World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 15872 14928 1458 1393 379 38377

Jim Cassidy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jim Cassidy between 1957 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jim Cassidy published across 70 years, from 1957 to 2026, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 60 publications in 2010. 2 of the 393 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1957 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 60. Peak 60 publications in 2010. 1957: 1 publication 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 1 publication 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 16 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 60 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
1957 2026

393 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jim Cassidy: publications per year, 1957 to 2026
Year Publications
1957 1
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 1
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 2
1989 5
1990 3
1991 5
1992 4
1993 3
1994 5
1995 7
1996 4
1997 6
1998 16
1999 16
2000 18
2001 19
2002 16
2003 7
2004 18
2005 17
2006 17
2007 16
2008 22
2009 12
2010 60
2011 25
2012 6
2013 3
2014 5
2015 25
2016 1
2017 2
2018 14
2019 5
2020 2
2021 0
2022 0
2023 2
2024 1
2025 1
2026 1
Total 393
Download as CSV

Jim Cassidy publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Cassidy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 379 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 379
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jim Cassidy D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Cassidy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jim Cassidy is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus primarily in oncology. The bulk of their work revolves around colorectal cancer, particularly its treatments and studies.

The main fields of Cassidy's research include Medicine, with subfields in Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Epidemiology. Their research topics emphasize colorectal cancer treatments and studies, cancer treatment and pharmacology, gastric cancer management and outcomes, genetic factors in colorectal cancer, colorectal cancer surgical treatments, colorectal cancer screening and detection, and shoulder and clavicle injuries.

Cassidy's recent publications demonstrate engagement with multiple aspects of cancer treatment and surgical interventions. Key papers include:

  • Bevacizumab in Combination With Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy As First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Study (2023), published in Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Leucovorin and Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer (2023), published in Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Time From Colorectal Cancer Surgery to Adjuvant Chemotherapy (2024), published in JAMA Surgery
  • A bibliometric analysis of the 50 most cited articles on acromioclavicular joint reconstruction (2025), published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY

Frequent co-authors throughout Cassidy's career include Arié Figer, Leonard B. Saltz, Stephen Clarke, Eduardo Díaz-Rubio, and Werner Scheithauer. Collaboration with these researchers indicates a strong network in oncology and surgical research.

Publication venues where Cassidy's work appears most frequently are:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • JAMA Surgery
  • MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY

Overall, Cassidy's research centers on improving cancer therapies and understanding the complexities of colorectal cancer through clinical studies and surgical outcomes. Their multidisciplinary approach combines pharmacological treatment, surgery, and examination of genetic and epidemiological factors.

Best Publications

  • Leucovorin and Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

    A. de Gramont;A. Figer;M. Seymour;M. Homerin

  • Bevacizumab in Combination With Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy As First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Study

    Leonard B. Saltz;Stephen Clarke;Eduardo Díaz-Rubio;Werner Scheithauer

  • Capecitabine as Adjuvant Treatment for Stage III Colon Cancer

    Chris Twelves;Alfred Wong;Marek P. Nowacki;Markus Abt

  • Randomized, Phase III Trial of Panitumumab With Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) Versus FOLFOX4 Alone As First-Line Treatment in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The PRIME Study

    Jean Yves Douillard;Salvatore Siena;James Cassidy;Josep Tabernero

  • Oral Capecitabine Compared With Intravenous Fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Large Phase III Study

    Eric Van Cutsem;Chris Twelves;Jim Cassidy;David Allman

  • Randomized Intergroup Trial of Cisplatin–Paclitaxel Versus Cisplatin–Cyclophosphamide in Women With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Three-Year Results

    Martine J. Piccart;Kamma Bertelsen;Keith James;Jim Cassidy

  • Phase I Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Study of PK1 [N-(2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide Copolymer Doxorubicin]: First Member of a New Class of Chemotherapeutic Agents—Drug-Polymer Conjugates

    Paul A. Vasey;Stan B. Kaye;Rosemary Morrison;Chris Twelves

  • Randomized Phase III Study of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Compared With Fluorouracil/Folinic Acid Plus Oxaliplatin As First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

    Jim Cassidy;Stephen Clarke;Eduardo Díaz-Rubio;Werner Scheithauer

  • Preferential activation of capecitabine in tumor following oral administration to colorectal cancer patients.

    Johannes Schüller;Jim Cassidy;Etienne Dumont;Brigitte Roos

  • XELOX (Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin): Active First-Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

    Jim Cassidy;Josep Tabernero;Chris Twelves;René Brunet

  • First-line oral capecitabine therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a favorable safety profile compared with intravenous 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin

    J. Cassidy;C. Twelves;E. Van Cutsem;P. Hoff

  • Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

    Jean Yves Douillard;S. Siena;J. Cassidy;J. Tabernero

  • Randomized Controlled Clinical Effectiveness Trial of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Compared With Treatment As Usual for Persistent Insomnia in Patients With Cancer

    Colin A. Espie;Leanne Fleming;James Cassidy;Leslie Samuel

  • Disulfiram modulated ROS-MAPK and NFκB pathways and targeted breast cancer cells with cancer stem cell-like properties.

    N C Yip;I S Fombon;P Liu;S Brown

  • Capecitabine, an Oral Fluoropyrimidine Carbamate With Substantial Activity in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized Phase II Study

    Eric Van Cutsem;Michael Findlay;Bruno Osterwalder;Walter Kocha

  • Oral capecitabine as an alternative to i.v. 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: safety results of a randomized, phase III trial

    W. Scheithauer;J. McKendrick;S. Begbie;M. Borner

  • Oxaliplatin-related side effects: characteristics and management.

    Jim Cassidy;Jean-Louis Misset

  • Phase II studies of polymer-doxorubicin (PK1, FCE28068) in the treatment of breast, lung and colorectal cancer.

    Leonard W. Seymour;David R. Ferry;David J. Kerr;Daniel Rea

  • XELOX vs FOLFOX-4 as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: NO16966 updated results

    J Cassidy;S Clarke;E Díaz-Rubio;W Scheithauer

  • Comparison of dexamethasone and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

    A L Jones;A S Hill;M Soukop;A W Hutcheon

Frequent Co-Authors

Howard L. McLeod
Howard L. McLeod Utah Tech University
Stan B. Kaye
Stan B. Kaye Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Ruth Duncan
Ruth Duncan Cardiff University
David Cunningham
David Cunningham Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Graeme I. Murray
Graeme I. Murray University of Aberdeen
Josep Tabernero
Josep Tabernero Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology
Leonard Saltz
Leonard Saltz Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Andrew Briggs
Andrew Briggs University of Glasgow
David J. Kerr
David J. Kerr University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of related healthcare careers and online degree options. Many students look to specialized fields that offer strong job growth and the flexibility of distance learning. For instance, for nurses aiming for advanced clinical roles, pursuing one of the cheapest DNP programs can make a Doctor of Nursing Practice both accessible and affordable.

Pharmacy is another in-demand field. Modern online pharmacy schools make it easier for working professionals or those with family commitments to pursue a Doctor of Pharmacy without sacrificing flexibility.

Behind the scenes, health information management professionals play a key role in healthcare data and administration. A health information management bachelor degree online is an ideal option for those interested in data, records, and system management in medical settings.

If you are looking for a fast entry into healthcare, obtaining a billing and coding credential is a popular path. Learn about medical billing and coding certification cost and discover programs that are recognized and budget-friendly.

Best Scientists Citing Jim Cassidy

Trending Scientists