World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
7469
World Ranking
7366
National Ranking
186

Luuk C. Rietveld publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luuk C. Rietveld sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 253 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Luuk C. Rietveld D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luuk C. Rietveld sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Forward osmosis for application in wastewater treatment: A review

    Kerusha Lutchmiah;Arne Verliefde;Kees Roest;Luuk C Rietveld

  • High-silica zeolites for adsorption of organic micro-pollutants in water treatment: A review.

    Nan Jiang;Ran Shang;Sebastiaan G.J. Heijman;Luuk C. Rietveld

  • Natural organic matter-cations complexation and its impact on water treatment: A critical review.

    Junias Adusei-Gyamfi;Baghdad Ouddane;Luuk Rietveld;Jean Paul Cornard

  • Selection of anionic exchange resins for removal of natural organic matter (NOM) fractions

    Emile Cornelissen;N Moreau;WG Siegers;AJ Abrahamse

  • Comparison of the effects of extracellular and intracellular organic matter extracted from Microcystis aeruginosa on ultrafiltration membrane fouling: dynamics and mechanisms.

    Lei Li;Zimeng Wang;Luuk C Rietveld;Naiyun Gao

  • Adsorption of triclosan, trichlorophenol and phenol by high-silica zeolites: Adsorption efficiencies and mechanisms

    Nan Jiang;Ran Shang;Sebastiaan G.J. Heijman;Luuk C. Rietveld

  • A fully adaptive forecasting model for short-term drinking water demand

    M. Bakker;J. H. G. Vreeburg;K. M. Van Schagen;L. C. Rietveld

  • Influence of natural organic matter on equilibrium adsorption of neutral and charged pharmaceuticals onto activated carbon.

    D. J. de Ridder;A. R. D. Verliefde;S. G. J. Heijman;J. Q. J. C. Verberk

  • Energy in the urban water cycle:actions to reduce the total expenditure of fossil fuels with emphasis on heat reclamation from urban water

    J.A. Elías-Maxil;Jan Peter van der Hoek;Jan Hofman;Luuk Rietveld

  • Improving the Performance of Water Demand Forecasting Models by Using Weather Input

    M. Bakker;M. Bakker;H. Van Duist;K. Van Schagen;J. Vreeburg

  • Water recovery from sewage using forward osmosis

    Kerusha Lutchmiah;Emile R. Cornelissen;Danny J. H. Harmsen;Jan W. Post

  • Flow cytometry and adenosine tri-phosphate analysis: Alternative possibilities to evaluate major bacteriological changes in drinking water treatment and distribution systems

    Marius Vital;Marco Dignum;Aleksandra Magic-Knezev;Petra Ross

  • Molecular characterization of microbial populations in groundwater sources and sand filters for drinking water production

    W.W.J.M. de Vet;I.J.T. Dinkla;G. Muyzer;L.C. Rietveld

  • Atmospheric pressure atomic layer deposition for tight ceramic nanofiltration membranes: Synthesis and application in water purification

    Ran Shang;Ran Shang;Aristeidis Goulas;Chuyang Y. Tang;Xavier de Frias Serra;Xavier de Frias Serra

  • As(III) oxidation by MnO2 during groundwater treatment

    J.C.J. Gude;L.C. Rietveld;D. van Halem

  • Biological iron oxidation by Gallionella spp. in drinking water production under fully aerated conditions.

    W.W.J.M. de Vet;I.J.T. Dinkla;L.C. Rietveld;M.C.M. van Loosdrecht

  • A tool for technical assessment of rural water supply systems in South Africa

    L.C. Rietveld;J. Haarhoff;P. Jagals

  • Practical applications of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) for water safety plans

    P. W. M. H. Smeets;L. C. Rietveld;J. C. van Dijk;G. J. Medema

  • Evaluation of different disinfection calculation methods using CFD

    B. A. Wols;J. A. M. H. Hofman;W. S. J. Uijttewaal;L. C. Rietveld

  • Zwitterions as alternative draw solutions in forward osmosis for application in wastewater reclamation

    Kerusha Lutchmiah;Lionel Lauber;Kees Roest;Danny J.H. Harmsen

Frequent Co-Authors

J.C. van Dijk
J.C. van Dijk Delft University of Technology
Mark Bakker
Mark Bakker Delft University of Technology
M.C.M. van Loosdrecht
M.C.M. van Loosdrecht Delft University of Technology
Robert Babuska
Robert Babuska Delft University of Technology
Gertjan Medema
Gertjan Medema Michigan State University
Gary L. Amy
Gary L. Amy Clemson University
Wim S. J. Uijttewaal
Wim S. J. Uijttewaal Delft University of Technology
Miro Zeman
Miro Zeman Delft University of Technology
Arno H. M. Smets
Arno H. M. Smets Delft University of Technology
Yong-Guan Zhu
Yong-Guan Zhu Chinese Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Environmental Sciences can open doors to diverse career options. Many students consider programs like online eds to edd programs for advanced education in leadership and policy, which are crucial for managing environmental projects effectively.

For those interested in the social dimensions of environmental work, pursuing a cheapest dsw program may be a cost-effective option to gain expertise in social work while impacting community sustainability.

Many students start with a online general studies bachelor degree cheap to build a broad skill set before specializing. These programs provide foundational knowledge beneficial for interdisciplinary environmental careers.

Additionally, choosing one of the easiest bachelor degree to get online can help learners quickly acquire essential skills and enter the workforce or graduate programs in environmental science and related fields.

By leveraging these online pathways, students can tailor their education to fit their goals, balancing affordability, accessibility, and career relevance in the evolving field of environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Luuk C. Rietveld

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles