World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 32 8589 7981 131 126 145 4910

Mark Bakker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Bakker between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Bakker published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2022. 3 of the 214 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2022. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 16 publications 2025: 1 publication 2026: 2 publications
1984 2026

214 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Bakker: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 3
2000 2
2001 1
2002 7
2003 5
2004 13
2005 4
2006 7
2007 5
2008 7
2009 7
2010 5
2011 6
2012 6
2013 16
2014 13
2015 10
2016 10
2017 2
2018 11
2019 12
2020 6
2021 6
2022 25
2023 1
2024 16
2025 1
2026 2
Total 214
Download as CSV

Mark Bakker publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Bakker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 138–147 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 145 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491 145
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Bakker D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Bakker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278 32
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Bakker is a researcher affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their work is primarily situated within the fields of Environmental Science and Engineering, with a notable emphasis on Environmental Engineering and Mechanical Engineering. This researcher's contributions broadly address topics related to groundwater, hydrology, reservoir analysis, and landslide monitoring.

Their recent scholarly output includes research published in various peer-reviewed journals, illustrating a diverse yet interconnected set of interests in hydrological and environmental systems. Key recent papers include:

  • Estimation of Temperature and Associated Uncertainty from Fiber-Optic Raman-Spectrum Distributed Temperature Sensing (2020), Sensors
  • Estimation of groundwater recharge from groundwater levels using nonlinear transfer function noise models and comparison to lysimeter data (2021), Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • A new method to detect changes in displacement rates of slow-moving landslides using InSAR time series (2022), Landslides
  • Interaction Effects Between Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage Systems (2021), Ground Water
  • Evidence of regional sea-level rise acceleration for the North Sea (2022), Environmental Research Letters

Bakker often collaborates with a group of frequent co-authors, including Raoul Collenteur, D. Brakenhoff, Alexandra Urgilez Vinueza, Thom Bogaard, and Bas des Tombe. These repeated collaborations likely support a multidisciplinary approach across groundwater studies and hydrological modeling.

Scientific journals and publication venues where Bakker's work frequently appears include Ground Water, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Sensors, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, and Landslides. This indicates a combination of mainstream and specialized outlets relevant to groundwater systems, environmental sensing technologies, and geohazards.

The main research topics addressed by Bakker span several specialized areas:

  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
  • Hydrological Forecasting Using AI

Within the subfields of study, Bakker's expertise encompasses Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology, and Ocean Engineering. This breadth supports their work on topics such as aquifer thermal energy interactions, groundwater recharge modeling, and monitoring environmental changes using advanced sensing and data techniques.

Best Publications

  • Seawater intrusion processes, investigation and management: Recent advances and future challenges

    Adrian Deane Werner;Mark Bakker;Vincent E. A. Post;Alexander Vandenbohede

  • Scripting MODFLOW Model Development Using Python and FloPy

    Mark Bakker;Vincent E. A. Post;Vincent E. A. Post;Christian D. Langevin;Joseph D. Hughes

  • Quantification of the influence of preferential flow on slope stability using a numerical modelling approach

    W. Shao;T. A. Bogaard;M. Bakker;R. Greco

  • Analytic elements for multiaquifer flow

    Mark Bakker;Otto D.L. Strack

  • Analytic solutions for interface flow in combined confined and semi-confined, coastal aquifers

    Mark Bakker

  • Groundwater flow through anisotropic fault zones in multiaquifer systems

    E. I. Anderson;M. Bakker

  • Two-dimensional steady unsaturated flow through embedded elliptical layers

    Mark Bakker;John L. Nieber

  • A Dupuit formulation for modeling seawater intrusion in regional aquifer systems

    Mark Bakker

  • Pastas: Open Source Software for the Analysis of Groundwater Time Series.

    Raoul A. Collenteur;Mark Bakker;Ruben Caljé;Stijn A. Klop

  • Capture Zone Delineation in Two-Dimensional Groundwater Flow Models

    Mark Bakker;Otto D. L. Strack

  • The rotating movement of three immiscible fluids —a benchmark problem

    Mark Bakker;Gualbert H.P Oude Essink;Christian D Langevin

  • An active heat tracer experiment to determine groundwater velocities using fiber optic cables installed with direct push equipment

    Mark Bakker;Ruben Caljé;Frans Schaars;Kees-Jan van der Made

  • Solving Groundwater Flow Problems with Time Series Analysis: You May Not Even Need Another Model.

    Mark Bakker;Frans Schaars

  • Multilayer Analytic Element Modeling of Radial Collector Wells

    Mark Bakker;Victor A. Kelson;Kenneth H. Luther

  • Simulating groundwater flow in multi-aquifer systems with analytical and numerical Dupuit-models

    M. Bakker

  • Regional groundwater modeling of the Yucca Mountain site using analytic elements

    M. Bakker;E. I. Anderson;T. N. Olsthoorn;Otto D Strack

  • A new method to detect changes in displacement rates of slow-moving landslides using InSAR time series

    Unknown

  • The influence of preferential flow on pressure propagation and landslide triggering of the Rocca Pitigliana landslide

    Wei Shao;Thom Bogaard;Mark Bakker;Matteo Berti

  • Estimation of the Variation in Specific Discharge Over Large Depth Using Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS) Measurements of the Heat Pulse Response

    Bas F. des Tombe;Mark Bakker;Frank Smits;Frans Schaars

  • Radial Dupuit interface flow to assess the aquifer storage and recovery potential of saltwater aquifers

    Mark Bakker

  • Transient analytic elements for periodic Dupuit–Forchheimer flow

    Mark Bakker

  • Documentation of the Seawater Intrusion (SWI2) Package for MODFLOW

    Mark Bakker;Frans Schaars;Joseph D. Hughes;Christian D. Langevin

  • Software for hydrogeologic time series analysis, interfacing data with physical insight

    Jos R. Von Asmuth;Kees Maas;Martin Knotters;Marc F. P. Bierkens

Frequent Co-Authors

Thom Bogaard
Thom Bogaard Delft University of Technology
Luuk C. Rietveld
Luuk C. Rietveld Delft University of Technology
Vincent E. A. Post
Vincent E. A. Post Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources
Kazi Matin Ahmed
Kazi Matin Ahmed University of Dhaka
Ty P. A. Ferré
Ty P. A. Ferré University of Arizona
Adrian D. Werner
Adrian D. Werner Flinders University
Clifford I. Voss
Clifford I. Voss United States Geological Survey
Brian J. Mailloux
Brian J. Mailloux Barnard College
Alexander van Geen
Alexander van Geen Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Wilfred F. M. Röling
Wilfred F. M. Röling Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in exploring fields beyond Earth Science, there are a variety of online degree options that combine flexibility with career growth. For example, pursuing an online degree in Spanish can open doors in international business, translation, and education. These programs often offer affordable tuition and accelerated courses, making them accessible for many students.

Veterans seeking to continue their education may find tailored opportunities through online Spanish degree programs for veterans. These programs provide specialized support, flexible scheduling, and career resources designed to ease the transition into civilian careers.

Creative professionals might consider an MFA degree online, which allows for advanced study in writing, visual arts, and other fields while maintaining work-life balance. Many of these programs are competitively priced and offer robust faculty mentorship remotely.

For those interested in organizational leadership and employee development, online masters programs in human resource management provide essential skills to advance careers in HR, talent acquisition, and workforce planning. These degrees combine practical knowledge with flexible learning formats to fit diverse schedules.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Bakker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles