World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Brian J. Mailloux

Brian J. Mailloux

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 41 7874 7568 2791 2599 164 4782

Brian J. Mailloux publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brian J. Mailloux between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brian J. Mailloux published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2018. 2 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2018. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 15 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
1999 2026

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brian J. Mailloux: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 3
2001 7
2002 5
2003 5
2004 5
2005 2
2006 1
2007 4
2008 10
2009 5
2010 9
2011 10
2012 8
2013 5
2014 8
2015 1
2016 15
2017 4
2018 16
2019 13
2020 12
2021 7
2022 2
2023 8
2024 5
2025 1
2026 1
Total 173
Download as CSV

Brian J. Mailloux publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian J. Mailloux sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 164 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444 164
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Brian J. Mailloux D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian J. Mailloux sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343 41
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Brian J. Mailloux is affiliated with Barnard College in the United States and specializes in Environmental Science. Their research primarily focuses on several subfields including Environmental Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Infectious Diseases, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's published work addresses multiple critical topics such as:

  • Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Heavy metals in environment
  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Biosensors and Analytical Detection

Brian J. Mailloux has contributed extensively to various well-regarded publication venues. Some frequent venues include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
  • Frontiers in Sustainable Cities

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Arsenic contamination of Bangladesh aquifers exacerbated by clay layers" (2020) published in Nature Communications
  • "Offshore Freshened Groundwater in Continental Margins" (2020) published in Reviews of Geophysics
  • "Inequalities in Public Water Arsenic Concentrations in Counties and Community Water Systems across the United States, 2006-2011" (2020) published in Environmental Health Perspectives
  • "Origin of Groundwater Arsenic in a Rural Pleistocene Aquifer in Bangladesh Depressurized by Distal Municipal Pumping" (2020) published in Water Resources Research
  • "Groundwater fluoride across the Punjab plains of Pakistan and India: Distribution and underlying mechanisms" (2021) published in The Science of The Total Environment

The scientist collaborates frequently with peers in the field. Notable co-authors include:

  • Alexander van Geen
  • Benjamín C. Bostick
  • Kazi Matin Ahmed
  • Patricia J. Culligan
  • Peter S.K. Knappett

Best Publications

  • Hydrogeological characterization of the South Oyster bacterial transport site using geophysical data

    Susan S. Hubbard;Jinsong Chen;John Peterson;Ernest L. Majer

  • Flushing history as a hydrogeological control on the regional distribution of arsenic in shallow groundwater of the Bengal Basin.

    A. van Geen;Y. Zheng;S. Goodbred;A. Horneman

  • Comparison of fecal indicators with pathogenic bacteria and rotavirus in groundwater

    Andrew S. Ferguson;Alice C. Layton;Brian J. Mailloux;Patricia J. Culligan

  • Development of a Vital Fluorescent Staining Method for Monitoring Bacterial Transport in Subsurface Environments

    Mark E. Fuller;Sheryl H. Streger;Randi K. Rothmel;Brian J. Mailloux

  • Microbial mineral weathering for nutrient acquisition releases arsenic.

    Brian J. Mailloux;Ekaterina Alexandrova;Alison R. Keimowitz;Karen Wovkulich

  • A transect of groundwater and sediment properties in Araihazar, Bangladesh: Further evidence of decoupling between As and Fe mobilization

    A. van Geen;Y. Zheng;Y. Zheng;Z. Cheng;Z. Aziz

  • Megacity pumping and preferential flow threaten groundwater quality.

    Mahfuzur R. Khan;Mohammad Koneshloo;Peter Knappett;Kazi Matin Ahmed

  • Advection of surface-derived organic carbon fuels microbial reduction in Bangladesh groundwater

    Brian J. Mailloux;Elizabeth Trembath-Reichert;Jennifer Cheung;Marlena Watson

  • Arsenic mobilization from sediments in microcosms under sulfate reduction.

    Jing Sun;Andrew N. Quicksall;Steven N. Chillrud;Brian J. Mailloux

  • Fecal Contamination of Shallow Tubewells in Bangladesh Inversely Related to Arsenic

    Alexander van Geen;Kazi Matin Ahmed;Yasuyuki Akita;Md. Jahangir Alam

  • Redox trapping of arsenic during groundwater discharge in sediments from the Meghna riverbank in Bangladesh

    S. Datta;B. Mailloux;H.-B. Jung;M. A. Hoque

  • Extended tailing of bacteria following breakthrough at the Narrow Channel Focus Area, Oyster, Virginia

    Pengfei Zhang;William P. Johnson;Timothy D. Scheibe;Keun Hyung Choi

  • Relative dominance of physical versus chemical effects on the transport of adhesion-deficient bacteria in intact cores from South Oyster, Virginia.

    Hailang Dong;Tullis C. Onstott;Mary F. Deflaun;Mark E. Fuller

  • Theoretical prediction of collision efficiency between adhesion-deficient bacteria and sediment grain surface

    Hailiang Dong;Tullis C. Onstott;Chun-Han Ko;Andrew D. Hollingsworth

  • Arsenic contamination of Bangladesh aquifers exacerbated by clay layers.

    Ivan Mihajlov;M. Rajib H. Mozumder;M. Rajib H. Mozumder;Benjamín C. Bostick;Martin Stute;Martin Stute

  • Laboratory investigations of enhanced sulfate reduction as a groundwater arsenic remediation strategy.

    A. R. Keimowitz;B. J. Mailloux;P. Cole;M. Stute

  • Impact of Population and Latrines on Fecal Contamination of Ponds in Rural Bangladesh

    Peter S.K. Knappett;Veronica Escamilla;Alice Layton;Larry D. McKay

  • Mobilization of arsenic during one-year incubations of grey aquifer sands from Araihazar, Bangladesh.

    Kathleen A. Radloff;Zhongqi Cheng;Mohammad W. Rahman;Kazi M. Ahmed

  • Inequalities in Public Water Arsenic Concentrations in Counties and Community Water Systems across the United States, 2006–2011

    Anne E. Nigra;Qixuan Chen;Steven N. Chillrud;Lili Wang

  • Offshore freshened groundwater in continental margins

    Aaron Micallef;Mark Person;Christian Berndt;Claudia Bertoni

  • Advection of Surface-Derived Organic Carbon Fuels Microbial Reduction in Bangladesh Groundwater

    B J Mailloux;E Trembath-Reichert;J Cheung;M Watson

  • Microbial Mineral Weathering for Nutrient Acquisition Releases Arsenic

    B. J. Mailloux;E. Alexandrova;A. Keimowitz;K. Wovkulich

Frequent Co-Authors

Kazi Matin Ahmed
Kazi Matin Ahmed University of Dhaka
Benjamin C. Bostick
Benjamin C. Bostick Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Alexander van Geen
Alexander van Geen Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Martin Stute
Martin Stute Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Tullis C. Onstott
Tullis C. Onstott Princeton University
Steven N. Chillrud
Steven N. Chillrud Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Larry D. McKay
Larry D. McKay University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Yan Zheng
Yan Zheng Southern University of Science and Technology
Peter Schlosser
Peter Schlosser Arizona State University
Michael Emch
Michael Emch University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their knowledge beyond Environmental Sciences, there are many related online degrees that offer flexible learning opportunities. Pursuing advanced education through the best eds to edd programs can prepare educators and professionals to impact environmental education and policy on a broader scale.

Students seeking to combine social work with environmental advocacy might explore dsw programs online, which offer affordable pathways to advanced degrees focused on social impact. These programs can complement an environmental background by addressing community health and sustainability.

If you're looking for a broader academic foundation, the cheapest online general studies degree programs provide accessible options to tailor studies across disciplines that include environmental topics.

For those new to higher education or seeking to return for additional qualifications, exploring some of the easy bachelor's degree options can be a smart way to start. These programs offer manageable workloads while building a foundation for more specialized environmental career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Brian J. Mailloux

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles