World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Karen S. Mitchell

Karen S. Mitchell

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6662 6204 3615 3283 110 8699

Karen S. Mitchell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Karen S. Mitchell between 1990 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Karen S. Mitchell published across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2014. 13 of the 141 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2014. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
1990 2026

141 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Karen S. Mitchell: publications per year, 1990 to 2026
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 6
2006 4
2007 3
2008 5
2009 3
2010 4
2011 4
2012 9
2013 8
2014 13
2015 3
2016 6
2017 7
2018 6
2019 6
2020 6
2021 10
2022 7
2023 5
2024 8
2025 12
2026 1
Total 141
Download as CSV

Karen S. Mitchell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen S. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 110 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 110
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Karen S. Mitchell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen S. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Karen S. Mitchell is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their primary research field is psychology, with a strong focus on clinical psychology. The scientist's work spans several subfields including clinical psychology, pharmacy, social psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The research topics Karen S. Mitchell addresses include eating disorders and behaviors, obesity and health practices, obesity, physical activity, and diet, posttraumatic stress disorder research, resilience and mental health, genetic associations and epidemiology, and obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders.

Recent publications by Karen S. Mitchell include:

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder and eating disorders: maintaining mechanisms and treatment targets, 2021, Eating Disorders
  • Eating disorder measures in a sample of military veterans: A focus on gender, age, and race/ethnicity, 2021, Psychological Assessment
  • The impact of comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder on eating disorder treatment outcomes: Investigating the unified treatment model, 2021, International Journal of Eating Disorders

Other related publications co-authored by collaborators in their research network include work on eating disorders and overweight/obesity in veterans published in 2020 in Current Obesity Reports, and genetic aspects of anorexia nervosa in Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science in 2021, though these were led by other authors.

The frequent publication venues where Karen S. Mitchell's work appears are:

  • Psychological Assessment
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
  • UNC Libraries
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Karen S. Mitchell include:

  • Brian N. Smith
  • Dawne Vogt
  • Shannon Kehle-Forbes
  • Rachel L. Zelkowitz
  • Kelsey N. Serier

Best Publications

  • Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders

    Phil H. Lee;Verneri Anttila;Hyejung Won;Yen-Chen A. Feng

  • Genome-wide association study identifies eight risk loci and implicates metabo-psychiatric origins for anorexia nervosa

    Hunna J. Watson;Hunna J. Watson;Hunna J. Watson;Zeynep Yilmaz;Laura M. Thornton;Christopher Hübel;Christopher Hübel

  • A critical evaluation of the complex PTSD literature: implications for DSM-5.

    Patricia A. Resick;Patricia A. Resick;Michelle J. Bovin;Amber L. Calloway;Alexandra M. Dick

  • Comorbidity of partial and subthreshold ptsd among men and women with eating disorders in the national comorbidity survey-replication study †

    Karen S. Mitchell;Suzanne E. Mazzeo;Michelle R. Schlesinger;Timothy D. Brewerton

  • A Pilot Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Yoga as an Intervention for PTSD Symptoms in Women

    Karen S. Mitchell;Karen S. Mitchell;Alexandra M. Dick;Dawn M. DiMartino;Brian N. Smith;Brian N. Smith

  • The impact of dissociation on PTSD treatment with cognitive processing therapy

    Patricia A. Resick;Patricia A. Resick;Michael K. Suvak;Michael K. Suvak;Benjamin D. Johnides;Karen S. Mitchell;Karen S. Mitchell

  • Innovative interventions for disordered eating: evaluating dissonance-based and yoga interventions.

    Karen S. Mitchell;Suzanne E. Mazzeo;Sarah M. Rausch;Kathryn L. Cooke

  • Differences in food intake and exercise by smoking status in adolescents.

    Diane B. Wilson;Brian N. Smith;Ilene S. Speizer;Melanie K. Bean

  • Associations among postpartum depression, eating disorders, and perfectionism in a population-based sample of adult women

    Suzanne E. Mazzeo;Margarita C.T. Slof-Op't Landt;Ian Richard Jones;Karen Mitchell

  • Exposure to Interpersonal Violence and Its Associations With Psychiatric Morbidity in a U.S. National Sample: A Gender Comparison.

