World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charles H. Nightingale

Charles H. Nightingale

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
49
Citations
7532
World Ranking
18100
National Ranking
7398

Charles H. Nightingale publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles H. Nightingale sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 216 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Charles H. Nightingale D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles H. Nightingale sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles H. Nightingale is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their research profile does not currently list specific papers, co-authors, or detailed publication venues.

There is no available information on main or subfields of study associated with their research contributions. Similarly, there are no details regarding main research topics covered in their work or any book publications attributed to them.

Information on awards or honors received by Charles H. Nightingale is not available. The scientist is currently living.

Best Publications

  • Does the use of antibiotics in food animals pose a risk to human health? A critical review of published data

    Ian Phillips;Mark Casewell;Tony Cox;Brad De Groot

  • Experience with a once-daily aminoglycoside program administered to 2,184 adult patients.

    D P Nicolau;C D Freeman;P P Belliveau;C H Nightingale

  • Once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides: review and recommendations for clinical practice.

    Collin D. Freeman;David P. Nicolau;Paul P. Belliveau;Charles H. Nightingale

  • PHARMACOKINETICS AND CLINICAL USE OF CEPHALOSPORIN ANTIBIOTICS

    C. H. Nightingale;D. S. Greene;R. Quintiliani

  • Pharmacodynamic comparisons of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ampicillin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro model of infection

    Melinda K. Lacy;Wen Lu;Xiaowei Xu;Pamela R. Tessier

  • The pharmacodynamics of aminoglycosides

    Melinda K. Lacy;David P. Nicolau;Charles H. Nightingale;Richard Quintiliani

  • Antifungal pharmacodynamic characteristics of fluconazole and amphotericin B tested against Candida albicans.

    Michael E. Klepser;Erika J. Wolfe;Ronald N. Jones;Charles H. Nightingale

  • Use of Monte Carlo simulation to design an optimized pharmacodynamic dosing strategy for meropenem.

    Joseph L. Kuti;Prachi K. Dandekar;Charles H. Nightingale;David P. Nicolau

  • Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing regimen optimization of meropenem in adult patients

    Chonghua Li;Joseph L. Kuti;Charles H. Nightingale;David P. Nicolau

  • Continuous versus intermittent administration of ceftazidime in intensive care unit patients with nosocomial pneumonia.

    David P Nicolau;JoCarol McNabb;Melinda K Lacy;Richard Quintiliani

  • Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for β‐lactam antibiotics I: Tissue distribution and elimination in rats

    Akira Tsuji;Takayoshi Yoshikawa;Kazunori Nishide;Hidemi Minami

  • Oral bacitracin vs vancomycin therapy for Clostridium difficile-induced diarrhea. A randomized double-blind trial.

    Michael N. Dudley;James C. McLaughlin;George Carrington;Jean Frick

  • Clinical efficacy and pharmacoeconomics of a continuous-infusion piperacillin-tazobactam program in a large community teaching hospital.

    Edward M. Grant;Joseph L. Kuti;David P. Nicolau;Charles Nightingale

  • Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics in Theory and Clinical Practice

    Charles H. Nightingale;Paul G. Ambrose;George L. Drusano;Takeo Murakawa

  • Economic impact of streamlining antibiotic administration.

    R Quintiliani;B W Cooper;L L Briceland;C H Nightingale

  • Cost Effect of Managing Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus in a Long‐Term Care Facility

    Blair Capitano;O. Alice Leshem;Charles H. Nightingale;David P. Nicolau

  • Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection.

    Chonghua Li;Joseph L. Kuti;Charles H. Nightingale;Debra L. Mansfield

  • Antibiotic Streamlining From Combination Therapy to Monotherapy Utilizing an Interdisciplinary Approach

    Laurie L. Briceland;Charles H. Nightingale;Richard Quintiliani;Brian W. Cooper

  • Optimizing Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Using the MYSTIC Antibiogram: Data Collected in North America in 2002

    Joseph L. Kuti;Charles H. Nightingale;David P. Nicolau

  • The penetration characteristics of cefazolin, cephalothin, and cephradine into bone in patients undergoing total hip replacement.

    BA Cunha;HR Gossling;HS Pasternak;CH Nightingale

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Quintiliani
Richard Quintiliani Hartford Hospital
David P. Nicolau
David P. Nicolau Hartford Hospital
Michael N. Dudley
Michael N. Dudley Qpex Biopharma
Joseph L. Kuti
Joseph L. Kuti Hartford Hospital
José Pontón
José Pontón University of the Basque Country
John G. Bartlett
John G. Bartlett Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Ronald N. Jones
Ronald N. Jones JMI Laboratories
Josep Guarro
Josep Guarro Rovira i Virgili University
Javier Pemán
Javier Pemán Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe
Guillermo Quindós
Guillermo Quindós University of the Basque Country

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a variety of rewarding online degree options and career paths in the health sciences. If you’re interested in nutrition-focused roles, consider the online nutrition masters or investigate the best schools for masters in nutrition. These online programs provide flexible learning for careers in dietary planning, nutrition counseling, and wellness.

For those drawn to technology and healthcare, there are expanding opportunities in medical imaging. Accredited ultrasound tech school online programs allow students to gain clinical skills needed for sonography and diagnostic imaging careers. Similarly, earning credentials from rad tech online programs can help you qualify for radiology technologist positions, a vital part of the medical team.

These flexible online pathways make it accessible for more people to advance their expertise, enter the healthcare workforce, or transition into specialized biology-related careers, all while balancing personal and professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Charles H. Nightingale

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles