bacteria study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Neutrophil clearance and Metabolism.
As part of the same scientific family, Philip S. Stewart usually focuses on Antimicrobial, concentrating on Penetration and intersecting with Biocide.
The concepts of his Pseudomonas aeruginosa study are interwoven with issues in Ex vivo and Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Biocides in Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids: A Critical Review of Their Usage, Mobility, Degradation, and Toxicity (187 citations)
- Antimicrobial Tolerance in Biofilms (180 citations)
- Contribution of Stress Responses to Antibiotic Tolerance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms (84 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Philip S. Stewart focuses on Biofilm, Microbiology, Bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Multidrug tolerance.
The various areas that Philip S. Stewart examines in his Biofilm study include Phototroph, Mixed species and Biophysics.
Microbiology is frequently linked to Chronic wound in his study.
When carried out as part of a general Bacteria research project, his work on Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Propionibacterium acnes is frequently linked to work in Multiplex polymerase chain reaction and SAPHO syndrome, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.
In the field of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, his study on Tobramycin overlaps with subjects such as rpoS.
His work deals with themes such as Agarose, Matrix, Mucus and Staphylococcus aureus, which intersect with Multidrug tolerance.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