    Katherine M. Iverson;Alexandra Dick;Katie A. McLaughlin;Brian N. Smith

  • Examining Mechanisms of Change in a Yoga Intervention for Women: The Influence of Mindfulness, Psychological Flexibility, and Emotion Regulation on PTSD Symptoms

    Alexandra M. Dick;Barbara L. Niles;Barbara L. Niles;Amy E. Street;Amy E. Street;Dawn M. DiMartino

  • Eating disorder symptomatology and substance use disorders: prevalence and shared risk in a population based twin sample.

    Jessica H. Baker;Karen S. Mitchell;Karen S. Mitchell;Michael C. Neale;Michael C. Neale;Kenneth S. Kendler;Kenneth S. Kendler

  • Family Study of Borderline Personality Disorder and Its Sectors of Psychopathology

    John G. Gunderson;Mary C. Zanarini;Lois W. Choi-Kain;Karen S. Mitchell

  • Eating disorders in military and veteran men and women: A systematic review.

    Brooke A. Bartlett;Karen S. Mitchell;Karen S. Mitchell

  • The Effect of a Yoga Intervention on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk in Veteran and Civilian Women with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

    Shivani M. Reddy;Alexandra M. Dick;Megan R. Gerber;Karen S. Mitchell

  • An evaluation of the reliability and construct validity of eating disorder measures in white and black women.

    Nichole R. Kelly;Karen S. Mitchell;Rachel W. Gow;Sara E. Trace

  • Network models of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder: Implications for ICD-11.

    Karen S Mitchell;Erika J Wolf;Michelle J Bovin;Lewina O Lee

  • Binge eating and psychological distress in ethnically diverse undergraduate men and women.

    Karen S Mitchell;Suzanne E Mazzeo

  • Binge eating disorder: a symptom-level investigation of genetic and environmental influences on liability.

    K. S. Mitchell;M. C. Neale;C. M. Bulik;S. H. Aggen

  • Psychosocial factors associated with non-smoking adolescents' intentions to smoke

    Brian N. Smith;Melanie K. Bean;Karen S. Mitchell;Ilene S. Speizer

  • Genome wide meta-analysis identifies genomic relationships, novel loci, and pleiotropic mechanisms across eight psychiatric disorders

    Lee Ph;Anttila;Won H

Frequent Co-Authors

Cynthia M. Bulik
Cynthia M. Bulik University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Erika J. Wolf
Erika J. Wolf Boston University
Suzanne E. Mazzeo
Suzanne E. Mazzeo Virginia Commonwealth University
Hunna J. Watson
Hunna J. Watson University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Stephan Ripke
Stephan Ripke Massachusetts General Hospital
Kenneth S. Kendler
Kenneth S. Kendler Virginia Commonwealth University
Mark W. Miller
Mark W. Miller Boston University
Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud
Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud University of Oslo
Katherine M. Iverson
Katherine M. Iverson Boston University
Aarno Palotie
Aarno Palotie University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering studying Psychology in the USA, there are a range of online degrees and career pathways to explore. One rapidly growing field is substance abuse counseling, where a background in psychology provides a solid foundation.

Each state and city often has its own educational and certification requirements for becoming a substance abuse counselor. For example, Durham substance abuse counselors education requirements may include specific coursework and supervised practice, while El Paso substance abuse counselors education requirements highlight the importance of state-approved training programs.

Certification is a key step in launching your career. In some regions, such as Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne substance abuse counselor certification requirements specify the licensing process needed, while in Fort Worth you must meet the substance abuse counselor requirements in Fort Worth, which can involve exams and continuing education.

Online degrees in psychology offer flexible paths into these careers, making it easier for students to meet local requirements while gaining essential counseling skills.

Best Scientists Citing Karen S. Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles