World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 39 6218 5761 655 610 128 5201

Mark O. Cuthbert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark O. Cuthbert between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark O. Cuthbert published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2020. 20 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2020. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 15 publications
2001 2025

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark O. Cuthbert: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 2
2003 0
2004 1
2005 0
2006 1
2007 1
2008 0
2009 3
2010 8
2011 1
2012 3
2013 9
2014 10
2015 8
2016 9
2017 8
2018 9
2019 12
2020 22
2021 20
2022 16
2023 8
2024 5
2025 15
Total 172
Download as CSV

Mark O. Cuthbert publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark O. Cuthbert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 128 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557 128
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark O. Cuthbert D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark O. Cuthbert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349 39
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark O. Cuthbert is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with notable work in several subfields including Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology, Geochemistry and Petrology, and Geophysics.

The scientist's research topics span a range of areas related to hydrology and water systems. Key topics include:

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Climate variability and models
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management

Mark O. Cuthbert has published extensively in several scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Hydrogeology Journal
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Hydrological Processes
  • Journal of Hydrology

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on groundwater sustainability, evapotranspiration, climate impacts, and drought effects. Recent notable publications include:

  • "Global Groundwater Sustainability, Resources, and Systems in the Anthropocene" (2020) in Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • "Hourly potential evapotranspiration at 0.1° resolution for the global land surface from 1981-present" (2021) in Scientific Data
  • "GMD perspective: The quest to improve the evaluation of groundwater representation in continental- to global-scale models" (2021) in Geoscientific Model Development
  • "Global climate-driven trade-offs between the water retention and cooling benefits of urban greening" (2022) in Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
  • "Drought onset and propagation into soil moisture and grassland vegetation responses during the 2012-2019 major drought in Southern California" (2021) in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Tom Gleeson
  • Richard G. Taylor
  • Michael Bliss Singer
  • Rafael Rosolem
  • Thorsten Wagener

Best Publications

  • Global patterns and dynamics of climate-groundwater interactions

    M. O. Cuthbert;M. O. Cuthbert;T. Gleeson;N. Moosdorf;K. M. Befus

  • Global Groundwater Sustainability, Resources, and Systems in the Anthropocene

    Tom Gleeson;Mark Olaf Cuthbert;Mark Olaf Cuthbert;Grant Ferguson;Debra Perrone

  • Observed controls on resilience of groundwater to climate variability in sub-Saharan Africa

    Mark O. Cuthbert;Richard G. Taylor;Guillaume Favreau;Guillaume Favreau;Martin C. Todd

  • A Field and Modeling Study of Fractured Rock Permeability Reduction Using Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation

    Mark O. Cuthbert;Lindsay A. McMillan;Stephanie Handley-Sidhu;Michael. S. Riley

  • Comparison of rates of ureolysis between Sporosarcina pasteurii and an indigenous groundwater community under conditions required to precipitate large volumes of calcite

    Dominique J. Tobler;Mark O. Cuthbert;Richard B. Greswell;Michael S. Riley

  • Hourly potential evapotranspiration at 0.1° resolution for the global land surface from 1981-present

    Michael Bliss Singer;Michael Bliss Singer;Dagmawi Teklu Asfaw;Rafael Rosolem;Mark O. Cuthbert;Mark O. Cuthbert

  • Towards best practice for assessing the impacts of climate change on groundwater

    I. P. Holman;D. M. Allen;Mark O. Cuthbert;P. Goderniaux;P. Goderniaux

  • Controls on the rate of ureolysis and the morphology of carbonate precipitated by S. Pasteurii biofilms and limits due to bacterial encapsulation

    Mark O. Cuthbert;Michael S. Riley;Stephanie Handley-Sidhu;Joanna C. Renshaw

  • An improved time series approach for estimating groundwater recharge from groundwater level fluctuations

    Mark Cuthbert

  • Global analysis reveals climatic controls on the oxygen isotope composition of cave drip water

    Andy Baker;Andreas Hartmann;Wuhui Duan;Stuart Hankin

  • Understanding and quantifying focused, indirect groundwater recharge from ephemeral streams using water table fluctuations

    Mark Cuthbert;Mark Cuthbert;R. I. Acworth;M. S. Andersen;J. R. Larsen;J. R. Larsen;J. R. Larsen

  • The El Niño event of 2015–2016: climate anomalies and their impact on groundwater resources in East and Southern Africa

    Seshagiri Rao Kolusu;Mohammad Shamsudduha;Martin C. Todd;Richard G. Taylor

  • Drip water isotopes in semi-arid karst: Implications for speleothem paleoclimatology

    Mark O. Cuthbert;Mark O. Cuthbert;Andy Baker;Catherine N. Jex;Peter W. Graham

  • Drought onset and propagation into soil moisture and grassland vegetation responses during the 2012–2019 major drought in Southern California

    Maria Magdalena Warter;Michael Bliss Singer;Michael Bliss Singer;Mark O. Cuthbert;Mark O. Cuthbert;Dar Roberts

  • Understanding the potential of climate teleconnections to project future groundwater drought

    William Rust;Ian Holman;John Bloomfield;Mark Cuthbert

  • Dripwater organic matter and trace element geochemistry in a semi-arid karst environment: Implications for speleothem paleoclimatology

    Helen Rutlidge;Andy Baker;Christopher E. Marjo;Martin S. Andersen

  • Impacts of nonuniform flow on estimates of vertical streambed flux

    Mark O. Cuthbert;R. Mackay

  • Highway deicing salt dynamic runoff to surface water and subsequent infiltration to groundwater during severe UK winters

    Michael O. Rivett;Mark O. Cuthbert;Richard Gamble;Lucy E. Connon

  • Understanding process dynamics at aquifer-surface water interfaces: An introduction to the special section on new modeling approaches and novel experimental technologies

    Stefan Krause;Fulvio Boano;Mark O. Cuthbert;Mark O. Cuthbert;Jan H. Fleckenstein

  • Modelling the role of groundwater hydro-refugia in East African hominin evolution and dispersal

    M.O. Cuthbert;T. Gleeson;Sally C. Reynolds;Matthew R. Bennett

  • Characterising the dynamics of surface water-groundwater interactions in intermittent and ephemeral streams using streambed thermal signatures

    Gabriel C. Rau;Landon J.S. Halloran;Mark O. Cuthbert;Martin S. Andersen

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin S. Andersen
Martin S. Andersen University of New South Wales
Andy Baker
Andy Baker University of New South Wales
Richard G. Taylor
Richard G. Taylor University College London
Michael Bliss Singer
Michael Bliss Singer Cardiff University
Tom Gleeson
Tom Gleeson University of Victoria
John H. Tellam
John H. Tellam University of Birmingham
John P. Bloomfield
John P. Bloomfield British Geological Survey
Alan MacDonald
Alan MacDonald British Geological Survey
Ian P. Holman
Ian P. Holman Cranfield University
Gail M. Ashley
Gail M. Ashley Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields. Many students consider enhancing their career prospects by pursuing complementary online degrees. For example, a human resource management masters degree online can equip graduates with leadership and organizational skills useful in environmental agencies and research institutions.

Adult learners and retirees interested in expanding their knowledge can find suitable options among the college degrees for seniors. These flexible online programs allow learners to balance study with other commitments, making lifelong learning accessible at any age.

For those interested in information science and data management related to environmental research, a mlis ala accredited programs offer specialized training in managing scientific data and libraries. This expertise can complement Earth Science pursuits significantly.

Considering whether is library science a good degree reveals it as a promising option for students aiming to support scientific knowledge through effective information management. Combining Earth Science with a library science background can lead to unique career pathways in research and education.

Best Scientists Citing Mark O. Cuthbert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles